it worked!
i applied the patches alone and it didn't work, but then i noticed simon's
note to add compatible = "spi-flash" so i added it on the arria 5 dts file,
and it worked.
i think it should be added to the patches.
thanks for the help!
--
Sent from: http://u-boot.10912.n7.nabble.com/
_
Pepperl+Fuchs GmbH, Mannheim
Geschaeftsfuehrer/Managing Directors: Dr.-Ing. Gunther Kegel (Vors./CEO),
Werner Guthier, Mehmet Hatiboglu
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats/Chairman of the supervisory board: Claus Michael
Registergericht/Register Court: AG Mannheim HRB 4713
On 18.01.2018 06:07, Jason
On 18.01.2018 06:07, Jason Rush wrote:
On 1/17/2018 7:46 AM, RB23 wrote:
i checked, and if you mean these patches:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/765992/
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/765996/
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/765997/
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/765998/
i alread
On 1/17/2018 7:46 AM, RB23 wrote:
> i checked, and if you mean these patches:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/765992/
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/765996/
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/765997/
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/765998/
>
> i already applied them, and they didn
i checked, and if you mean these patches:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/765992/
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/765996/
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/765997/
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/765998/
i already applied them, and they didn't work as well.
i also found these patches wh
On 01/17/2018 02:06 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> On 17.01.2018 14:01, RB23 wrote:
>> hey, i downloaded the september and november versions and i applied
>> the patches on both of them, re-compiled the u boot,
>> and still, it gives me the same error when trying the command "sf probe"
>> i'm not s
On 17.01.2018 14:01, RB23 wrote:
hey, i downloaded the september and november versions and i applied
the patches on both of them, re-compiled the u boot,
and still, it gives me the same error when trying the command "sf probe"
i'm not sure what to do, is it possible that i missed something? like
hey, i downloaded the september and november versions and i applied the
patches on both of them, re-compiled the u boot,
and still, it gives me the same error when trying the command "sf probe"
i'm not sure what to do, is it possible that i missed something? like a
define or something in the make m
On Mon, 08/012018 06:27, Vignesh R wrote:
> On Monday 08 January 2018 09:10 AM, Jason Rush wrote:
> [...]
> >>> 1. The indaddrtrig register was being programmed with an incorrect
> >>> value for socfpga as the result of assuming it should be programmed
> >>> with the same address as the ahbbase add
On Monday 08 January 2018 09:10 AM, Jason Rush wrote:
[...]
>>> 1. The indaddrtrig register was being programmed with an incorrect value
>>> for socfpga
>>> as the result of assuming it should be programmed with the same address as
>>> the
>>> ahbbase address. This issue is resolved by adoptin
On 1/7/2018 5:39 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 01/06/2018 10:09 PM, Jason Rush wrote:
>> On 1/6/2018 1:29 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 01/06/2018 07:46 PM, Jason Rush wrote:
On 1/6/2018 9:42 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>
>>
There was a minor upstream change to one of the files since I submitt
On 01/06/2018 10:09 PM, Jason Rush wrote:
> On 1/6/2018 1:29 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 01/06/2018 07:46 PM, Jason Rush wrote:
>>> On 1/6/2018 9:42 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>
>
>
>>> There was a minor upstream change to one of the files since I submitted v4
>>> of my
>>> cadence device-tree pat
On 1/6/2018 1:29 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 01/06/2018 07:46 PM, Jason Rush wrote:
>> On 1/6/2018 9:42 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> There was a minor upstream change to one of the files since I submitted v4
>> of my
>> cadence device-tree patchset, so I rebased and resent the patchset as a v5.
On 01/06/2018 07:46 PM, Jason Rush wrote:
> On 1/6/2018 9:42 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 01/06/2018 02:39 PM, Goldschmidt Simon wrote:
>>> On Fri, 05/01/2018, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 01/05/2018 08:31 PM, Goldschmidt Simon wrote:
> On Fri, 05/01/2018 Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 01/05/2018 0
On 1/6/2018 9:42 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 01/06/2018 02:39 PM, Goldschmidt Simon wrote:
>> On Fri, 05/01/2018, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 01/05/2018 08:31 PM, Goldschmidt Simon wrote:
On Fri, 05/01/2018 Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 01/05/2018 04:49 PM, Goldschmidt Simon wrote:
On 01/06/2018 02:39 PM, Goldschmidt Simon wrote:
> On Fri, 05/01/2018, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 01/05/2018 08:31 PM, Goldschmidt Simon wrote:
>>> On Fri, 05/01/2018 Marek Vasut wrote:
On 01/05/2018 04:49 PM, Goldschmidt Simon wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> OK, so I need these patches to get qspi
On Fri, 05/01/2018, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 01/05/2018 08:31 PM, Goldschmidt Simon wrote:
>> On Fri, 05/01/2018 Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 01/05/2018 04:49 PM, Goldschmidt Simon wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> OK, so I need these patches to get qspi work on socfpga:
>>
>> - Series "spi: cadence_spi:
On 01/05/2018 08:31 PM, Goldschmidt Simon wrote:
> On Fri, 05/01/2018 Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 01/05/2018 04:49 PM, Goldschmidt Simon wrote:
>
>
>
> OK, so I need these patches to get qspi work on socfpga:
>
> - Series "spi: cadence_spi: Adopt Linux DT bindings" (v4) from Jason Rush:
On Fri, 05/01/2018 Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 01/05/2018 04:49 PM, Goldschmidt Simon wrote:
OK, so I need these patches to get qspi work on socfpga:
- Series "spi: cadence_spi: Adopt Linux DT bindings" (v4) from Jason Rush:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?seri
On 01/05/2018 04:49 PM, Goldschmidt Simon wrote:
> + Marek (as Jagan wants an ack)
>
> On 05/01/2018 Jagan Teki wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Goldschmidt Simon wrote:
>>> + Vignesh
>>> + Jason
>>>
>>> On Wed, 03/01/2018 16:57, Goldschmidt Simon wrote:
On Wed, 03/01/2018 14:51, Jag
+ Marek (as Jagan wants an ack)
On 05/01/2018 Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Goldschmidt Simon wrote:
>> + Vignesh
>> + Jason
>>
>> On Wed, 03/01/2018 16:57, Goldschmidt Simon wrote:
>>> On Wed, 03/01/2018 14:51, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>> >> There were already patches posted on th
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Goldschmidt Simon
wrote:
> + Vignesh
> + Jason
>
> On Wed, 03/01/2018 16:57, Goldschmidt Simon wrote:
>> On Wed, 03/01/2018 14:51, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> >> There were already patches posted on this list by me and others, but
>> >> unfortunately they haven't made it i
+ Vignesh
+ Jason
On Wed, 03/01/2018 16:57, Goldschmidt Simon wrote:
> On Wed, 03/01/2018 14:51, Jagan Teki wrote:
> >> There were already patches posted on this list by me and others, but
> >> unfortunately they haven't made it into the repository, yet.
> >>
> >> Jagan, could you comment on the s
yeah, those patches might help me a lot, i can't get it to work right now.
thanks a lot.
--
Sent from: http://u-boot.10912.n7.nabble.com/
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
On Wed, 03/01/2018 14:51, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> There were already patches posted on this list by me and others, but
>> unfortunately they haven't made it into the repository, yet.
>>
>> Jagan, could you comment on the status of these fixes? I can search
>> for the patchwork items related if you wan
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 7:08 PM, Goldschmidt Simon
wrote:
> + Jagan
>
> On Wed, 03/01/2018, Mr. goldenstreet wrote:
>> hey, i have looked at this thread:
>> http://u-boot.10912.n7.nabble.com/QSPI-quot-sf-probe-quot-quot-sf-read-quot-on-
>> Altera-SoC-FPGA-td304882.html
>>
>> i'm having the same pro
+ Jagan
On Wed, 03/01/2018, Mr. goldenstreet wrote:
> hey, i have looked at this thread:
> http://u-boot.10912.n7.nabble.com/QSPI-quot-sf-probe-quot-quot-sf-read-quot-on-
> Altera-SoC-FPGA-td304882.html
>
> i'm having the same problem with Arria 5, when i try to use the "sf probe"
> command on th
hey, i have looked at this thread:
http://u-boot.10912.n7.nabble.com/QSPI-quot-sf-probe-quot-quot-sf-read-quot-on-Altera-SoC-FPGA-td304882.html
i'm having the same problem with Arria 5,
when i try to use the "sf probe" command on the nor flash,
the result i'm getting0 is:
SF: Detected n25q512 wit
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Hannes Schmelzer wrote:
> Hi Eldor,
>
> just found your post in the mailinglist.
>
> https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2016-December/276491.html
>
> Reason why i'm searched there is, that i've now excactly same problem as
> you.
Can you give some details, issu
Hi Eldor,
just found your post in the mailinglist.
https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2016-December/276491.html
Reason why i'm searched there is, that i've now excactly same problem as
you.
I'm using most current mainline u-boot.
did you ever found some solution for your tro
Hi,
I observe a behavior with the QSPI functionality on newer uboot versions; e.g.
2016.11 rc1 and also latest from DENX mainline.
I was wondering whether anyone else has experienced similar issue(s) and can
perhaps give hints as to what can cause this.
I will try to narrow down the issue t
31 matches
Mail list logo
