Hi Måns,
On 04/12/2013 16:35, Måns Rullgård wrote:
mx6: compute PLL PFD frequencies rather than using defines
That commit introduces a 64-bit division without using the lldiv()
function, which pulls in previously unused libgcc stuff.
Try this patch:
As it was proofed that your patch
2013/12/4 Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com:
Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Christian Gmeiner,
In message
cah9nwweb6s+3s4o25d7cifob9y3_7jmhosjo6o78fijquwz...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
I am running into
Dear Måns Rullgård ,
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Måns Rullgård [hidden email] wrote:
mx6: compute PLL PFD frequencies rather than using defines
That commit introduces a 64-bit division without using the lldiv()
function, which pulls in previously unused libgcc stuff.
Thank you for
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Christian Gmeiner,
In message
cah9nwweb6s+3s4o25d7cifob9y3_7jmhosjo6o78fijquwz...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
I am running into the same problem. Me wonders which patch/change
triggers this problem. I am using
the
Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Christian Gmeiner,
In message
cah9nwweb6s+3s4o25d7cifob9y3_7jmhosjo6o78fijquwz...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
I am running into the same problem. Me wonders which
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com wrote:
Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Christian Gmeiner,
In message
cah9nwweb6s+3s4o25d7cifob9y3_7jmhosjo6o78fijquwz...@mail.gmail.com you
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 07:27:29AM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Abraham V.,
In message
canie1qo9fdokevjq89w3ceoxryic9d_do71vv9brtg7bnj-...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
I didn't notice that difference until you pointed it out. Till now, I was
under the assumption that both toolchains
2013/11/29 Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de:
Dear Abraham V.,
In message
canie1qo9fdokevjq89w3ceoxryic9d_do71vv9brtg7bnj-...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
I didn't notice that difference until you pointed it out. Till now, I was
under the assumption that both toolchains were (feature-wise)
Dear Christian Gmeiner,
In message cah9nwweb6s+3s4o25d7cifob9y3_7jmhosjo6o78fijquwz...@mail.gmail.com
you wrote:
I am running into the same problem. Me wonders which patch/change
triggers this problem. I am using
the same toolchain since I started to work with u-boot and it fails
with the
Thanks Stefano,
I didn't notice that difference until you pointed it out. Till now, I was
under the assumption that both toolchains were (feature-wise) identical.
And I *almost* sent a complaint letter to Linaro about this too ... Guess,
I've got more to learn than I anticipated.
Sincerely,
Dear Abraham V.,
In message canie1qo9fdokevjq89w3ceoxryic9d_do71vv9brtg7bnj-...@mail.gmail.com
you wrote:
I didn't notice that difference until you pointed it out. Till now, I was
under the assumption that both toolchains were (feature-wise) identical.
And I *almost* sent a complaint letter
Hello everyone,
I've got a copy of mainline uboot. Here's the last log message in it;
git log --name-status HEAD^..HEAD
commit d19ad726bcd5d9106f7ba9c750462fcc369f1020
Author: Tom Rini tr...@ti.com
Date: Mon Nov 25 16:49:32 2013 -0500
Prepare v2014.01-rc1
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini
Hi Abraham,
On 28/11/2013 05:22, Abraham V. wrote:
test/built-in.o --end-group
/home/abraham/SPACE/temp_uboot/arch/arm/lib/eabi_compat.o -L
/home/abraham/SPACE/BISQUARE/source/uboot_update/gcc-linaro-arm/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabihf/4.8.2
-lgcc -Map u-boot.map -o u-boot
13 matches
Mail list logo
