Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add brackets to if condition in tools/setlocalversion

2008-03-20 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > The long condition in the script causes all ColdFire platforms > unable to compile correctly. By adding square brackets, all > compile without error. > > Signed-off-by: TsiChung Liew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > tools/setlocalversion |4 ++-- > 1 fil

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add brackets to if condition in tools/setlocalversion

2008-03-20 Thread Tsi-Chung Liew
The long condition in the script causes all ColdFire platforms unable to compile correctly. By adding square brackets, all compile without error. Signed-off-by: TsiChung Liew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- tools/setlocalversion |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 7/7] [new uImage] Enable new uImage support for the pcs440ep board.

2008-03-20 Thread Bartlomiej Sieka
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Sieka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/configs/pcs440ep.h |6 ++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/pcs440ep.h b/include/configs/pcs440ep.h index 893924b..ba6d932 100644 --- a/include/configs/pcs440ep.h +++ b/include/con

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 6/7] [new uImage] Do not compile new uImage format support by default

2008-03-20 Thread Bartlomiej Sieka
Disable default building of new uImage format support in preparation for merge with the master. Support for new format can be enabled on a per-board basis, by defining the following in the board's config file: #define CONFIG_FIT 1 #define CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT 1 This can be optionall

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 5/7] [new uImage] Disable debuging output in preparation for merge with master

2008-03-20 Thread Bartlomiej Sieka
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Sieka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- common/cmd_bootm.c |1 - common/image.c |1 - lib_ppc/bootm.c|1 - 3 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/common/cmd_bootm.c b/common/cmd_bootm.c index 2f232e7..789ee03 100644 --- a/common/cmd_boot

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 4/7] [new uImage] Compilation and new uImage handling fixes for imxtract

2008-03-20 Thread Bartlomiej Sieka
Fix imxtract command not being compiled-in despite CONFIG_CMD_XIMG being in include/config_cmd_default.h. Fix few warnings and handling of new format images. Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Sieka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- common/cmd_ximg.c | 12 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletio

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/7] [new uImage] Fix autoscr command used with new uImage format

2008-03-20 Thread Bartlomiej Sieka
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Sieka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- common/cmd_autoscript.c |9 +++-- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/common/cmd_autoscript.c b/common/cmd_autoscript.c index 5163d57..1a37b90 100644 --- a/common/cmd_autoscript.c +++ b/common/cmd_autoscrip

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/7] [new uImage] Fix *.its files location in documentation

2008-03-20 Thread Bartlomiej Sieka
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Sieka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- doc/uImage.FIT/howto.txt | 19 ++- doc/uImage.FIT/source_file_format.txt |2 +- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/uImage.FIT/howto.txt b/doc/uImage.FIT/howto.txt index 35a

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 0/7] [new uImage] final fixes and cleanups

2008-03-20 Thread Bartlomiej Sieka
Hi, This patch series consists of final fixes and cleanups of the new uImage work: - fix style issue in previously posted patch - update to doc/uImage.FIT/ - fixes to autoscr and mxtract commands - preparation for merge with the master - disable debugging output - disable new format support by

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/7] [new uImage] Style fix

2008-03-20 Thread Bartlomiej Sieka
Fix style issue spotted by Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Sieka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- board/trab/auto_update.c | 18 +++--- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/board/trab/auto_update.c b/board/trab/auto_update.c index 5311e

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Update CONFIG_PCIAUTO_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE to related boards

2008-03-20 Thread Tsi-Chung Liew
Signed-off-by: TsiChung Liew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/pci/pci_auto.c |2 +- include/configs/BC3450.h|1 + include/configs/M54455EVB.h |2 +- include/configs/M5475EVB.h |2 +- include/configs/M5485EVB.h |1 + include/configs/PM520.h |1 + include/config

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add CONFIG_MII_INIT in cmd_mii.c

2008-03-20 Thread Tsi-Chung Liew
From: TsiChung Liew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Provide common configuration in do_mii() to execute mii_init() for all cpu architectures Signed-off-by: TsiChung Liew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- common/cmd_mii.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/common/cmd_mii.c b/comm

Re: [U-Boot-Users] include/autoconf.mk issue

2008-03-20 Thread Grant Likely
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Grant, > > in http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot > Jean-Christophe asked to get rid of the "#ifdef CONFIG_POST" parts in > the post code by using the "COBJS-$(CONFIG_POST) += " approach in the > M

Re: [U-Boot-Users] make env

2008-03-20 Thread Ladislav Michl
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 10:27:18PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > It's not fw_setenv specific. You would have to do the same when you > cross-compile any other native Linux application code. The best > approach would be to fix your toolchain. Well, any other applications compile just fine.

Re: [U-Boot-Users] make env

2008-03-20 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > I'm not sure what you wanted to express with your comment? > > Well, it seems you have "properly" configured toolchain - you installed > proper kernel headers. In my case it ends with: Well, yes, a correctly configured and working toolchain is consi

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Don't use last 256 bytes of SDRAM, workaround for 440EPx CHIP 11 errata

2008-03-20 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Larry, On Thursday 20 March 2008, Larry Johnson wrote: > Having multiple implementations of the 440EXp SDRAM setup code is, in > itself, less than ideal. One alternative is to have a 440EPX board with > on-board SDRAM chips fake an array of SPD bytes describing the chips, > and pass it to the

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] lwmon5 POST: remove unreachable code

2008-03-20 Thread Wolfgang Denk
plus some coding style cleanup Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- post/board/lwmon5/watchdog.c | 43 +++-- 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/post/board/lwmon5/watchdog.c b/post/board/lwmon5/watchdog.c index 834

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] LWMON5: POST RTC fix

2008-03-20 Thread Wolfgang Denk
From: Yuri Tikhonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Modify the RTC API to provide one a status for the time reported by the rtc_get() function: 0 - a reliable time is guaranteed, < 0 - a reliable time isn't guaranteed (power fault, clock issues, and so on). The RTC chip drivers are responsible for pr

Re: [U-Boot-Users] make env

2008-03-20 Thread Ladislav Michl
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 09:02:58PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Yes, and actually I think this is correct. What we're building is a > target Linux application, so the U-Boto specific CFLAG settings have > no meaning for this (or rather would be just dangerous). > > Example: > > -> make env > mak

Re: [U-Boot-Users] make env

2008-03-20 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 05:04:35PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > I guess (you fail to mention such a basic fact as which version you > > are using) that you are referring to old code. So I recommend to use > > recent code (i. e. release 1.3.2). > >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2 6/9] mpc83xx: serdes setup routines

2008-03-20 Thread Kim Phillips
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:26:36 +0800 Dave Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > This patch adds few routines to configure serdes on 837x targets. > > Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- sounds like Anton is re-doing this patch. Kim -

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2 2/9] ATA: Add the libata support

2008-03-20 Thread Kim Phillips
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:19:52 +0800 Dave Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/block/libata.c b/drivers/block/libata.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000..aed5be3 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/block/libata.c > @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ > +/* > + * Copyright (C) 2008 Freescale Semicond

Re: [U-Boot-Users] ARM custodian change

2008-03-20 Thread Stelian Pop
Le jeudi 20 mars 2008 à 17:36 +, Nicolas Ferre a écrit : > Ulf Samuelsson atmel.com> writes: > > > > Too bad. I think it would be a good idea, if "they" would try to work > > > with > > > the "official" U-Boot community again. Now with the custodian framework > > > in > > > place, some p

Re: [U-Boot-Users] make env

2008-03-20 Thread Ladislav Michl
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 05:04:35PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > I guess (you fail to mention such a basic fact as which version you > are using) that you are referring to old code. So I recommend to use > recent code (i. e. release 1.3.2). No matter how recent version is he going to use. Relat

Re: [U-Boot-Users] ARM custodian change

2008-03-20 Thread Nicolas Ferre
Ulf Samuelsson atmel.com> writes: > > Too bad. I think it would be a good idea, if "they" would try to work with > > the "official" U-Boot community again. Now with the custodian framework in > > place, some problems of the past should be solved. > > I 'bcc' our own "Jean-Christophe" (Zettel)

Re: [U-Boot-Users] ARM custodian change

2008-03-20 Thread Nicolas Ferre
Ulf Samuelsson atmel.com> writes: > > > On Tuesday 18 March 2008, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: > >> > Here a short announcement about a change in the U-Boot ARM > >> > custodianship: > >> > > >> > Since the ARM platform is so broad and has multiple vendor > >> > specific "sub-architectures" it seemed

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/3] mpc8323erdb: Improve the system performance

2008-03-20 Thread Michael Barkowski
The following changes are based on kernel UCC ethernet performance: 1. Make the CSB bus pipeline depth as 4, and enable the repeat mode 2. Optimize transactions between QE and CSB. Added CFG_SPCR_OPT switch to enable this setting. The following changes are based on the App Note AN3369 and

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/3] mpc8323erdb: remove RTC and add EEPROM

2008-03-20 Thread Michael Barkowski
There's no on-board RTC on the MPC8323ERDB, but there is an EEPROM. Signed-off-by: Michael Barkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked-by: Kim Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/configs/MPC8323ERDB.h |7 --- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/MPC

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] mpc8323erdb: use readable DDR config macros

2008-03-20 Thread Michael Barkowski
Use available shift/mask macros to define DDR configuration. Signed-off-by: Michael Barkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked-by: Kim Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/configs/MPC8323ERDB.h | 50 ++-- 1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff

Re: [U-Boot-Users] include/autoconf.mk issue

2008-03-20 Thread Jerry Van Baren
Jon Loeliger wrote: > On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 10:32, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > >> Um... that would fix this specific situation - but we might still run >> into the same problem with the next attempt to convert code to the >> new config style. > > Yeah, we just need to pick 'em off one-by-one... :-)

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/7] 83xx: nand support for MPC837XRDB boards

2008-03-20 Thread Anton Vorontsov
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:26:45AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 08:16:45PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:10:55 +0300 > > Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > -/* VSC7385 Gigabit Switch support */ > > > > > +/* > > > > > + * V

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/7] 83xx: nand support for MPC837XRDB boards

2008-03-20 Thread Scott Wood
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 08:16:45PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote: > On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:10:55 +0300 > Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > -/* VSC7385 Gigabit Switch support */ > > > > +/* > > > > + * VSC7385 Gigabit Switch support > > > > + */ > > > > +#define CFG_VSC7385_BASE

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Don't use last 256 bytes of SDRAM, workaround for 440EPx CHIP 11 errata

2008-03-20 Thread Larry Johnson
Stefan Roese wrote: > Hi Wolfgang, > > On Thursday 20 March 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>> This patch adds this workaround for the following 440EPx boards: >>> sequoia, lwmon5. Others should probably follow this example. >> OK, the default configs for Sequoia doesn't use shared log buffer, and >>

Re: [U-Boot-Users] make env

2008-03-20 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > SGVsbG8KCmNvdWxkIGFueWJvZHkgdGVsbCBtZSBob3cgdG8gY29tcGlsZSB0aGUgfGZ3X3NldGVu > diBhbmQgfHxmd19zYXZlZW52IApiaW5hcmllcyA/CgpJIHRyeSB0byB1c2UKCm1ha2UgQVJDSD1h > cm0gQ1JPU1NfQ09NUElMRT08UGF0aCB0byBteSBDcm9zc0NvbXBpbGVyPiBlbnYKCkJ1dCB0aGlz > IGRvZXNuwrR0IHdvcm

Re: [U-Boot-Users] include/autoconf.mk issue

2008-03-20 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > Ah, as I understand that one, I think it gets solved in > a slightly different manner. The kernel introduces a "HAS" > variant that indicates if the feature is enabled and > then uses something like CONFIG_HAS_PREBOOT to indicate > and test for its pre

[U-Boot-Users] make env

2008-03-20 Thread Manuel Sahm
Hello could anybody tell me how to compile the |fw_setenv and ||fw_saveenv binaries ? I try to use make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE= env But this doesn´t work. #error This is a kernel header. Perhaps include mtd-user.h instead ? and a lot of error messages appaer ? Thank you| Best regards Manu

Re: [U-Boot-Users] include/autoconf.mk issue

2008-03-20 Thread Jon Loeliger
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 10:32, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Um... that would fix this specific situation - but we might still run > into the same problem with the next attempt to convert code to the > new config style. Yeah, we just need to pick 'em off one-by-one... :-) > For example, there might be

Re: [U-Boot-Users] include/autoconf.mk issue

2008-03-20 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > ... > > CONFIG_POST="(CFG_POST_CACHE | CFG_POST_CPU | CFG_POST_ECC_ON | > > CFG_POST_ETHER | CFG_POST_FPU | CFG_POST_I2C | CFG_POST_MEMORY | > > CFG_POST_RTC | CFG_POST_SPR | CFG_POST_UART | CFG_POST_SYSMON | > > CFG_POST_WATCHDOG | CFG_POST_DSP | CFG_

Re: [U-Boot-Users] include/autoconf.mk issue

2008-03-20 Thread Jon Loeliger
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 18:29, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Grant, > > in http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot > Jean-Christophe asked to get rid of the "#ifdef CONFIG_POST" parts in > the post code by using the "COBJS-$(CONFIG_POST) += " approach in the > Makefile. We tried, and it d

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] [ARM] [RESUBMIT] Move ARM supplied dev boards to new board/arm directory

2008-03-20 Thread Jon Loeliger
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 03:57, Peter Pearse wrote: > Here git -M has decided that a new file > > board/arm/arm.S > > is actually a modified old file > > cpu/arm926ejs/versatile/reset.S Eh, don't worry about that. Git is just using a heuristic to guess where that file might have come from, as

Re: [U-Boot-Users] DaVinci DM644x timer problem (divided by 16)

2008-03-20 Thread Dirk Behme
Pieter Voorthuijsen wrote: > Hello, > > Some months ago, a patch was submitted ([ARM] fix timer overflow in > DaVinci). The result was that in /cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/timer.c > read_timer was divided by 16. > > http://www.denx.de/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=u-boot.git;a=commit;h=ea686f52e4 > 5b3df293886

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Don't use last 256 bytes of SDRAM, workaround for 440EPx CHIP 11 errata

2008-03-20 Thread Stefan Roese
On Thursday 20 March 2008, Dave Littell wrote: > This may not be the "better, more generic solution", but I just added a > CONFIG_CHIP_11_ERRATA option and code in lib_ppc/board.c to trim off > only 256 bytes before the optional log buffer is carved out. OK. I'll submit a similar patch in a short

[U-Boot-Users] The truth to gaining inches

2008-03-20 Thread harris velazquez
Have a larger, thicker and more muscular tool today. http://www.umbaratas.com/ Girl next door enjoys being naughty- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/2] DM644x: This adds support for the Prodrive PMDRA board, based on a DM6441

2008-03-20 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 12:28 Thu 20 Mar , Pieter Voorthuijsen wrote: > Hello, > > This patch adds support for the new Prodrive PMDR-A board. It is based > on the DaVinci DM6441 processor, has 256M DDR2, 8M NOR and 256M of NAND. > (This requires the previous patch that removes board specific code from > /cpu/arm92

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Don't use last 256 bytes of SDRAM, workaround for 440EPx CHIP 11 errata

2008-03-20 Thread Stefan Roese
On Thursday 20 March 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > At the cost of an #ifdef, this could be added to the memory > reservation code in "lib_ppc/board.c", i. e. somewhere after > > ... > 427 * Reserve memory at end of RAM for (top down in that order): > 428 * - kernel log buffer >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] very slow netconsole

2008-03-20 Thread Stefano Babic
Antonello Lombardinilo wrote: > I just now: > - switched to Intel IXDPG425 board (to have a "standard" board reference); > - downloaded and compiled u-Boot 1.3.2 with NetConsole support; > > Even in this scenario the communication is slow ! Take a look at your ethernet driver (I think cpu/ixp

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Is it easy to config BR1/OR1 as SDRAM in u-boot?

2008-03-20 Thread solaz
You are right. I checked the TQM8260 and found several interesting things. Thank you very much. solaz wd wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> >> How can I modify the u-boot source code for the mpc8260ads family to let >> u-boot recognize BR1/OR1 as SDRAM? I don't know how

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Don't use last 256 bytes of SDRAM, workaround for 440EPx CHIP 11 errata

2008-03-20 Thread Kumar Gala
On Mar 20, 2008, at 6:16 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> >> I don't like this either. But I have not come up with a "generic" >> solution >> till now. It's not so easy since the 440EPx SDRAM setup code is >> sometimes >> common (cpu/ppc4xx/denali_spd_ddr

[U-Boot-Users] DaVinci DM644x timer problem (divided by 16)

2008-03-20 Thread Pieter Voorthuijsen
Hello, Some months ago, a patch was submitted ([ARM] fix timer overflow in DaVinci). The result was that in /cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/timer.c read_timer was divided by 16. http://www.denx.de/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=u-boot.git;a=commit;h=ea686f52e4 5b3df2938866d3f5a98bb2556dfe2b Right now, when I have

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] lwmon5 dspic POST spezification

2008-03-20 Thread Sascha Laue
Ups. Best regards Sascha Laue diff -u -r -N u-boot/post/board/lwmon5/sysmon.c u-boot-mod/post/board/lwmon5/sysmon.c --- u-boot/post/board/lwmon5/sysmon.c 2008-03-19 15:33:26.0 +0100 +++ u-boot-mod/post/board/lwmon5/sysmon.c 2008-03-20 08:55:10.0 +0100 @@ -34,9 +34,10 @@

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] lwmon5 dspic POST spezification

2008-03-20 Thread Markus Klotzbücher
Dear Sascha, "Sascha Laue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > we modified the specification for the lwmon5 board dspic POST. > Additionally I have add defines for the temperature- and voltagevalues. > > Signed-of-by: Sascha Laue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Signed-of-by: Marcel Brasch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Don't use last 256 bytes of SDRAM, workaround for 440EPx CHIP 11 errata

2008-03-20 Thread Dave Littell
Stefan Roese wrote: > Hi Wolfgang, > > On Thursday 20 March 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>> This patch adds this workaround for the following 440EPx boards: >>> sequoia, lwmon5. Others should probably follow this example. >> OK, the default configs for Sequoia doesn't use shared log buffer, and >>

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] lwmon5 dspic POST spezification

2008-03-20 Thread Sascha Laue
Hi all, we modified the specification for the lwmon5 board dspic POST. Additionally I have add defines for the temperature- and voltagevalues. Signed-of-by: Sascha Laue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-of-by: Marcel Brasch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> @@ -34,9 +34,10 @@ * The test passes when all the follow

Re: [U-Boot-Users] very slow netconsole

2008-03-20 Thread Antonello Lombardinilo
I just now: - switched to Intel IXDPG425 board (to have a "standard" board reference); - downloaded and compiled u-Boot 1.3.2 with NetConsole support; Even in this scenario the communication is slow ! Best Regards, Antonello Lombardinilo Wolfgang Denk writes: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/2] DM644x: This adds support for the Prodrive PMDRA board, based on a DM6441

2008-03-20 Thread Peter Pearse
Considering for u-boot-arm, unless another ARM custodian wants it? Regards Peter > -Original Message- > From: Pieter Voorthuijsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 20 March 2008 11:29 > To: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Cc: Peter Pearse > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] DM644x: This adds su

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/2] DM644x: This adds support for the Prodrive PMDRA board, based on a DM6441

2008-03-20 Thread Pieter Voorthuijsen
Hello, This patch adds support for the new Prodrive PMDR-A board. It is based on the DaVinci DM6441 processor, has 256M DDR2, 8M NOR and 256M of NAND. (This requires the previous patch that removes board specific code from /cpu/arm926ejs/davinci) Best regards, Pieter Signed-off-by: Pieter Voort

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] DM644x: This patch removes all board specific code from the arch. part for DM644x (DaVinci) boards

2008-03-20 Thread Pieter Voorthuijsen
Hello, In the current implementation of the DM644x (DaVinci) achitecture there is a lot of code in the /cpu/arm926ejs/davinci folder that is meant to be board specific. I'm talking about EMIF timing/width configuration for NAND and NOR but also DRAM timing settings which are of course different fo

Re: [U-Boot-Users] very slow netconsole

2008-03-20 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > I have u-boot 1.1.6 running on my board based on IXP425 > processor (266MhZ). ... > Any suggestion ? Try current code? 1.3.2? Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Off

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Don't use last 256 bytes of SDRAM, workaround for 440EPx CHIP 11 errata

2008-03-20 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > I don't like this either. But I have not come up with a "generic" solution > till now. It's not so easy since the 440EPx SDRAM setup code is sometimes > common (cpu/ppc4xx/denali_spd_ddr2.c) and sometimes board specific. And it > gets even more comp

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2 9/9] mpc83xx: enable the SATA interface on mpc837xemds board

2008-03-20 Thread Dave Liu
Enable the first two SATA interfaces on MPC837xEMDS board, The two SATA ports are on LYNX1. (SATA0/1 on J4/5) Signed-off-by: Dave Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/configs/MPC837XEMDS.h | 23 +++ 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/confi

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2 8/9] drivers: Add the support for Freescale SATA controller

2008-03-20 Thread Dave Liu
Add the Freescale on-chip SATA controller driver to u-boot, The SATA controller is used on the 837x and 8315 targets, The driver can be used to load kernel, fs and dtb. The features list: - 1.5/3 Gbps link speed - LBA48, LBA28 support - DMA and FPDMA support - Two ports support Signed-off-by: Dav

[U-Boot-Users] very slow netconsole

2008-03-20 Thread Antonello Lombardinilo
I have u-boot 1.1.6 running on my board based on IXP425 processor (266MhZ). I trying to use netconsole. I readed doc/README.NetConsole and make connection with u-boot. On u-boot I do: setenv nc 'setenv stdout nc;setenv stdin nc' setenv ncip 192.168.1.5:1234 saveenv run nc On host PC (

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Don't use last 256 bytes of SDRAM, workaround for 440EPx CHIP 11 errata

2008-03-20 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Wolfgang, On Thursday 20 March 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > This patch adds this workaround for the following 440EPx boards: > > sequoia, lwmon5. Others should probably follow this example. > > OK, the default configs for Sequoia doesn't use shared log buffer, and > the lwmon5 uses CONFIG_ALT

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2 7/9] mpc83xx: enable serdes1 for 837x SATA

2008-03-20 Thread Dave Liu
enable serdes1(LYNX1) for 837x SATA interface Signed-off-by: Dave Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- board/freescale/mpc837xemds/mpc837xemds.c |3 +++ include/configs/MPC837XEMDS.h |9 + 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/board/freescale/mpc837xem

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2 6/9] mpc83xx: serdes setup routines

2008-03-20 Thread Dave Liu
From: Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This patch adds few routines to configure serdes on 837x targets. Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- cpu/mpc83xx/Makefile |2 +- cpu/mpc83xx/serdes.c | 156 ++ include/asm-p

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2 5/9] ATA: Add the readme for SATA command line

2008-03-20 Thread Dave Liu
Signed-off-by: Dave Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- doc/README.sata | 69 +++ 1 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 doc/README.sata diff --git a/doc/README.sata b/doc/README.sata new file mode 100644 index 000..

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2 4/9] ATA: enable the sata init on bootup

2008-03-20 Thread Dave Liu
Signed-off-by: Dave Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- lib_ppc/board.c |8 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib_ppc/board.c b/lib_ppc/board.c index ee0213e..5e466fa 100644 --- a/lib_ppc/board.c +++ b/lib_ppc/board.c @@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ #if defined(CONFIG_CMD_IDE)

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2 3/9] ATA: Add the fis struct for SATA

2008-03-20 Thread Dave Liu
Signed-off-by: Dave Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/fis.h | 156 + 1 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/fis.h diff --git a/include/fis.h b/include/fis.h new file mode 100644 index 000..2040b

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2 2/9] ATA: Add the libata support

2008-03-20 Thread Dave Liu
add simple libata support in u-boot Signed-off-by: Dave Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/block/Makefile |1 + drivers/block/libata.c | 158 include/libata.h | 207 3 files changed, 366 insertions(

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2 1/9] ATA: Add the support for SATA framework

2008-03-20 Thread Dave Liu
1. Add the SATA framework 2. Add the SATA command line Signed-off-by: Dave Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- common/Makefile|1 + common/cmd_sata2.c | 206 disk/part.c| 14 disk/part_dos.c|2 + disk/part_iso.c|

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH V2 0/9] SATA framework and FSL SATA support patch set

2008-03-20 Thread Dave Liu
Hello all, The patch set include two parts: 1. SATA framework support 2. The Freescale SATA controller support I hope these patches to go v1.3.3. Thanks, Dave The following changes since commit 23e20aa6488e6c0622496549861bfdc74108debe: Yuri Tikhonov (1): lwmon5: Fix register test logi

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Don't use last 256 bytes of SDRAM, workaround for 440EPx CHIP 11 errata

2008-03-20 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Hello Stefan, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Since 440EPx/GRx has problems with accessing the last 256 bytes of SDRAM via > the Denali DDR/DDR2 controller, we set CONFIG_PRAM to 1 and reserve 1kByte > of protected RAM. This way this memory will not get "touched" by U-Boot. And > by pa

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Don't use last 256 bytes of SDRAM, workaround for 440EPx CHIP 11 errata

2008-03-20 Thread Stefan Roese
Since 440EPx/GRx has problems with accessing the last 256 bytes of SDRAM via the Denali DDR/DDR2 controller, we set CONFIG_PRAM to 1 and reserve 1kByte of protected RAM. This way this memory will not get "touched" by U-Boot. And by passing "mem=${mem}" to the Linux kernel, Linux will not use this a

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] [ARM] [RESUBMIT] Move ARM supplied dev boards to new board/arm directory

2008-03-20 Thread Peter Pearse
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 19 March 2008 20:16 > To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > Cc: Peter Pearse; U-Boot-Users > Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] [ARM] [RESUBMIT] Move ARM > supplied dev boards to new board/arm directory

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] PPC405EP Set EMAC noise filter bits

2008-03-20 Thread Markus Brunner
This bug was introduced with commit aee747f19b460a0e9da20ff21e90fdaac1cec359 which enabled CFG_4xx_GPIO_TABLE for PPC405 and unintentionally disabled the setting of the emac noise filter bits for PPC405EP when CFG_4xx_GPIO_TABLE is set. Signed-off-by: Markus Brunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- dif