On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:26:45AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 08:16:45PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:10:55 +0300
> > Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > > > -/* VSC7385 Gigabit Switch support */
> > > > > +/*
> > > > > + * VSC7385 Gigabit Switch support
> > > > > + */
> > > > > +#define CFG_VSC7385_BASE     0xF0000000
> > > > 
> > > > What does this have to do with NAND?
> > > 
> > > Nothing. I'm expanding VSC7385 comment to better separate it from
> > > the NAND code. Most lengthy parts of the RDB config are using
> > > 
> > > /*
> > >  *
> > >  */
> > > 
> > > as a logical separator. So did I.
> > 
> > that's fine, it just makes patch review easier and less susceptible to
> > comments like this if you keep your patches on-subject.
> 
> To be fair, the main reason for the comment was that I missed this line:
> -#define CFG_VSC7385_BASE     0xF0000000
> 
> way at the top of the diff, and thought the patch was introducing the
> #define rather than just reformatting the comment.

Nothing was introduced, but moved around. Anyway, I'll just drop it
on the next resend.

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

Reply via email to