Re: [U-Boot-Users] NOR flash S29WS-N: buffered write doesn't work

Hi Guennadi, On Friday 28 March 2008, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: I've got the following problem: on a system with the Spansion S29WS256N NOR flash the buffered write mode doesn't work. Attempts to use CFG_FLASH_USE_BUFFER_WRITE produce Writing to Flash... Flash buffer write timeout at

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for 16bit legacy AMD flash

Add entry for 512Kx16 AMD flash to jedec_table. Read out 16bit device id if chipwidth is 16bit Signed-off-by: Tor Krill [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c | 44 +++- drivers/mtd/jedec_flash.c | 19 +++ 2 files changed, 54

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Release status - open patches, pull requests etc.

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 March 2008 22:16 To: Dirk Behme Cc: Peter Pearse; u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] Release status - open patches, pull requests etc. Dear Dirk, in message [EMAIL

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Release status - open patches, pull requests etc.

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: [PATCH] DM644x: This patch removes all boardspecific code from the arch. part for DM644x (DaVinci) boards [PATCH] DM644x: (2nd try) This adds support fortheProdrivePMDRA board, based on a DM6441 Awaiting resubmission after

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2 4/7] add SMSC LAN9x1x Network driver

On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 02:23:44PM -0400, Nick Droogh wrote: Hi Everyone, Would this driver work with the LAN9218 chip as well? The chips in this family differ in that some of them have an integrated phy and others not. Some have a 16bit bus interface and others have a 32bit bus interface. So

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for 16bit legacy AMD flash

On Friday 28 March 2008, Tor Krill wrote: Add entry for 512Kx16 AMD flash to jedec_table. Read out 16bit device id if chipwidth is 16bit Signed-off-by: Tor Krill [EMAIL PROTECTED] Looks good. Just some nitpicking comments below. --- drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c | 44

[U-Boot-Users] how to enable if, then command support in uboot

Hi all, I am trying to execute some commands stored in environment as below #define CONFIG_EXTRA_ENV_SETTINGS \ boot_mmc= \ if mmcinit \ fatload mmc 0 ${ramfs_addr} ${ramfs_file} \ fatload

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v4] ppc: Add CFG_MEM_TOP_HIDE option to hide memory area that doesn't get touched

On Thursday 27 March 2008, Larry Johnson wrote: It's clear now, but unfortunately I don't know enough to tell whether it is also correct :-( . The statement as now written implies that the statement without the clause, i.e., Only Linux board ports in arch/powerpc with bootwrapper support will

Re: [U-Boot-Users] how to enable if, then command support in uboot

add missing info Uboot version : 1.3.1 for ARM926EJS processor based board using arm toolchain from CodeSourcery Regards Gururaja -Original Message- From: Gururaja Hebbar K R Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 6:37 PM To: 'u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net' Subject: how to enable if, then

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for 16bit legacy AMD flash, V2

Add entry for 512Kx16 AMD flash to jedec_table. Read out 16bit device id if chipwidth is 16bit. Fixed coding style after Stefans feedback Signed-off-by: Tor Krill [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c | 44 +++- drivers/mtd/jedec_flash.c | 19

[U-Boot-Users] bootloader

Hi Gururaja, I am Gautham here, i am trying to port linux on PXA255 , I have initialized the lowlevel initialization , but serial port is not getting initialized. Please help out . With Regards, Gautham - Check out the

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Release status - open patches, pull requests etc.

Wolfgang Denk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please come forward now if you have submitted any patches that should go into 1.3.3 but are not in the master branch yet. Just FYI, I don't have any patches queued up for avr32 this time. If anyone thinks I've missed something, please speak up. Oh, and

Re: [U-Boot-Users] ppc4xx: gpio setup broken for ppc405ep

On Thursday 27 March 2008, M B wrote: I found some bugs for the gpio setup for ppc405ep and was about to fix them. After i fixed them (for 405ep) I realised that it's rather impossible to have a function like gpio_set_chip_configuration to setup the gpios for all ppc4xx, without turning it

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Current U-Boot doesn't boot device tree enabled kernel anymore

On Thursday 27 March 2008, Bartlomiej Sieka wrote: It's because we assume that if the image got overwritten, its contents can't be trusted anymore, and abort booting. Old U-Boot didn't care about overwrites, which sometimes worked out OK, and sometimes didn't, the latter case resulting in

Re: [U-Boot-Users] how to enable if, then command support in uboot

Gururaja Hebbar K R [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: #define CONFIG_EXTRA_ENV_SETTINGS \ boot_mmc= \ if mmcinit \ fatload mmc 0 ${ramfs_addr} ${ramfs_file} \

[U-Boot-Users] Rich and famous - exposed

re: party time http://www.swijuing.com/ Achieve rock solid erections and intense, unbelievable pleasure during lovemaking with this. - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell

[U-Boot-Users] u-boot

hi! i compiled a new u-boot for my card(u-boot 1.2.0) and load it with xmodem when i try to exec a new kernel at any adress i have this message : bad magic adress what can be the problem? thanks - Check out the new

Re: [U-Boot-Users] MPC83xx HRCW

Andre Schwarz wrote: Jerry Van Baren schrieb: Andre Schwarz wrote: In cpu/mpc83xx/start.S there is a comment : /* * The Hard Reset Configuration Word (HRCW) table is in the first 64 * (0x40) bytes of flash. It has 8 bytes, but each byte is repeated 8 * times so the processor can fetch

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/13] SPARC: Added SPARC board information to bdinfo command

Hello Wolfgang, This patch adds support for the U-Boot command 'bdinfo' for SPARC boards, the output is as shown below. ## U-Boot 1.3.2-00273-gf85e20a (Mar 28 2008 - 13:13:48)GAISLER LEON3 GR-XC3S-1500 CPU: LEON3 Board: GRSIM/TSIM Using default environment In:serial

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 7/13] SPARC: Added GRETH Ethernet 10/100/1000 support for LEON3

Hello Wolfgang, GRETH is an Ethernet 10/100 or 10/100/1000 MAC with out without a debug link (EDCL). The GRETH core is documented in GRIP.pdf available at www.gaisler.com. If the GRETH has GigaBit support (GBIT, Scatter gather, checksum offloading etc.) can be determined by a bit in the control

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 8/13] SPARC: Added SMC91111 support for LEON2 and LEON3 processors

Hello Wolfgang, This patch makes SPARC/LEON processors able to read and write to the SMC9 chip using the chip external I/O bus of the memory controller. This patchs defines the standard in and out macros expected by the SMC9111 driver. To access that I/O bus one must set up the memory

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 9/13] SPARC: Added LEON3 board GR-XC3S-1500.

Hello Wolfgang, This patch adds support for the LEON3 board: * GR-XC3S-1500 (Low cost Xilinx Spartan FPGA board) Note that by board support I mean support for the pre synthezied template design for the board. Supporting any configuration is not possible but almost, due to the Plug Play

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 10/13] SPARC: Added support for LEON3 TSIM/GRSIM simulator.

Hello Wolfgang, This patch adds support for the LEON3 simulators TSIM and GRSIM. The simulators GRSIM and TSIM for LEON3 has been added as a board. A separate board is needed due to that the FLASH CFI interface has not been implemented in the simulators. Configuring the GR-XC3S-1500 board

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 12/13] SPARC: Added LEON3 AX board GR-CPCI-AX2000.

Hello Wolfgang, This patch adds support for the LEON3 board: * GR-CPCI-AX2000 (AX system with switchable AX FPGA) Note that by board support I mean support for the pre synthezied template design for the board. Supporting any configuration is not possible but almost, due to the Plug Play

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 4/13] SPARC: Added support for SPARC/LEON3

Hello Wolfgang, This patch adds support for SPARC/LEON3 to U-Boot. LEON3 boards are added in separate patches. This patch does not support LEON3 SMP system. Linux for SPARC assumes that there is a Sun Boot prom available. The boot prom is used as monitor to support basic features such as

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] SPARC: CFI flash_read64 defined weak function.

Hello Wolfgang and Stefan, This is a patch which defines flash_read64 weak in cfi_flash.c, cpu/leon3/cpu_init.c defines this function for SPARC. SPARC has implemented __raw_readq, it reads 64-bit from any 32-bit address. For current SPARC architectures (LEON2 and LEON3) each read from the

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix host tool build breakage, take two

Even with this patch I'm still having issues: gcc -g -Wall -idirafter /tmp/u-boot-85xx/include -idirafter /tmp/u- boot-85xx/include2 -idirafter /tmp/u-boot-85xx/include - DTEXT_BASE=0xfff8 -DUSE_HOSTCC -O -c -o image.o image.c In file included from image.c:73: /usr/include/md5.h:27: error:

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v3] sh: Add support Renesas Solutions R2D plus board

R2D plus is SH reference board used with SH7751R. This board has 266Mhz CPU, 64MB SDRAM, Cardbus, CF interface, one PCI bus, VGA, and two Ethernet controller. Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- MAINTAINERS |1 + MAKEALL |1 +

Re: [U-Boot-Users] how to enable if, then command support in uboot

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: even from command line if i give uboot$ if mmcinit then echo fi i get above option now i hvae to press ctrl+c to interrupt and come back to prompt ... kindly let me know how to solve this. Maybe you should learn shell syntax ? Best regards,

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add Vitesse 8601 support to TSEC driver

Add phy_info for Vitesse VSC8601. Add config option, CFG_VSC8601_SKEWFIX, to enable RGMII skew timing compensation. Signed-off-by: Tor Krill [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/net/tsec.c | 30 ++ drivers/net/tsec.h |5 + 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 0

Re: [U-Boot-Users] u-boot

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: i compiled a new u-boot for my card(u-boot 1.2.0) and load it with xmodem when i try to exec a new kernel at any adress i have this message : bad magic adress what can be the problem? There are at least two problems: 1) You did not use mkimage to

Re: [U-Boot-Users] bootloader

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Gautham here, I am trying to port uboot on PXA255 , initialized all the lowlevel initializations. From start.S it is going to start_armboot and after that they are calling serial_init , but i am not getting any banner or any intimation.Totallyserial

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/13] SPARC: Added support for generic SPARC architecture.

Dear Daniel, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: This patch adds support for the SPARC achitecture. I received the patches you sent directly to me, but none through the mailing list - except the first one, which got stuck in moderation, and which I had to reject. The maximum message size

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Make MPC83xx one step closer to full relocation.

Remove a few absolute references to CFG_MONITOR_BASE for ppc/mpc83xx and use GOT relative reference. --- cpu/mpc83xx/start.S | 11 +++ lib_ppc/board.c |3 ++- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S b/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S index

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix host tool build breakage, take two

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Even with this patch I'm still having issues: gcc -g -Wall -idirafter /tmp/u-boot-85xx/include -idirafter /tmp/u- boot-85xx/include2 -idirafter /tmp/u-boot-85xx/include - DTEXT_BASE=0xfff8 -DUSE_HOSTCC -O -c -o image.o image.c In file included

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Release status - open patches, pull requests etc.

Wolfgang Denk wrote: Hi everybody, as you are probably aware of, we have only 4 more days with an open merge window left (the merge window for 1.3.3 is open until Mar 31, 23:59:59 MET). I think I have now applied (or rejected) all patches I felt responsible for myself, i. e.

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v4] ppc: Add CFG_MEM_TOP_HIDE option to hide memory area that doesn't get touched

Stefan Roese wrote: On Thursday 27 March 2008, Larry Johnson wrote: It's clear now, but unfortunately I don't know enough to tell whether it is also correct :-( . The statement as now written implies that the statement without the clause, i.e., Only Linux board ports in arch/powerpc with

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] mpc83xx: unreinvent mem_clk

delete ddr_clk and use mem_clk instead. Rename other ddr_*_clk to mem_*_clk for consistency's sake. Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- cpu/mpc83xx/spd_sdram.c | 10 +- cpu/mpc83xx/speed.c | 16 include/asm-ppc/global_data.h |3 +--

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/3] mpc83xx: display ddr frequency in board_add_ram_info banner

Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- cpu/mpc83xx/spd_sdram.c | 11 +++ 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpu/mpc83xx/spd_sdram.c b/cpu/mpc83xx/spd_sdram.c index c9151d7..97ac7bb 100644 --- a/cpu/mpc83xx/spd_sdram.c +++ b/cpu/mpc83xx/spd_sdram.c

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/3] mpc83xx: cleanup System Part and Revision ID Register (SPRIDR) code

in the spirit of commit 1ced121600b2060ab2ff9f0fddd9421fd70a0dc6, 85xx's Update SVR numbers to expand support, simplify SPRIDR processing and processor ID display. Add REVID_{MAJ,MIN}OR macros to make REVID dependent code simpler. Also added PARTID_NO_E and IS_E_PROCESSOR convenience macros.

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/3] mpc83xx: cleanup System Part and Revision ID Register (SPRIDR) code

+struct cpu_type { + char name[15]; + u32 partid; +}; + +#define CPU_TYPE_ENTRY(x) {#x, SPR_##x} + +struct cpu_type cpu_type_list [] = { + CPU_TYPE_ENTRY(8311), + CPU_TYPE_ENTRY(8313), + CPU_TYPE_ENTRY(8314), + CPU_TYPE_ENTRY(8315), +

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Release status - open patches, pull requests etc.

Wolfgang Denk wrote: Hi everybody, as you are probably aware of, we have only 4 more days with an open merge window left (the merge window for 1.3.3 is open until Mar 31, 23:59:59 MET). I think I have now applied (or rejected) all patches I felt responsible for myself, i.

[U-Boot-Users] LZMA support

Hi people, I have a stupid question: why does u-boot not support the LZMA algorithm? (Anyway, I have a self-made and untested patch that introduces this compression algorithm). Thanks a lot. luigi Industrie Dial Face S.p.A. Luigi Mantellini RD - Software Industrie Dial Face S.p.A. Via Canzo,

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix host tool build breakage, take two

On Mar 28, 2008, at 9:45 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: In message EB0C2999-8BB8-4F0E-B3E4- [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Even with this patch I'm still having issues: gcc -g -Wall -idirafter /tmp/u-boot-85xx/include -idirafter /tmp/u- boot-85xx/include2 -idirafter /tmp/u-boot-85xx/include -

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Move init_sequence table into code.

Global variables are not ideal before relocation to RAM. --- I hope this still applies. lib_ppc/board.c | 144 +- 1 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib_ppc/board.c b/lib_ppc/board.c index 8a18350..c64bbd5 100644

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] get_vfatname

Hi, Wolfgang Denk wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: I find a problem related to the get_vfatname function. This is my proposal patch. What exactly is the preoblem? Is there a test case that can reproduce the problem? My test case is a 64Mb CF. Maybe I give you a

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] get_vfatname

Hi, Wolfgang Denk wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: I find a problem related to the get_vfatname function. This is my proposal patch. What exactly is the preoblem? Is there a test case that can reproduce the problem? My test case is a 64Mb CF. Maybe I give you a

Re: [U-Boot-Users] CS8900 Problem on an ARM system

I made an interesting observation... Out of frustration I dumped all chip's register (luckily, there are only about 20 of them), and what I see there: on first attempts the PolarityOK bit is set, and reception doesn't work. Then after some time the bit gets cleared, and - voila - it works! The

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH][resend] ColdFire: Fix alignment issue after CONFIG_IDENT_STRING in start.S

When the version_string function in start.S is not 4-byte align, it will cause the compiler generates unaligned opcodes detected in executable segment. This issue affects all ColdFire CPUs. By adding .align 4 after CONFIG_IDENT_STRING, it will pad 0's if it is not aligned. Signed-off-by: TsiChung

Re: [U-Boot-Users] MPC83xx HRCW

Hi Andre, In cpu/mpc83xx/start.S there is a comment : /* * The Hard Reset Configuration Word (HRCW) table is in the first 64 * (0x40) bytes of flash. It has 8 bytes, but each byte is repeated 8 * times so the processor can fetch it out of flash whether the flash * is 8, 16, 32, or 64

[U-Boot-Users] Ayssa votre voyante : vous dévoil e les secrets D'amour, Chance, Argent et Sant é

Alyssa vient d'avoir un flash intéressant pour vous. l'intonation de votre voix est nécéssaire . Contactez moi au : 08 92 35 01 06 (France) 0901 901 900 (Suisse) Je vous dévoile les secrets et les surprises. Contactez Alyssa au : 08 92 35 01 06 (France)

Re: [U-Boot-Users] PPC4xx: Build problem in u-boot-ppc4xx

On Friday 28 March 2008, Larry Johnson wrote: You may have found this already, but as of 1600 UTC 28 March, the tip of the u-boot-pcc4xx fork breaks when building U-Boot for the Korat board on my system (Kubuntu 7.10, ELDK 4.1). The tip of the u-boot main repository builds OK. Replacing the

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v4] ppc: Add CFG_MEM_TOP_HIDE option to hide memory area that doesn't get touched

On Friday 28 March 2008, Kumar Gala wrote: This patch enables this config option on some PPC440EPx boards as a workaround for the CHIP 11 errata. Here the description from the AMCC documentation: If you reduce the memory size this way does the 44x kernel have issues with the TLBs that

Re: [U-Boot-Users] LZMA support (patch)

Hi everyone, this patch adds the lzma support with the following constraints: - it doesn't install the LZMA SDK files. I provide the import_lzma.sh script to import the needs file from a lzma sdk release - the imported lzma sdk files are _not touched_ - the lzma support is enabled defining

Re: [U-Boot-Users] LZMA support (patch)

Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini wrote: Hi everyone, this patch adds the lzma support with the following constraints: - it doesn't install the LZMA SDK files. I provide the import_lzma.sh script to import the needs file from a lzma sdk release - the imported lzma sdk files are _not touched_ -

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Release status - open patches, pull requests etc.

On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 9:46 AM, David Saada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wolfgang Denk wrote: Hi everybody, MPC85xx, MPC83xx: Add/Fix UPM configuration support QE IO: Add initial data to pin configuration + read/write functions QE UEC: Add MII Commands QE UEC: Extend number of supported

[U-Boot-Users] Is any i.MX21 board supported?

Hello, I wonder if u-boot supports any i.MX21 board? http://www.denx.de/wiki/UBoot/PatchStatus mentions that PATCH] Support for csb535fs / i.MX21 LiteKit. has been merged in the main tree, but I could not find it. Regards, -- Leon

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 04/13] SPARC: Added support for SPARC LEON3 SOC processor.

Hello Wolfgang, This patch adds support for SPARC/LEON3 to U-Boot. LEON3 boards are added in separate patches. This patch does not support LEON3 SMP system. Linux for SPARC assumes that there is a Sun Boot prom available. The boot prom is used as monitor to support basic features such as

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 06/13] SPARC: Added support for SPARC LEON2 SOC Processor.

Hello Wolfgang, This patch adds support for SPARC/LEON2 to U-Boot. Currently only the LEON2 TSIM and GRSIM simulators are supported, they are added in a separate patch. This patch is also available at ftp://ftp.gaisler.com/gaisler.com/u-boot/patches. Best Regards, Daniel Hellstrom

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 05/13] SPARC/LEON3: Added AMBA Bus PlugPlay information print command (ambapp).

Hello Wolfgang, This patch adds an U-Boot command, ambapp, which prints a summary of AMBA Bus Plug Play information. AMBA is a bus specified by ARM. AMBA with Plug and Play information is a Gaisler extension to that bus. See www.gaisler.com. ## U-Boot 1.3.2-g6bc2ec61-dirty

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 12/13] SPARC/LEON3: added support for GR-CPCI-AX2000 FPGA AX board.

Hello Wolfgang, This patch adds support for the LEON3 board: * GR-CPCI-AX2000 (AX system with switchable AX FPGA) Note that by board support I mean support for the pre synthezied template design for the board. Supporting any configuration is not possible but almost, due to the Plug Play

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] SPARC: CFI flash_read64 is defined a weak function.

Hello Wolfgang and Stefan, SPARC has implemented __raw_readq, it reads 64-bit from any 32-bit address. SPARC CPUs implement flash_read64 which calls __raw_readq. For current SPARC architectures (LEON2 and LEON3) each read from the FLASH must lead to a cache miss. This is because FLASH can not be

Re: [U-Boot-Users] LZMA support (patch)

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: this patch adds the lzma support with the following constraints: - it doesn't install the LZMA SDK files. I provide the import_lzma.sh script to import the needs file from a lzma sdk release Sorry, but I will not accept this. U-Boot has always

[U-Boot-Users] [Fwd: Re: LZMA support (patch)]

Hi Wolfgang, In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: this patch adds the lzma support with the following constraints: - it doesn't install the LZMA SDK files. I provide the import_lzma.sh script to import the needs file from a lzma sdk release Sorry, but I will not accept this.

Re: [U-Boot-Users] MPC83xx HRCW

Hi André, I was just wondering why there's a need to define the HRCW inside a header. This _only_ makes sense for the HRCW from flash on local bus-section. Any hard coded reset word or the use of an I2C Prom does make this obsolete. Right. But there is also no harm in having it :) My

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] mpc83xx: enable the SATA interface on mpc8315 rdb and mpc837x rdb boards

Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- include/configs/MPC8315ERDB.h | 23 +++ include/configs/MPC837XERDB.h | 23 +++ 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/MPC8315ERDB.h

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/3] mpc83xx: cleanup System Part and Revision ID Register (SPRIDR) code

On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 21:01:30 +0100 Joakim Tjernlund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW, what happened to relocation stuff Grant was doing? It is still disabled, I never had any problems so perhaps time to turn it on again? it might even make u-boot smaller once all the old manuel relocation code

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Update CONFIG_PCIAUTO_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE to related boards

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Let me know what is your decision; however, I still do not see the need adding CONFIG_PCIAUTO_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE to MPC5200 base boards that are not supporting PCI. Agreed. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD:

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/3] mpc83xx: cleanup System Part and Revision ID Register (SPRIDR) code

On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Kim Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 21:01:30 +0100 Joakim Tjernlund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW, what happened to relocation stuff Grant was doing? It is still disabled, I never had any problems so perhaps time to turn it on

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/3] mpc83xx: cleanup System Part and Revision ID Register (SPRIDR) code

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grant Likely Sent: den 29 mars 2008 00:12 To: Kim Phillips Cc: Joakim Tjernlund; u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/3] mpc83xx: cleanup System Part and Revision ID

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Make MPC83xx one step closer to full relocation.

On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:41:25 +0100 Joakim Tjernlund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Remove a few absolute references to CFG_MONITOR_BASE for ppc/mpc83xx and use GOT relative reference. --- cpu/mpc83xx/start.S | 11 +++ lib_ppc/board.c |3 ++- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5

[U-Boot-Users] Please pull u-boot-mpc83xx.git

Wolfgang D., please pull SATA configuration patches for 8315 and 837x boards, a cleanup of the 83xx SPRIDR code, and some 8323 rdb fixes: The following changes since commit 74d1e66d22dac91388bc538b2fe19f735edc5b82: Bartlomiej Sieka (1): Fix host tool build breakage, take two are

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] get_vfatname

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: What exactly is the preoblem? Is there a test case that can reproduce the problem? My test case is a 64Mb CF. Maybe I give you a link :) as soon as possible. The problem is that the code doesn't look if the dir_slot contain a long name. If

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Make MPC83xx one step closer to full relocation.

On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 00:47:01 +0100 Joakim Tjernlund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: Kim Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: den 29 mars 2008 00:33 To: Joakim Tjernlund Cc: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make MPC83xx one step

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Make MPC83xx one step closer to full relocation.

-Original Message- From: Kim Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: den 29 mars 2008 01:01 To: Joakim Tjernlund Cc: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make MPC83xx one step closer to full relocation. On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 00:47:01 +0100 Joakim Tjernlund

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Please pull u-boot-mpc83xx.git

On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:49:59 -0500 Kim Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wolfgang D., please pull SATA configuration patches for 8315 and 837x boards, a cleanup of the 83xx SPRIDR code, and some 8323 rdb fixes: ok, I've pushed Joakim's relocation fixes patch. New summary looks like: Dave

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Release status - open patches, pull requests etc.

On 09:28 Fri 28 Mar , Peter Pearse wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 March 2008 09:11 To: Peter Pearse Cc: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] Release status - open patches, pull requests

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] remove remaining CONFIG_OF_HAS_{UBOOT_ENV, BD_T} code

Kim Phillips wrote: finish off what commit 43ddd9c820fec44816188f53346b464e20b3142d, Remove deprecated CONFIG_OF_HAS_UBOOT_ENV and CONFIG_OF_HAS_BD_T started. Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This one's for you, Wolfgang. README| 13 --

Re: [U-Boot-Users] LZMA support (patch)

On Friday 28 March 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote: But so far there is no code (board support) in U-Boot to use this feature, right? And it's not used by the Linux kernel either? And your patch does not even enable support for it in the mkimage tool, so you cannot even create images that use

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 4/7] add SMSC LAN9x1x Network driver

On Wednesday 26 March 2008, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: From: Sascha Hauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] This patch adds a driver for the following smsc network controllers: LAN9115 LAN9116 LAN9117 LAN9215 LAN9216 LAN9217 is this like the smsc911x.c in the kernel ? i'm interested in whether this

[U-Boot-Users] [cfi-flash] Please pull git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-cfi-flash.git

The following changes since commit 74d1e66d22dac91388bc538b2fe19f735edc5b82: Bartlomiej Sieka (1): Fix host tool build breakage, take two are available in the git repository at: git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-cfi-flash.git master Tor Krill (1): MTD/CFI: Add support for 16bit