Wolfgang Denk wrote:
* U-Boot mailing list traffic:
2858 05/27 wangjiankun820624 [U-Boot-Users] MIPS: about the function of
the octeon_twsi_set_addr8
- for MIPS custodian
I'm happy to know there is Octeon port, but I guess that's a local
version provided from Cavium Networks to
Hi Wolfgang,
welcome back...
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Replace COBJS-y with appropriate driver config names.
Signed-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Changes v2:
* Kill more CONFIG_CMD_NET and CONFIG_NET_MULTI defines from
-
Kumar Gala-3 wrote:
This is a series of patches that are a work-in-progress towards a new
DDR initialization for the Freescale 8{3,5,6}xxx devices that have a
common DDR controller.
Kumar,
Does this RFC also include support for identifying and initializing more than
one DDR module?
David.
Hi Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Hi everybody,
here is a summary of the current state of my processing of patches
that have been submitted for the upcoming 1.3.4 release.
As you might have noticed, I've been on vacation for the last two
weeks, and I spent this time (intentionally)
Dear Ben,
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
3645 06/11 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] net: sh: Renesas
SH7763 Ethernet device support
- for net custodian
Didn't pick this up because it was after what I thought was the cut-off
of 6/10. It still has
[PATCH] add new 'unzip' command to u-boot commandline
common/cmd_mem.c: new command unzip srcaddr dstaddr [dstsize] to unzip from
memory to memory, and option CONFIG_CMD_UNZIP to enable it
Signed-off-by: Werner Almesberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Harald Welte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff
Kumar Gala-3 wrote:
This is a series of patches that are a work-in-progress towards a new
DDR initialization for the Freescale 8{3,5,6}xxx devices that have a
common DDR controller.
(Sorry for the previous no subject message - hit the send too soon...)
Kumar,
Does this RFC also include
[PATCH] add new NAND_DONT_CRATE_BBT flag
This patch makes creation of the BBT optional.
It adds a new platform-independent NAND-wide flag NAND_DONT_CREATE_BBT
This flag can be used by the board_nand_init function of a board. It is used
by the soon-to-be-submitted board support code for various
[PATCH] add explicit bbt creation to commandline (nand createbbt command)
This patch adds user-requested BBT creation. It includes the following changes:
- common/cmd_nand.c: move yes/no decision to separate function
- do_nand: ask for confirmation for nand erase
- do_nand: add command nand
Signed-off-by: Matvejchikov Ilya [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
board/freescale/mpc8260ads/mpc8260ads.c | 27 +++
cpu/mpc8260/pci.c | 12
include/configs/MPC8260ADS.h|7 +++
3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Dear Harald,
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
[PATCH] add 'license' command to u-boot command line
The 'license' command includes the u-boot license (GPLv2) into the actual
bootloader binary. The license text can be shown interactively at the u-boot
commandline.
When we started
Wolfgang,
4000 06/18 Magnus Lilja [U-Boot-Users] i.MX31: mx31_gpio_mux() problem
- do nothing; waiting for resubmit
I submitted patches to this problem in two posts with the following subjects:
[PATCH 1/2] i.MX31: Fix IOMUX related typos (June 23:rd)
[PATCH 2/2] i.MX31: Fix
Signed-off-by: Matvejchikov Ilya [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
board/cm5200/cm5200.c |2 +-
board/ids8247/ids8247.c |2 +-
board/mgcoge/mgcoge.c |6 +++---
board/mgsuvd/mgsuvd.c |8
4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/cm5200/cm5200.c
On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 00:32 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
So what *is* the state of this?
If nobody responds soon, I will indeed re-apply that patch, andthen I
will not revert this commit again. So if you think this bytes you,
please speak
Hi Wolfgang!
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 12:11:05PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
[PATCH] add 'license' command to u-boot command line
The 'license' command includes the u-boot license (GPLv2) into the actual
bootloader binary. The license text can
On 13:42 Sun 06 Jul , Shinya Kuribayashi wrote:
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Hm... Are you absolutely sure your changes, especially the
CONFIG_CMD_NET and even more the CONFIG_NET_MULTI related ones, do not
cause any trouble on any systems?
[...]
It seems not obvious to me that your
On 16:04 Sun 06 Jul , Harald Welte wrote:
[PATCH] add explicit bbt creation to commandline (nand createbbt command)
This patch adds user-requested BBT creation. It includes the following
changes:
- common/cmd_nand.c: move yes/no decision to separate function
- do_nand: ask for
On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 00:32:03 +0200
Wolfgang Denk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will you apply this in your repo and send me a pull request, or do you
want me to pick this up directly?
Please pick it up directly. I'm on vacation, so it may take some time
before I get around to pushing it anywhere.
Hi again
diff --git a/board/tqc/tqma31/Makefile b/board/tqc/tqma31/Makefile
new file mode 100644
index 000..ed403e8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/board/tqc/tqma31/Makefile
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+#
+# Copyright (C) 2008, Guennadi Liakhovetski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+# Copyright (C) 2008, Jens Gehrlein
On 01:05 Sun 06 Jul , Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Hi everybody,
here is a summary of the current state of my processing of patches
that have been submitted for the upcoming 1.3.4 release.
As you might have noticed, I've been on vacation for the last two
weeks, and I spent this time
Hi, Wolfgang.
On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 01:05:40 +0200
Wolfgang Denk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3910 06/17 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/9] sh: Cleanup source
code of MS7720SE
3911 06/17 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/9] sh: Cleanup source
code of MS7722SE
3912
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Wolfgang Denk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I added code to handle the 011 chip, but I really didn't think anyone
would be interested in it.
I think all such changes should get added to the public repository.
If someone
On Jul 5, 2008, at 5:32 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message Pine.LNX.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
The current cpu identification code is used just to return the name
of the processor at boot. There are some other locations that the
name
is useful (device tree setup).
Also, we add a
Hi!
I've first sent this on Feb 17, 2007. Unfortunately no reply was
received. I think this is a quite useful feature, since a compile time
offset into the NAND flash for the environment just doesn't work well
with bad blocks ;)
This is the current version of the patch. I'd love to see it
On Jul 6, 2008, at 3:04 AM, David Saada wrote:
Kumar Gala-3 wrote:
This is a series of patches that are a work-in-progress towards a
new
DDR initialization for the Freescale 8{3,5,6}xxx devices that have a
common DDR controller.
(Sorry for the previous no subject message - hit the
I meanwhile realized that the entire makefile system doesn't really cope
with the fact. So what I'm left with is something along the lines of
the attached patch, where the cpu/arm920t/start.S #includes a
cpu/arm920t/s3c24x0/start.S file.
It's not really nice, but otherwise I assure you anyone
Hi!
I'm spending the better part of this day to finally put quite a number
of the s3c24xx related patches from my various trees into the s3c24xx
custodian tree.
Merging the code in start.S is particularly cumbersome, since this file
has already exceeded any reasonable number of #ifdef/endif
This patch fixes bugs in usbdcore*.c related to the use of devices
with multiple configurations.
The original code made mistakes about the meaning of configuration value and
configuration index, and the resulting off-by-one errors resulted in:
* SET_CONFIGURATION always selected the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I meanwhile realized that the entire makefile system doesn't really cope
with the fact. So what I'm left with is something along the lines of
Please explain what's the problem...
the attached patch, where the cpu/arm920t/start.S #includes a
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I was wondering if u-boot would also accept the merge of a framebuffer
driver that doesn't allow runtime mode-setting.
What makes you think that would be a problem?
Even inside the Linux kernel e.g. the s3c2410 framebuffer is configured
by
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
From: Michal Simek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This change helps with better handling with others
Xilinx based platform.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
common/cmd_bdinfo.c |8
cpu/ppc4xx/speed.c |2 +-
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Acked-by: Stefan Roese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wolfgang, please apply this directly, since it doesn't fit into one
of the custodian repositories.
Done, but pulling this into the ppc4xx repo would have been fine with
me.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
vidinfo_t panel_info = {
640, 480, 212, 158, CFG_HIGH, CFG_HIGH, CFG_LOW, CFG_LOW, CFG_HIGH,
-3, 0, 0, 1, 1, 144, 2, 0, 33
+3, 0, 0, 1, 1, 88, 2, 0, 33
Indentation by TABs, please
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Is there any reason not to enable this unconditionally?
Don't really know. I've used config option just to provide old behavior.
I vote for adding this unconditionally, too.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Current fat.c have three 64KB static array, it makes
the BSS section larger.
Change the static to dynamic allocation.
So what's the benefit? BSS size doesn't matter - itr comes for free.
It get's initialized automatically.
You add more than 30 lines of
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I noticed that the device id for AMD flash part AM29DL800BB is wrong.
Attached patch corrects it.
...
-#define AM29DL800BB 0x22C8
+#define AM29DL800BB 0x22CB
H... I have but an old data sheet (Nov 2000) for this chip, which
indeed says 22CB.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jens Gehrlein wrote:
Could you please change TQM823L.h:
-#define CFG_FLASH_BANKS_LIST { CFG_FLASH_BASE }
+#define CFG_FLASH_BANKS_LIST { CFG_FLASH_BASE, CFG_FLASH_BASE +
0x40 }
Note that a proper patch (and without line wrapping) would have been
much
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
When enable CONFIG_DRIVER_SMC911X_16_BIT in smc911x, can not compile it.
I revised it from elif preprocessor to elif defined.
Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/net/smc911x.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+),
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Nobuhiro,
Nice catch! Thanks.
Wolfgang/Detlev,
Please pull directly.
Done.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
The compiler will help find mismatches between printf formats and
arguments if you let it. This patch adds the necessary attributes to
declarations in include/common.h, then corrects the resulting compiler
warnings in several files. Some of these were
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--070905020504060509080209
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
update mvBL-M7 config file to use UBOOT_VERSION and define
CONFIG_HIGH_BATS.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/net/smc911x.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
WD/Detlev,
please pull mostly MVBLM7 board fixes:
The following changes since commit 914f58c5766860373a7d232e961cee5a4b54a55b:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Merge branch 'master' of git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-cfi-flash
are available in the git
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Jens Gehrlein schrieb:
Who will pick up this patch series (if there are no complaints)? Peter?
Of course, we could put them into the TQ custodian tree.
Awkward, that I forgot this.
But it still has to go through the respective custodian.
Best
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Of course, we could put them into the TQ custodian tree.
Awkward, that I forgot this.
So I'm assuming I need take no u-boot-arm actions
But please do. It's ARM specific code, and needs to be reviewed and
confirmed by an independent ARM expert.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Makefile | 25 ++---
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 845b564..ac3f98f 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -2913,43 +2913,46 @@ atngw100_config : unconfig
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
When compiling ms7750se board with make O=some dir, I got some errors.
I tuned some makefiles.
Thanks for pointing this out; but you fix only one board, leaving all
the others that have the same problem unfixed. Other parts of your
patch were already
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Please pull
The following changes since commit a524e112b424c6843800ea2f19d3a8cf01d0aa94:
Detlev Zundel (1):
Merge branch 'master' of git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx
are available in the git repository at:
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
But even if that is the case, there still might be some build breakage.
I've found an error on ARM, I'll send a patch about it soon.
Sorry, and thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
J.
--
Shinya Kuribayashi
NEC Electronics
By Cleanup out-or-tree building for some boards (.depend)
(commit:c8a3b109f07f02342d097b30908965f7261d9f15)
because filse ware changed, some SH-boards have compile error.
I revised this problem.
Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
MAKEALL |2 +-
Hi Ben.
2008/7/6 Ben Warren [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
3645 06/11 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] net: sh: Renesas
SH7763 Ethernet device support
- for net custodian
Didn't pick this up because it was after what I thought was the cut-off of
6/10. It still has issues, so
51 matches
Mail list logo
