Hi,
Is their a reason why the AT91 Bootstrap code was never ported to
U-boot?
Thanks.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Mic
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 23:38 +0100, michael wrote:
> Ok
> E Robertson wrote:
> >> Can you send me your diff?
> >>
> >
> > The diff I'm using is attached.
> > Thanks.
> >
> I'm talking about your adding code. Don't use the mai
On 2/12/08, Ulf Samuelsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> > Once I start using sam7 util, the bootstrap code has not been executed
> >> > which means the SDRAM has not been initialized. I'll have to added the
> >> > lowlevel init to do that, which I might try if nothing else works.
> >> >
> >> >
Oops. It bounce back anyway.
On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok
> E Robertson wrote:
> >> Can you send me your diff?
> >>
> >
> > The diff I'm using is attached.
> > Thanks.
> >
> I'm talking about your adding co
On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> E Robertson wrote:
> > On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>>> Do you try to
> >>>> load with a jtag in memory and execute it?
> >>
On 2/12/08, Ulf Samuelsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> So, do you change the text base?
> >>
> >>
> >> >>> No I did not. I don't have a reason to. Why?
> >> >>>
> >> Is the new size compatible with the armboot? Do you skip LOW_LEVEL_INIT?
> >
> > Yes, it is sk
On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> >
> >> Do you try to
> >> load with a jtag in memory and execute it?
> >>
> >
> > I don't have a jtag fitted for this as yet. I'm using the sam7 util.
> >
> >
> Simple step:
> - flash the work system
> - loady
> put you version of u-boot and
On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> > Yes, it is skipped. From what I understood Bootstrap does the
> > necessary boot init tasks (althought I would rather put it in uboot).
> > Do I need to changs this?
> >
> >
> No,
>
> I will try to help you. Do you check the new size, format,
On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> E Robertson wrote:
> > On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>>> So, do you change the text base?
> >>>>
> >>>>
&
On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> >> So, do you change the text base?
> >>
> >
> > No I did not. I don't have a reason to. Why?
> >
> >
> Sorry I think that you talk about config.mk
> board//config.mk
>
> TEXT_BASE = 0x21f0
>
On the 9263 it is 0x23F0 and I believe I ch
On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> E Robertson wrote:
> > On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>> Hi All,
> >>> I made some changes to u-boot-1.1.5 atmel patch 1.5 and rebuild ubo
On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> > Hi All,
> > I made some changes to u-boot-1.1.5 atmel patch 1.5 and rebuild uboot.
> > However, after rebuilding it would not run uboot.
> > Has anyone had this problem before?
> >
> What type of changes?
Makefile and config.mk files for my
Hi All,
I made some changes to u-boot-1.1.5 atmel patch 1.5 and rebuild uboot.
However, after rebuilding it would not run uboot.
Has anyone had this problem before?
If I rewrite the dataflash with the pre-built uboot image, then it
boots so I guess I might be missing something. DataFlash is enabled
13 matches
Mail list logo
