Aggrwal,
The u-boot mail list is moved to u-b...@lists.denx.de,
Please post the patch to there.
Thanks,
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: Aggrwal Poonam-B10812
> Sent: 2008?12?30? 1:02 PM
> To: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net; Liu Dave-R63238
> Subject: [PATCH][u-boot
Yes, I also happened it as you.
Please revert it and have a try.
Revert "mpc85xx: Update linker scripts for Freescale boards"
This reverts commit f0ff885ca64655bee6540eb8a25eed90b1152686.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of
> diff --git a/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S b/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S
> index 309eb30..39bcaa8 100644
> --- a/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S
> +++ b/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S
> @@ -63,6 +63,9 @@
> * Use r14 to access the GOT
> */
> START_GOT
> +#if defined(CONFIG_NAND_SPL)
> + GOT_ENTRY(_GOT_TABLE_)
> +#else
>
---
cpu/mpc83xx/start.S | 310
---
1 files changed, 220 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S b/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S
index 309eb30..39bcaa8 100644
--- a/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S
+++ b/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S
@@ -63,6 +63,9 @@
* U
> This moves the MMC and SD Card command definitions from
> include/asm/arch/mmc.h into include/mmc.h. These definitions are given
> by the MMC and SD Card standards, not by any particular architecture.
>
> There's a lot more room for consolidation in the MMC drivers which I'm
> hoping to get d
>
> I'm running Ubuntu and am getting this errors too. Even without
> enabling CONFIG_FIT:
When I build MPC8360EMDS/MPC837XEMDS on Ubuntu, the same error
happen to me.
Thanks,
Dave
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Market
Dear Wolfgang,
I have to use the stupid webmail now, sorry for that.
Applied, but please provide new (incremental) patches to fix the
following remaining issues:
[dave] Thank you very much, I will do that.
drivers/block/ata_piix.h:
Please add a file header which contains appropriate
Your message is extremely difficult to read. Can you please use proper
quoting? Please read http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
if you need help...
[dave] sorry for that, I'm using the webmail to access my mailbox.
the webmail is stupid.
> [dave]the common/cmd_sata.c is more likely c
-Original Message-
From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 3/26/2008 7:58 AM
To: Liu Dave
Cc: u-boot-external; Phillips Kim
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/9] SATA framework and FSL SATA support patch set
Dear Dave,
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
&g
> Initial the MPC837x PCIE controller.
> Note that configue address bit field is not compatible with
> PCIE spec 10a.
> So, the pci command output is not reliable.
> Just map 16M pci configure space which corresponding to a bus
> configure space at once.
> If want to access bus number other than
> I can resubmit the additions to ata.h, and then maybe Dave
> could remove
> the corresponding parts from his patch?
Hello everybody,
I think it will be better to handle these duplicated mess.
after I sent the full patch.
Are you ok?
Thanks,
Dave
-
> > Hi Wolfgang,
> >
> > I don't know what version Dave intended here either; if he
> wants it in
> > 1.3.2 I'll apply and ask you to pull.
> >
> > Dave?
>
> Wolfgang, please apply the patch directly, for the 1.3.2 release
Hello Wolfgang and Kim, I'm mistaking to read Kim's message,
Actually,
> > > 1. Make the CSB bus pipeline depth as 4, and enable
> > >the repeat mode;
> > > 2. Raise the eTSEC emergency priority;
> > > 3. Use the highest IP blocks clock.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dave Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Is this supposed to go into the 1.3.2 release?
> >
> > Direct
Thanks Wolfgang
Best regards,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 1/23/2008 8:02 PM
To: Liu Dave
Cc: Phillips Kim; u-boot-external; Ben Warren
Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] Please pull u-boot-mpc83xx.git
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
> +#if defined(CONFIG_MPC834X) || \
> + defined(CONFIG_MPC8313) || \
> + defined(CONFIG_MPC8315) || \
> + defined(CONFIG_MPC837X)
> +
> +typedef struct spi8xxx
> +{
> + u8 res0[0x20]; /* 0x0-0x01f reserved */
> + u32 mode; /* mode register */
> + u32 event; /*
Ben,
Please take
1) RTL8211B PHY patch for 8315ERDB board
2) Extend UEC to 4 patch.
Into your tree.
I hope we can merge them into main tree.
Thanks,
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Joakim Tjernlund
> Sent: 2008?1?17? 5:2
Kim,
The patch also cause the MPC8315ERDB broken, the 8315ERDB
can not boot up.
The root cause is that the SATA clock is not correct.
I will send one patch to fix it.
Please merge it.
Thanks,
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Timur,
Could you also remove it in the MPC8315ERDB.h in 83xx tree?
Thanks,
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Tabi Timur
> Sent: 2008?1?16? 7:10 AM
> To: Phillips Kim; u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Tabi Timur
> Subj
> We have another source code repository (Synergy), and managing the
> source code with git is just not possible. I have posted many
> patches in
> the past using diff -purN, and there was never any problem.
Ok, maybe problem occur in my site.
If Kim or Ben can apply it successfully, please a
Kim,
Could you clean up the warning in 83xx current tree?
Thanks,
Dave
mpc8360emds.c: In function 'ft_board_setup':
mpc8360emds.c:327: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast
mpc8360emds.c:329: warning: passing argument 2 of 'fdt_getprop' makes integer
from pointer without
> Description: QE UEC: Add CMD_MII support, extend number of supported
> UECs to 4
David, I prefer to have two patch for this.
One is the CMD_MII support
The second is the extend UEC to 4.
> > diff -purN net/eth.c.orig net/eth.c
> --- net/eth.c.origWed Jan 2 13:39:04 2008
> +++ net/eth.c Thu
> I don't have access to 8313 or 8610 reference manuals. Can you please
> verify the memory map of these two for me. I've verified that 8315 is
> identical.
8313/8315/834x/8610 have same SPI.
Dave
-
Check out the new Sourc
> >
> > 8313/8315/834x/8610 have same SPI.
and 837x
> asm/immap_86xx.h doesn't have SPI registers listed in the
> memory map, so
> support for 8610 will have to wait.
>
> I've incorporated your change requests and will see if
> there's any more
> feedback on Monday before reposting the patch
> >> +typedef struct spi834x
> >> +{
> >> + u8 res0[0x20]; /* 0x0-0x01f reserved */
> >> + u32 mode; /* mode register */
> >> + u32 event; /* event register */
> >> + u32 mask; /* mask register */
> >> + u32 com;/* command register */
> >> +
> > clear the warning: unused variable 'p_buf'
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> > common/main.c |2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> applied 2 through 8 out of 8, since Kumar beat you to this p_buf patch
> (and is in common/ anyway, so
> I'd prefer if we didn't unnecessarily proliferate phy-specific status
> code. Does the generic mii_parse_sr() function not work for the
> RTL8211B? If so, this is fine. Otherwise, let's not have 10
> different versions of the same code, just because many PHYs have their
> own non-standard regi
> > I suggest keep the debug option - #undef DEBUG.
>
> DEBUG is not defined by default, so this statement is redundant at
> best, harmful in some cases (when you try to enable debug globally).
>
> > Sometimes, if we need debug, it is easy to open the debug mode
> > with the switch.
>
> But you
> I don't see how. The "#undef DEBUG" will override any
> #define DEBUG or -DDEBUG
> that you specify. The "#undef DEBUG" makes it impossible to
> use the debug()
> call or anything else like it.
Yes, the DEBUG is global, sometime it is my need.
-
28 matches
Mail list logo
