Scott Wood wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 06:10:10PM +0100, Rafal Jaworowski wrote:
>> Not really, unfortunatelly: the 85xx still lacks flushing the d-cache
>> before disabling it. I was going to fix this by refactoring existing
>> d-cache disabling/flushing routines into a common code that would
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 06:10:10PM +0100, Rafal Jaworowski wrote:
> Not really, unfortunatelly: the 85xx still lacks flushing the d-cache
> before disabling it. I was going to fix this by refactoring existing
> d-cache disabling/flushing routines into a common code that would sit in
> the lib_ppc/p
Kumar Gala wrote:
>> We are using MPC8555 processor and uboot 1.1.4 both the uboot and
>> linux
>> was up. Now we plan to port QNX, we are facing following issues.
>>
>> 1. Qnx is not jumping to the startup location. After giving go
>> command
>> control is still in the uboot only.
>>
>> 2. W
On Feb 26, 2008, at 11:30 AM, s.balamurugan wrote:
> Hi,
> We are using MPC8555 processor and uboot 1.1.4 both the uboot and
> linux
> was up. Now we plan to port QNX, we are facing following issues.
>
> 1. Qnx is not jumping to the startup location. After giving go
> command
> control is st
> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:00:17 +0530
> From: "s.balamurugan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Regarding Dcache Flush in MPC85xx
> To: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO
Hi,
We are using MPC8555 processor and uboot 1.1.4 both the uboot and linux
was up. Now we plan to port QNX, we are facing following issues.
1. Qnx is not jumping to the startup location. After giving go command
control is still in the uboot only.
2. When searching in the mailling list we cam
