Hi,
Im working on adding support for our board to u-boot.
I use legacy flash mode for our boot-flash. I however have some problems
with it.
When using jedec probe to identify our flash. Im unable to do so with our
16bit device-id. In my opinion it seems like this actually wont work(?)
cmdset_a
Hello,
the attached patch replaces the patch I sent before. I added myself to
the list of board maintainers and diffed against U-Boot git from this
morning, i.e. v1.3.2.
The attached patch adds support for the Renesas SH7720 based board MPR2.
Regards,
Mark Jonas
CHANGELOG:
--
sh: Added
Hi
This patch adds support for our new AVR32 based board.
diff -Nur old/u-boot-1.3.0/board/miromico/hammerhead/config.mk
new/u-boot-1.3.0/board/miromico/hammerhead/config.mk
--- old/u-boot-1.3.0/board/miromico/hammerhead/config.mk1970-01-01
01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ new/u-boot-1.3.0/board
Hi
I don't understand CONFIG_CMD_NET and CONFIG_NET_MULTI.
I would expect CONFIG_CMD_NET to be defined whenever I want to have
network support in U-Boot, right?
And CONFIG_NET_MULTI is defined when I have more then one network interface?
I try to adapt U-Boot to our new AVR32 based board. AVR32
Hi
I don't understand CONFIG_CMD_NET and CONFIG_NET_MULTI.
I would expect CONFIG_CMD_NET to be defined whenever I want to have
network support in U-Boot, right?
And CONFIG_NET_MULTI is defined when I have more then one network interface?
I try to adapt U-Boot to our new AVR32 based board. AVR32
On Monday 10 March 2008, Alex wrote:
> This patch adds support for our new AVR32 based board.
Your patch is line wrapped. Please fix this and resubmit.
One quick comment without looking too deep into your patch:
You are introducing a board specific flash driver. This should not be
necessary an
Hello,
the attached patch replaces the patch I sent before. I came to the the
conclusion that making SMSC's driver comply to the U-Boot coding style
would be the right thing because SMSC will most likely not update
their driver very often. I hope the driver is now compliant enough. It
was really a
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 6:37 AM, Alex Raimondi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I don't understand CONFIG_CMD_NET and CONFIG_NET_MULTI.
>
It's confusing, true.
> I would expect CONFIG_CMD_NET to be defined whenever I want to have
> network support in U-Boot, right?
>
> And CONFIG_NET_MULTI
Hi
> On Monday 10 March 2008, Alex wrote:
>
>> This patch adds support for our new AVR32 based board.
>>
>
> Your patch is line wrapped. Please fix this and resubmit.
> One quick comment without looking too deep into your patch:
>
> You are introducing a board specific flash driver. This s
On Monday 10 March 2008, Alex Raimondi wrote:
> >> This patch adds support for our new AVR32 based board.
> >
> > Your patch is line wrapped. Please fix this and resubmit.
> > One quick comment without looking too deep into your patch:
> >
> > You are introducing a board specific flash driver. Thi
>
> It is again. I suggest that you first send this message to yourself, until
> you
> figured out how to do it correctly. And if you are working with git, I
> strongly encourage you to use git-send-email to send patches.
Now tested as you suggested:
diff -Nur old/u-boot-1.3.0/board/miromico/
Dear Andy,
I experience the same behavior as ksi described.
I experience this over u-boot-1.3.2-rc3 which should have had this fixed.
I assume you referred to commit 21fae8b2b4e4e6e648796e07e20ab13e9cb18923.
Are there any follow ups on this subject?
Liberty
this is a flash 2 flash example. It
Hi Mark,
Mark Jonas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the attached patch replaces the patch I sent before. I came to the the
> conclusion that making SMSC's driver comply to the U-Boot coding style
> would be the right thing because SMSC will most likely not update
> their driver very often. I hope the driver i
On Sat, 08 Mar 2008 10:19:56 +0100
Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Kim,
>
> in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >
> > > I don't think it's exactly intuitive to have a board named
> > > "mpc832xemds" and the related files use "mpc832x_mds".
> > >
> > > That look
On Mar 10, 2008, at 7:35 AM, Eran Liberty wrote:
> Dear Andy,
>
> I experience the same behavior as ksi described.
>
> I experience this over u-boot-1.3.2-rc3 which should have had this
> fixed.
> I assume you referred to commit
> 21fae8b2b4e4e6e648796e07e20ab13e9cb18923.
>
> Are there
On Mar 9, 2008, at 12:07 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> U-Boot v1.3.2 has been released and is available from the git
> repository and the FTP server.
>
>
> The Merge Window for v1.3.3 is open until Mar 31, 23:59:59 MET.
>
> Release v1.3.3 is scheduled for May 12, but you know that
Hi Alex,
Alex wrote:
>> It is again. I suggest that you first send this message to yourself, until
>> you
>> figured out how to do it correctly. And if you are working with git, I
>> strongly encourage you to use git-send-email to send patches.
>>
>
> Now tested as you suggested:
>
>
> dif
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>>> I don't think this is a good idea. File names and board config names
>>> should match as far as possible, and here is no good reason to
>>> deviate from this rule.
>> But the DTS files have already been renamed. The DTS f
Kumar Gala kernel.crashing.org> writes:
>
>
> On Mar 10, 2008, at 7:35 AM, Eran Liberty wrote:
>
> > Dear Andy,
> >
> > I experience the same behavior as ksi described.
> >
> > I experience this over u-boot-1.3.2-rc3 which should have had this
> > fixed.
> > I assume you referred to commit
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> Now tested as you suggested:
Hmm...
...
> +#define CFG_LOAD_ADDR(CFG_SDRAM_BASE + 0x0040)
> +#define CFG_BOOTPARAMS_LEN (16 * 1024)
> +
> +/* Other configuration settings that shouldn't have to change all that
>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> What's the plan for the new-image branch for 1.3.3?
It will be merged.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Top lines changed by employer
> Gentoo61912 (31.8%)
> Freescale 40796 (21.0%)
How do you determine these numbers? By email address?
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
- insert partition for dtb blob to TQM5200B MTD layout
- set env variables dependent on the configured board
(TQM5200 or TQM5200B)
Signed-off-by: Martin Krause <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/configs/TQM5200.h | 21 -
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
di
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 7:35 AM, Eran Liberty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Andy,
>
> I experience the same behavior as ksi described.
Sadly, you are experiencing a slightly different behavior.
>
> => cp.b FF80 FF00 8
> Copy to Flash... External Interrupt Exception at PC: 1ffc
Here is my sequence narrated:
U-Boot 1.3.2-rc3 (Mar 6 2008 - 12:00:30)
CPU: 8548, Version: 2.0, (0x80310020)
Core: E500, Version: 2.0, (0x80210020)
Clock Configuration:
CPU: 990 MHz, CCB: 396 MHz,
DDR: 198 MHz, LBC: 49 MHz
L1:D-cache 32 kB enabled
I-cache 32 kB en
Wolfgang,
I sent a patch last week that moved 3 FSL boards
from board/ so that they would instead be under
board/freescale/.
As that patch is for a 7448, 826x and 8266 families,
I didn't apply it to my mpc86xx repository. Would you
be willing to apply that patch directly when you get
a chance?
Receive FIFO level register is different in SH4A.
Because register is different, cannot occasionally receive data.
Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/serial/serial_sh.c | 52 +--
1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 22 deletion
On Monday 10 March 2008, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Top lines changed by employer
> > Gentoo61912 (31.8%)
> > Freescale 40796 (21.0%)
>
> How do you determine these numbers? By email address?
why you gotta hate the Gentoo ! :)
i dont know if
On Mar 10, 2008, at 11:26 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 10 March 2008, Timur Tabi wrote:
>> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> Top lines changed by employer
>>> Gentoo61912 (31.8%)
>>> Freescale 40796 (21.0%)
>>
>> How do you determine these numbers? By email ad
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > How do you determine these numbers? By email address?
>
> why you gotta hate the Gentoo ! :)
I don't hate it. ?
> i dont know if the script has a small db, but ADI employs me (obviously)
It may be obvious to you, it ain't so for me.
This changes
30 matches
Mail list logo
