In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> The cpu-release-addr is defined as always being a 64-bit quanity regardless
> if we are running on a 32-bit or 64-bit machine.
> ---
> cpu/mpc85xx/fdt.c |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Signed-off-by line missing...
Best r
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Use symbolic names instead of hard coded addresses for Litekit membases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Lilja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Applied, thanks.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 16
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> This patch enables SPI and MC13783/RTC support for the Litekit board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Lilja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> board/imx31_litekit/imx31_litekit.c | 12
> include/configs/imx31_litekit.h |8
> 2 file
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Correct the Linux architecture number for i.MX31 Litekit and ADS boards.
>
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Lilja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> board/imx31_litekit/imx31_litekit.c |2 +-
> board/mx31ads/mx31ads.c |2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> in commit fad634071 "make show_boot_progress () weak."
> show_boot_progress is supposed to be declared as weak but declare as inline
> instead of.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> diff --git a/include/common.h
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Vlad Lungu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> drivers/pcnet.c |3 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zunde
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > this patch is still on my "open" list. Can you please review and
> > apply if it makes sense to you? Thanks.
>
> I don't have access to my build machine right now, and this looks
> harmless. Please pull directly.
Done, thanks.
Best regards,
Wo
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > this patch is still on my "open" list. Can you please review and
> > apply if it makes sense to you? Thanks.
>
> This looks OK to me. Assuming that pci_io_to_phys() is defined on all
> relevant architectures, I have no objections. Unfortunately
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Bus and phys address are not always the same
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlad Lungu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> drivers/pcnet.c |1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engine
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > Please add the sof of the first author of the patch from who you
> > deriverd.
>
> Sorry for that. Patch revised.
>
> >
>
> [MIPS] qemu-mips.h: Cleanup whiespaces, tab indentat
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Implement watchodg-aware variants of hash calculation functions:
> - crc32_wd()
> - md5_wd()
> - sha1_csum_wd()
> The above functions calculate the hash of the input buffer in chunks,
> triggering the watchdog after processing each chunk. The chunk size i
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> Fix coding style in drivers/net/ax88796.h too
>
> drivers/net/ax88796.h | 46 ++--
> drivers/net/ne2000.c | 276 --
> drivers/net/ne2000.h |
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> CONFIG_ENV_OVERWRITE is also added.
>
> This patch is originally created by Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signe
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Sieka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> common/image.c | 43 +--
> include/image.h | 17 +++--
> lib_generic/crc32.c |1 +
> lib_generic/md5.c |4
> li
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> This is for 1.3.3 release. Please review.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Shinya
>
> >
> Signed-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> doc/README.mips | 58
> +
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Apologies for the previous patch, forgot to add the new files to it. No
> wonder it seemed so short.
> Here it is again
Signed-off-by line missing.
MAINTAINERS entry missing.
Patch corrupted because your mailer line-wrapped it.
Best regards,
Wolfga
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> This reverts commit 70431e8a7393b6b793f77957f95b999fc9a269b8 which has
> proven problematic getting right from the start at least on 83xx and
> 4xx.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> cpu/mpc83xx/start.S | 11 ---
> li
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> The following changes since commit 58c5376ba67767ee684069d43e7f747a5d9ae8ed:
> Wolfgang Denk (1):
> Merge branch 'master' of git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.denx.de/u-boot-at91
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> From: Roy Zang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This patch removes the unknown flash message information:
> '## Unknown FLASH on Bank 1 - Size = 0xdeadbeef = -286261248 MB'
> This unknown flash message is caused by PromJet.
> Some of the board user is unhappy wit
Dear All,
Can I use u-boot boot loader on mpc852 (powerPC)?
I mean is already some patch is available ? ? ?
Please acknowledge, thank you ...
Kind Regards,
Vijay
Email Disclaimer:
---
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the
intende
Hi All,
I am writing XPS_LL_TEMAC for Xilinx PowerPC.
Can anyone give me an advice on which I should correct this source?
Thanks in advance,
Yoshio Kashiwagi - Nissin Systems
/*
*
* xilinx_ll_temac.c ethernet driver for u-boot
*
* Author: Yoshio Kashiwagi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Copyright (
Hi,
confirm that the problem is in fat.c file and I will try to fix.
Michael
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use
Hash calculation of an image can be a time consuming operation, with the
possibility of making the hardware watchdog (if present/enabled) expire in the
middle. Make image hash calculation use use watchdog-aware functions.
---
v3 of the patchset, rebased against current TOT (commit 04a5b03d), droppe
Propagate change introduced by "crc32: use uint32_t rather than unsigned
long", commit id 89cdab788f3716b335fefb60b836ebcf975aceab. While there,
change uint to uInt in crc32_wd prototype, to match convention already
present in the file.
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Sieka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
lib
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Sieka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
common/image.c | 42 --
include/image.h | 17 +++--
lib_generic/crc32.c |1 +
lib_generic/md5.c |4
lib_generic/sha1.c |4
5 files changed, 32 insertio
On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 03:10 +0800, Phillips Kim wrote:
> this seems as a good compromise between human memory, typing,
> and last but not least, to accommodate for current and future kernel
> bloat.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Dave Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
> > Current flush_cache code does
> >
> > 1. clean the dcache with dcbst, but not invalidate dcache
> > 2. invalidate icache
> >
> > This patch use the dcbf instead of dcbst to have stronger
> > semantic, clean the dcache and invalidate dcache.
>
> On which processors did you test the changes? I h
Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/esd/apc405/apc405.c |7 ++-
include/configs/APC405.h | 14 --
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/esd/apc405/apc405.c b/board/esd/apc405/apc405.c
index b663184..2cb743e 100644
--- a
Hi,
Thank you for your reply.
> Are you aware that U-Boot has scripting capabilities, to the extend of
> being able to run shell scripts?
What I was thinking as "boomf" is like a patch bellow (It is for U-Boot 1.1.4
and just a prototype). I knew about scripting, but I thought it was difficult
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> Can I use u-boot boot loader on mpc852 (powerPC)?
Yes, of course you can. MPC8xx is well supported.
> I mean is already some patch is available ? ? ?
Patch? Patch for what?
You will probably have to port U-Boot to your custome hardware,
though.
Be
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
lib_generic/crc32.c |9 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib_generic/crc32.c b/lib_generic/crc32.c
index 58cd22e..32e72f9 100644
--- a/lib_generic/crc32.c
+++ b/lib_generic/crc32.c
@@ -151,10 +151,7 @@
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Markus Klotzbuecher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
cpu/arm920t/s3c24x0/usb_ohci.c |4 ++--
cpu/mpc5xxx/usb_ohci.c |4 ++--
cpu/ppc4xx/usb_ohci.c |4 ++--
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
lib_generic/crc32.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib_generic/crc32.c b/lib_generic/crc32.c
index 32e72f9..73070de 100644
--- a/lib_generic/crc32.c
+++ b/lib_generic/crc32.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#else
#i
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > On which processors did you test the changes? I have some unclear
> > memories of dcbf having problems on for example MPC8xx ?
>
> on 83xx parts.
> I remember the 601 processor not support the dcbf.
OK, so cannot use the patch you suggested.
> > >
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Sieka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> common/image.c | 42 --
> include/image.h | 17 +++--
> lib_generic/crc32.c |1 +
> lib_generic/md5.c |4
> lib
Hi Magnus, Ben,
Magnus Lilja schrieb:
> Hi Ben,
>
>> > Well, the i.MX31 Litekit board has a 16-bit LAN9117 and that seems to
>> > work with the 32-bit flag set in the config file.
>> >
>> That's good news. I would prefer, though, to break this into two
>> 16-bit accesses so we don't need
On Friday 25 April 2008, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Applied to u-boot-ppc4xx. Thanks.
Best regards,
Stefan
=
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HR
The following changes since commit 58c5376ba67767ee684069d43e7f747a5d9ae8ed:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Merge branch 'master' of git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx.git master
Matthias Fuchs (1):
ppc4xx: Add bo
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 08:27:20 +0200
Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +#define CONFIG_IPADDR 192.168.1.67
> > +#define CONFIG_SERVERIP192.168.1.50
> > +#define CONFIG_GATEWAYIP 192.168.1.1
> > +#define CONFIG_NETMASK 255.255.255.0
> > +#define CONFIG
On Friday 25 April 2008, Ayman El-Khashab wrote:
> > Sounds quite reasonable. The only thing I'm unsure here is the size of
> > the PCI windows that is mapped upon PCI booting.
>
> Thanks for all your help ...
>
> I thought the answer to both questions was in footnote 3 on page 8 of
> the data shee
On Apr 25, 2008, at 3:39 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> From: Roy Zang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> This patch removes the unknown flash message information:
>> '## Unknown FLASH on Bank 1 - Size = 0xdeadbeef = -286261248 MB'
>> This unknown flash message is c
On Apr 25, 2008, at 2:16 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> you wrote:
>> The cpu-release-addr is defined as always being a 64-bit quanity
>> regardless
>> if we are running on a 32-bit or 64-bit machine.
>> ---
>> cpu/mpc85xx/fdt.c |2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 inse
Stefan Roese wrote:
> On Thursday 24 April 2008, Ayman M. El-Khashab wrote:
>
>> So maybe I need to clarify some more. The PPC460 data sheet
>> is not too clear on this yet. However, here are my thoughts
>> on this. Lets just take the simple case as an example. We
>> have a plurality of 460s
>> We discussed this a bit on IRC; Kumar suggested to go for 1., and I
>> agree.
>
> Where is the IRC? Could you point it to me?
same server (irc.freenode.net) as #mklinux, but the channel is #u-boot
- k
-
This SF.net email
On Apr 25, 2008, at 6:15 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>>
>>> On which processors did you test the changes? I have some unclear
>>> memories of dcbf having problems on for example MPC8xx ?
>>
>> on 83xx parts.
>> I remember the 601 processor not support the d
On Monday 21 April 2008, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> let me summarize: let's take my initial patch that I posted on Friday.
> At least two people will be satisfied :-)
OK.
I applied the first version to the u-boot-cfi-flash repository.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Stefan
=
The following changes since commit d0d91ae3acb4f29d1a2a3a766747478ed54e2848:
Stefan Roese (1):
ppc4xx: Remove double defines in lwmon5.h
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-cfi-flash.git master
Matthias Fuchs (1):
cfi-flash: Add CFG_FLASH_AUTOPR
for some minor fixes:
The following changes since commit d0d91ae3acb4f29d1a2a3a766747478ed54e2848:
Stefan Roese (1):
ppc4xx: Remove double defines in lwmon5.h
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-mpc83xx.git
Dave Liu (2):
mpc83xx: remove the unu
Michael Trimarchi wrote:
> confirm that the problem is in fat.c file and I will try to fix.
It has been confirmed that fatls does _not_ list
all files on FAT32 filesystems.
There are _no_ reports of fatls failing to list
all files on FAT16 filesystems. (There may be
an unrelated bug caused by a
Hi,
Although I included cache control in this source at the post at this
ML, I found the bug in cache control. I'll correct those bugs.
# However, this code is also checking normal operation by EDK10.1 design.
Best Regards,
Yoshio Kashiwagi - Nissin Systems
> Hi All,
>
> I am writing XPS_LL_TE
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 02:45:38PM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
>
> Good luck with this PCI booting stuff. Please keep us informed on the
> progress.
>
We'll contribute back what we find on this approach. We won't be able
to try it until aug/sep since that is when the assembled boards will be
i
Hi Gary,
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 08:27:20 +0200
> Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > +#define CONFIG_IPADDR 192.168.1.67
>> > +#define CONFIG_SERVERIP 192.168.1.50
>> > +#define CONFIG_GATEWAYIP 192.168.1.1
>> > +#define CONFIG_NETMASK255.255.255.0
>> >
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > This patch enables SPI and MC13783/RTC support for the Litekit board.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Magnus Lilja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> >
> > board/imx31_litekit/imx31_li
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Michael Trimarchi wrote:
>
>
>> confirm that the problem is in fat.c file and I will try to fix.
>>
>
> It has been confirmed that fatls does _not_ list
> all files on FAT32 filesystems.
>
> There are _no_ reports of fatls failing to list
> all files on FAT16
Hi,
when do you have spare time can you give some feedback about arm ide patch?
Regards Michael
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time
Hi
I wanted to get Stefan's git and got the following error:
> $ git clone http://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx.git/ work
<...>
> Getting pack list for http://www.denx.de/u-boot.git/
> error: Unable to find f616ab96cc773d1719761d511a8649c9aa6eb473 under
> http://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx.git
Handle Stefan's comments. This has the added benefit of making the
patch considerably smaller.
Signed-off-by: Gary Jennejohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
MAINTAINERS |4 +
MAKEALL |1 +
Makefile|3 +
board/quad100hd/Makefile|
Hi Stefan,
>> There does not appear to be a 460EX User's Manual on
>> the AMCC web site. Anyone know where to get it?
>> I created an account just in case it was not visible
>> to guests, but no change.
>
> It's still preliminary, so you probably need to contact
> your AMCC distributor/FAE to get
New and improved, herbal forumlas guaranteed to work or your money back
http://www.laaleu.com/
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to
Hi Niklaus,
> Hi
>
> I wanted to get Stefan's git and got the following error:
>> $ git clone http://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx.git/ work
> <...>
>> Getting pack list for http://www.denx.de/u-boot.git/
>> error: Unable to find f616ab96cc773d1719761d511a8649c9aa6eb473 under
>> http://www.denx.d
Wolfgang Denk denx.de> writes:
>
> In message
applera.com> you wrote:
>
> Also note that a cramfs may fail to work in case there are bad
> sectors in your NAND device.
>
Wolfgang, this might be an off topic here. I have a client requirement to have
a RFS like cramfs or squashfs on
It looks like fat.c is not handling the case where the
sectors/cluster is 1, and the rood directory spans multiple clusters.
In my case I was getting garbage directoy info after the invalid
fat error. The attached patch stops the code from rolling past the end of
cluster.
It looks like
Michael Trimarchi wrote:
> In my spare time a try to change the do_fat_read to support
> the chaining.
Thank you. Please let me know of anything I can do to help.
Does this mean you are now able to duplicate the problem?
The "Microsoft Extensible Firmware Initiative FAT32 File System
Specific
On Apr 25, 2008, at 7:52 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Apr 25, 2008, at 3:39 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> In message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>>> From: Roy Zang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>> This patch removes the unknown flash message information:
>>> '## Unknown FLASH on Bank 1 - Size = 0xdea
Adrian Filipi wrote:
> It looks like fat.c is not handling the case where the
> sectors/cluster is 1, and the rood directory spans multiple clusters.
>
> In my case I was getting garbage directory info after
> the invalid fat error. The attached patch stops the code
> from rolling
Russell McGuire wrote:
> All,
>
> Just curious if anyone has done any work with this near past.
> I have had an 8360E board up for several months now and been happily working
> away with different types of Kingston S0-DIMM DDR2 memory.
>
> 512MB, 1204MB, DDR2 533Mhz memory. All work well, with U-
Hello Gary,
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > > +#define CONFIG_IPADDR192.168.1.67
> > > +#define CONFIG_SERVERIP 192.168.1.50
> > > +#define CONFIG_GATEWAYIP 192.168.1.1
> > > +#define CONFIG_NETMASK 255.255.255.0
> > > +#define CONFIG_ETHADDR
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > Signed-off-by line missing...
>
> oops (should have had it). This got into the tree how do you want to
> deal with it?
Oops. Well, that cannot be changed. Maybe you can post the S-o-b ,
just for the record :-)
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Dear Michael,
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> when do you have spare time can you give some feedback about arm ide patch?
Note: you addressed this question to the Mailing List, not to any
specific person.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD
The cpu-release-addr is defined as always being a 64-bit quanity regardless
if we are running on a 32-bit or 64-bit machine.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
posted with S-o-b just so we have a record.
- k
A
cpu/mpc85xx/fdt.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 delet
On Apr 25, 2008, at 4:48 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>>
>>> Signed-off-by line missing...
>>
>> oops (should have had it). This got into the tree how do you want to
>> deal with it?
>
> Oops. Well, that cannot be changed. Maybe you can post the S-o-b ,
>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> The following changes since commit 58c5376ba67767ee684069d43e7f747a5d9ae8ed:
> Wolfgang Denk (1):
> Merge branch 'master' of git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> The following changes since commit d0d91ae3acb4f29d1a2a3a766747478ed54e2848:
> Stefan Roese (1):
> ppc4xx: Remove double defines in lwmon5.h
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-cfi-flash.git master
>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> for some minor fixes:
>
> The following changes since commit d0d91ae3acb4f29d1a2a3a766747478ed54e2848:
> Stefan Roese (1):
> ppc4xx: Remove double defines in lwmon5.h
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://www.denx.de/git/u-b
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> From: Roy Zang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This patch removes the unknown flash message information:
> '## Unknown FLASH on Bank 1 - Size = 0xdeadbeef = -286261248 MB'
> This unknown flash message is caused by PromJet.
> Some of the board user is unhappy wit
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> From: Ed Swarthout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Signed-off-by: Ed Swarthout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> board/freescale/mpc8544ds/mpc8544ds.c |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Appli
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> This patch enables SPI and MC13783/RTC support for the Litekit board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Lilja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> board/imx31_litekit/imx31_litekit.c | 12
> include/configs/imx31_litekit.h |8
> 2 file
Hello,
I decided to tag the current versionof U-Boot as "rc1".
At the moment, I have the following patches still maked as open on my
list:
7972 04/03 Guennadi Liakhove [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] minor cs8900 driver
clean up
7997 04/03 Guennadi Liakhove [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] net: make ARP
Stefan Roese wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 April 2008, Dave Littell wrote:
>> >From …/board/amcc/sequoia/init.S:
>>
>> /* TLB-entry for Internal Registers & OCM */
>> tlbentry( 0xe000, SZ_16M, 0xe000, 0, AC_R|AC_W|AC_X|SA_I )
>>
>> Why is this memory region not marked Guarded? It would seem to
Hi Wolfgang,
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I decided to tag the current versionof U-Boot as "rc1".
>
> At the moment, I have the following patches still maked as open on my
> list:
>
> 7972 04/03 Guennadi Liakhove [U-Boot-Users] [PATC
Hi,
I corrected some faults and checked normal operation by EDK10.1.
Best Regards,
Yoshio Kashiwagi - Nissin Systems
diff --git a/drivers/net/Makefile b/drivers/net/Makefile
index d5e413b..a11238b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/net/Makefile
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ COBJS-y += uli526x.
Hi Gary,
On Friday 25 April 2008, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> Handle Stefan's comments. This has the added benefit of making the
> patch considerably smaller.
Looks much better now. Just some minor issues (nitpicking) left. See comments
below.
> diff --git a/board/quad100hd/quad100hd.c b/board/qua
82 matches
Mail list logo
