In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> So, I think that's all are board dependent what and where are easier
> and/or faster to implement.
I can understand this position to some extend from your local,
project-specific point of view. But in general, and especially from
the point of
Hello,
I found out, why the Generic MACB MII driver for the AT91SAM9260 doesn´t
work.
The problem is inside the file
/board/atmel/at91sam9260ek/at91sam9260ek.c
at91_set_B_periph(AT91_PIN_PA23, 0); //ETX2
at91_set_B_periph(AT91_PIN_PA24, 0); //ETX3
These lines are multiplexed with the TWI
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
>> So, I think that's all are board dependent what and where are easier
>> and/or faster to implement.
>>
>
> I can understand this position to some extend from your local,
> project-specific point of view. But in
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> I found out, why the Generic MACB MII driver for the AT91SAM9260 doesn´t
> work.
...
> Instead of lines PA23 and PA24 you have to use
>
> at91_set_B_periph(AT91_PIN_PA10, 0); //ETX2
> at91_set_B_periph(AT91_PIN_PA11, 0); //ETX3
>
> which have the
Add support for updating mac-address and local-mac-address in fdt for
all MPC8260 targets.
Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
cpu/mpc8260/cpu.c |5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpu/mpc8260/cpu.c b/cpu/mpc8260/cpu.c
index 414759e..4d5
各位老总：您们好！
诚祝：您们在2008年里；有鼠不尽的快乐！鼠不尽的收获！鼠不尽的钞票！
鼠不尽的幸福！鼠不尽的美满生活！愿： 您们阖家欢乐！幸福安康！
我公司可以长期提供：出口报关单，核销单，等等一系列手续；代理：出口
报关，商检，境内外运输..等等；还可以代办：出口欧盟许可证，欧盟产地证；
并且还有（广州国际贸易交易会）的摊位可以转让；价格特别优惠；有意者请来邮件
或来电联系。谢谢合作！
电话：0755-81153047。
Andrejs Cainikovs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Our boards flash driver is the same as in board/atmel/at91rm9200dk/flash.c
> The only thing that was modified is the flash identification routine, as
> there was no support for AT49BV642D.
This chip is supported by the CFI driver (the ATNGW100 board
Hi Sascha,
This series of patches introduce I2C support in U-Boot v2. This support is
similar to the one in 2.6.26 rc5 kernel. i2ctools diagnostics introduced is
based on http://www.lm-sensors.org/wiki/I2CTools
The benefit is that we can backport drivers present in linux kernel to u-boot
v2 wi
Syncing up mod_device_tables and filealias.c from 2.6.26 rc5 kernel.
introduce the mod_devicetable and sync the filealias from linux kernel
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/linux/mod_devicetable.h | 382
scripts/mod/file2ali
Add linux-like bitops definitions - this is based on 2.6.25 rc5 kernel
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/arm/lib/Makefile|1
arch/arm/lib/findbit.S | 181 +++
include/asm-arm/bitops.h | 86 +-
3
Introduce ID table translation library from Linux kernel
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/linux/idr.h | 128 +++
lib/Makefile|1
lib/idr.c | 836
3 files changed, 965 insertions(+)
Ind
First part of this patch introduces i2c-core and i2c-dev interface.
The codebase is sourced from 2.6.26 rc5 kernel
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/Kconfig |1
drivers/Makefile|1
drivers/i2c/Kconfig | 70 ++
drivers/i2c/Mak
I2c Algos are broken at the moment, but they are introduced for hope of keeping
the infrastructure alive and be fixed as the need arises.
The codebase is sourced from 2.6.26 rc5 kernel. This is useful for certain
platforms
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/i2c/Kconf
Introduce I2c commands from i2c-tools. This allows for app compatibility
This code is based on http://www.lm-sensors.org/wiki/I2CTools
and closely follows the functionality, options and man page documentation
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Documentation/commands.dox |
Introduce the i2c adapter for OMAP i2c controller. This is mostly a port from
2.6.26 rc5 kernel at:
http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-2.6.git;a=summary
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig |7
drivers/i2c/busses/
Introduce cpu_is_ macros similar to the one in 2.6.26 rc5 kernel, this
allows
for compile time optimization of CPU specific code in common drivers
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/asm-arm/arch-omap/silicon.h | 28
1 file changed, 2
Enable the i2c bus 1 if the adapter is enabled in defconfig.
This patch also fixes a sparse warning of sdram dev not being static
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/omap/board-sdp343x.c | 26 +-
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Please, someone, block this spammer.
Translation: Chinese ? English
Members chiefs: you!
Cheng Chu: you, in 2008; mice not have the joy! Not the harvest mouse!
Rats not money!
Rat endless happiness! The mice not happy life! To: your family fun!
Happiness and good health!
My company can provide
I'm afraid I can't tell you this because of
your confidentiality disclaimer below.. But what the heck...
Amit Kumar wrote:
Hello Guys,
I
have one clarification related to PXA255 code in U-boot.
If in board/pxa255_idp/config.mk
TEXT_BASE = 0xa308
The L2 size detection code was a bit confusing and we kept having to add
code to it to handle new processors. Change the sense of detection so we
look for the older processors that aren't changing.
Also added support for 1M cache size on 8572.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
c
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/freescale/mpc8544ds/mpc8544ds.c |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/freescale/mpc8544ds/mpc8544ds.c
b/board/freescale/mpc8544ds/mpc8544ds.c
index f615b23..1994e77 100644
--- a/board/freescale/m
Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
Andrejs Cainikovs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Our boards flash driver is the same as in board/atmel/at91rm9200dk/flash.c
The only thing that was modified is the flash identification routine, as
there was no support for AT49BV642D.
This chip is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ARM: This patch adds support for the Lyrtech SFF-SDR
> board, based on the TI DaVinci architecture (ARM926EJS).
I haven´t heard from anyone about my patch being accepted or not. It´s been
almost five weeks since I submitted the first version, and I still cannot see
it
Hi all,
The flash chip in my board is Intel 28F256P33T
which is not defined in the u-boot-1.1.6/include/flash.h
Please guide what is the procedure i should follow to add it.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Andrejs Cainikovs <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
>
> Andrej
Menon, Nishanth wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
>
> This series of patches introduce I2C support in U-Boot v2. This support is
> similar to the one in 2.6.26 rc5 kernel. i2ctools diagnostics introduced is
> based on http://www.lm-sensors.org/wiki/I2CTools
>
> The benefit is that we can backport drivers pre
Hi all,
I work with a linux cross-compiler (codesourcery with gcc 4.2.3) for
embedded powerpc targets (mpc8248).
So I tried to compile u-boot (version 1.1.6). It works fine with another and
older version of gcc (3.3.2) but with the new cross-compiler (4.2.3) I have
trouble to do this part :
powerp
valerian NA wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I work with a linux cross-compiler (codesourcery with gcc 4.2.3) for
> embedded powerpc targets (mpc8248).
> So I tried to compile u-boot (version 1.1.6). It works fine with another
> and older version of gcc (3.3.2) but with the new cross-compiler (4.2.3)
> I h
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:15:58AM -0500, Menon, Nishanth wrote:
> Timur,
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Timur Tabi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 9:55 AM
> > To: Menon, Nishanth
> > Cc: Sascha Hauer; Laurent Desnogues; Kamat, Nishant; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> >
Timur,
> -Original Message-
> From: Timur Tabi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 9:55 AM
> To: Menon, Nishanth
> Cc: Sascha Hauer; Laurent Desnogues; Kamat, Nishant; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> u-boot-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [Patch 0/9] U-boot-V
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 07:34:05AM -0500, Menon, Nishanth wrote:
> Add linux-like bitops definitions - this is based on 2.6.25 rc5 kernel
I haven't looked at it, but I guess you need these for the following
patches. It would be better to first introduce generic bitops. Otherwise
we end up with i2c
Sascha,
> -Original Message-
> From: Sascha Hauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 10:28 AM
> To: Menon, Nishanth
> Cc: Timur Tabi; Laurent Desnogues; Kamat, Nishant; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; u-boot-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [Patch 0/9] U-boot-V2
Menon, Nishanth wrote:
> Please see U-boot v2 here:
Sorry, I didn't notice that your patch is for U-Boot V2.
> It does not have i2c support. And IMHO, using kernel like i2c addition in
> U-Boot v2 is appropriate. Why this is not a bloat U-Boot v2?
If it isn't, then it means that U-Boot V2 wil
Sascha,
> -Original Message-
> From: Sascha Hauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 10:34 AM
> To: Menon, Nishanth
> Cc: Kamat, Nishant; u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net; Laurent Desnogues;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Patch 9/9] U-boo
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:41:44AM -0500, Menon, Nishanth wrote:
> Sascha,
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sascha Hauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 10:31 AM
> > To: Menon, Nishanth
> > Cc: Kamat, Nishant; u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net; Laurent Desnogue
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 07:36:20AM -0500, Menon, Nishanth wrote:
> Enable the i2c bus 1 if the adapter is enabled in defconfig.
How does the bus find its devices? Are they probed? Experience showed
that probing i2c devices is not safe, so this should be explicitly
allowed on board level.
Sascha
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:39:30AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Menon, Nishanth wrote:
>
> > Please see U-boot v2 here:
>
> Sorry, I didn't notice that your patch is for U-Boot V2.
>
> > It does not have i2c support. And IMHO, using kernel like i2c addition in
> > U-Boot v2 is appropriate. Why t
Timur,
> -Original Message-
> From: Timur Tabi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 10:40 AM
> To: Menon, Nishanth
> Cc: Sascha Hauer; Laurent Desnogues; Kamat, Nishant; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> u-boot-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [Patch 0/9] U-boot-
Sascha,
> -Original Message-
> From: Sascha Hauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 10:31 AM
> To: Menon, Nishanth
> Cc: Kamat, Nishant; u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net; Laurent Desnogues;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Patch 2/9] U-boo
Hi,
Does U-boot have support for N810? I tried booting u-boot from TI for
OMAP2420 on n810; it didn't work - this is what i did :-
- took u-boot (ELF) from TI's website for OMAP2420
(http://linux.omap.com/pub/bootloader/h4/)
- invoked objcopy on u-boot.elf to convert it into u-boot.bin
- loaded u
Sascha,
> -Original Message-
> From: Sascha Hauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 10:58 AM
> To: Timur Tabi
> Cc: Menon, Nishanth; Laurent Desnogues; Kamat, Nishant; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> u-boot-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [Patch 0/9] U-boot
Remove duplicate definitions in include/lxt971a.h.
Remove duplicate registers and bits definitions in
include/lxt971a.h for standard MII registers, and
use values in include/miiphy.h instead.
Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/lxt972.c | 15 +++---
c
Remove duplicate code in cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/lxt972.c.
Remove duplicate code in a if/else block in
cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/lxt972.c.
Fixed style issues.
Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/lxt972.c | 39 ---
1 files
Ashish,
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Ashish Bijlani
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 11:01 AM
> To: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [U-Boot-Users] u-boot on N810
>
> - took u-boot (ELF) from TI's website for OMAP2420
>
Thanks for the response. Does u-boot support n810? Can I flash u-boot
on n810? Thanks.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Menon, Nishanth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ashish,
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Behalf Of Ashish Bijlani
>> Sent: W
navin karnam wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The flash chip in my board is Intel 28F256P33T
> which is not defined in the u-boot-1.1.6/include/flash.h
>
> Please guide what is the procedure i should follow to add it.
I suppose You haven't read a lot of your own thread..
Use CFI + add your flash ID.
http://ww
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:04:21AM -0500, Menon, Nishanth wrote:
> Hmm... flexibility Vs size.. the age old argument ;).
Well, the code we have in u2 today has shown that you can get both, if
done carefully :)
> When I started considering i2c I pulled code from U-Boot v1 and
> started putting in
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:39:30AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> > It does not have i2c support. And IMHO, using kernel like i2c
> > addition in U-Boot v2 is appropriate. Why this is not a bloat U-Boot
> > v2?
>
> If it isn't, then it means that U-Boot V2 will be pretty bloated in
> general.
Please h
Robert,
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Schwebel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 1:38 PM
> To: Menon, Nishanth
> Cc: Sascha Hauer; Timur Tabi; Laurent Desnogues; Kamat, Nishant; [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]; u-boot-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [P
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 07:33:50AM -0500, Menon, Nishanth wrote:
> include/linux/mod_devicetable.h | 382
>
This is u-boot, not linux. Please let's not introduce more of the
copy-and-paste things we have around from the past.
> +/*
> + * Device tables wh
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 01:48:26PM -0500, Menon, Nishanth wrote:
> What issues do you see with the proposed patch set I have send out -
> other than it bases itself on Linux kernel?
I've commented your first patch in the series; in short:
- It shows nicely that it is easy to copy things over
I have tried to speed up u-boot by turning on I/D cache during boot.
It sort of works and gives quite a boost but I'm having problems with
the ethernet driver that no longer works.
What I'm seeing is that the cpu do not notice the ethernet hardwares
updates that is located in DRAM. Basically w
Unlike other SOCs with e300 cores the 5121 is not cache coherent. The
problem is an internal bridge that the processor can not snoop across.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Kenneth Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have tried to speed up u-boot by turning on I/D cache during boot.
>
> It
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> --===0619104168==
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> cite="mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> type="cite">
> Andrejs Cainikovs href="mailto:[EMAIL
Hi all
While I was using the mx31_gpio_mux() function in cpu/arm1136/mx31/generic.c to
modify the IOMUX for some IO pads I discovered that only the first 256 pads can
be modified by this function.
It's pretty easy to fix this (see patch below) but I wonder if it's really the
right way to fix
Robert,
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Schwebel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 2:12 PM
> To: Menon, Nishanth
> Cc: Robert Schwebel; Sascha Hauer; Timur Tabi; Laurent Desnogues; Kamat,
> Nishant;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subj
Hi,
I'm new to U-Boot. Here I got some questions when I read the following code
in include/ppc_asm.tmpl:
#define START_GOT \
.section ".got2","aw"; \
.LCTOC1 = .+32768
#define END_GOT\
.text
#define GET_GOT\
bl 1f ; \
.text 2 ; \
0: .long .LCTOC1-1f ; \
.text ; \
1: mflr r14
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 03:21:02PM -0500, Menon, Nishanth wrote:
> > - Please don't bring in things which are not part of the current code
> > base. If you add code for subsystems, the subsystems must be there
> > first and *then* their users. Otherwhise we bloat the codebase and we
> > disab
Robert,
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Schwebel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 3:44 PM
> To: Menon, Nishanth
> Cc: Sascha Hauer; Timur Tabi; Laurent Desnogues; Kamat, Nishant; [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]; u-boot-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [
On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 13:38 -0600, John Rigby wrote:
> Unlike other SOCs with e300 cores the 5121 is not cache coherent. The
> problem is an internal bridge that the processor can not snoop across.
I do not have access to the manuals right now but I search all over an
this was not something I fou
Ashish Bijlani wrote:
> Thanks for the response. Does u-boot support n810? Can I flash u-boot
> on n810? Thanks.
No, you would need to port u-boot to the hardware. The OMAP and the
necessary built in peripherals shouldn't be a major problem, but you
would have to get the rest of the hardware li
Robert,
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Schwebel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 2:02 PM
> To: Menon, Nishanth
> Cc: Sascha Hauer; Laurent Desnogues; Kamat, Nishant; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> u-boot-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [Patch 1/9] U-
hey jerry...thanks for the replyi don't wanna replace nolo with
u-boot...i just wanna nolo to load u-boot instead of loading the
kernel directlythe reason is that i wanna load l4 based hypervisor
image first and then linux on top of itcurrent loader (nolo) is
linux specific and wouldn't
Sascha,
The following 3 patches are for cleaning up the bitops
> -Original Message-
> From: Sascha Hauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 10:51 AM
> To: Menon, Nishanth
> Cc: Kamat, Nishant; u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net; Laurent Desnogues;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED
Cleanup of ARM bitops functions. Introduce the findbits.S which allows for
optimized algo.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/arm/lib/Makefile|1
arch/arm/lib/findbit.S | 181 +++
include/asm-arm/bitops.h | 133
Use the asm-generic/bitops/xyz.h instead of using generic_xyz functions.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/asm-blackfin/bitops.h | 18 +-
include/asm-m68k/bitops.h | 18 +-
include/asm-ppc/bitops.h |9 -
include/linux/bitops.h
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/freescale/mpc8610hpcd/mpc8610hpcd.c |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/freescale/mpc8610hpcd/mpc8610hpcd.c
b/board/freescale/mpc8610hpcd/mpc8610hpcd.c
index c85f373..0bf21d5 100644
--- a/board
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/freescale/mpc8641hpcn/mpc8641hpcn.c |6 --
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/freescale/mpc8641hpcn/mpc8641hpcn.c
b/board/freescale/mpc8641hpcn/mpc8641hpcn.c
index cf540fc..b30c6b1 100644
--- a/boar
67 matches
Mail list logo
