Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] RSA depends on DM

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: We certainly must avoid the build break. My concern is that CONFIG_DM may introduce a run-time break. For example if you don't have pre-relocation malloc() available the board may not boot. Driver model is a fundamental core

[U-Boot] [PATCH] RSA depends on DM

Discovered while experimenting with signature checking on vexpress which doesn't typically use DM. Rather than complaining about unmet dependencies it might be better to enable those them. --- lib/rsa/Kconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/lib/rsa/Kconfig b/lib/rsa/Kconfig

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] RSA depends on DM

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: +Masahiro Hi Chris, On 3 February 2015 at 00:42, Chris Kuethe chris.kue...@gmail.com wrote: Discovered while experimenting with signature checking on vexpress which doesn't typically use DM. Rather than complaining about

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: switch armltd vexpress to GENERIC_BOARD

only tested tested under QEMU with vexpress_ca9x4 (-M vexpress-a9) and vexpress_ca15_tc2 (-M vexpress-a15). Makes the ugly warning go away. Signed-off-by: Chris Kuethe chris.kuethe+git...@gmail.com --- include/configs/vexpress_common.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] RSA depends on DM

Discovered while experimenting with signature checking on vexpress which doesn't typically use DM. --- Kconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/Kconfig b/Kconfig index fed488f..8090790 100644 --- a/Kconfig +++ b/Kconfig @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ config FIT_VERBOSE config

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: mx5: Add support for USB armory board

and...@inversepath.com Tested-by: Chris Kuethe chris.kuethe+git...@gmail.com = reset resetting ... U-Boot 2015.04-rc3-00209-ga74ef40-dirty (Mar 15 2015 - 22:04:22) CPU: Freescale i.MX53 rev2.1 at 800 MHz Reset cause: WDOG Board: Inverse Path USB armory MkI I2C: ready DRAM: 512 MiB MMC

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: mx5: Add support for USB armory board

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Chris Kuethe chris.kue...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:03 AM, and...@inversepath.com wrote: From: Andrej Rosano and...@inversepath.com Add support for Inverse Path USB armory board, an open source flash-drive sized computer based on Freescale

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] arm: mx5: Add support for USB armory board

and...@inversepath.com Cc: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de Cc: Chris Kuethe chris.kue...@gmail.com Cc: Fabio Estevam feste...@gmail.com Tested-by: Chris Kuethe chris.kue...@gmail.com --- I don't have the default kernel image in place; the board boots when I do point it at a valid image. U-Boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: mx5: Add support for USB armory board

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Fabio Estevam feste...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Chris Kuethe chris.kue...@gmail.com wrote: U-Boot 2015.04-rc3-00209-ga74ef40-dirty (Mar 15 2015 - 22:04:22) CPU: Freescale i.MX53 rev2.1 at 800 MHz Reset cause: WDOG Here the reset

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] arm: mx5: Add support for USB armory board

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Vagrant Cascadian vagr...@debian.org wrote: Unfortunately, this fails to build with numerous errors such as: Heh. I was just about to go investigate that. ... +#include config_distro_bootcmd.h + #define MEM_LAYOUT_ENV_SETTINGS \ This section works for me.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/2] ARM: mx5: add support for USB armory board

Any chance of this being accepted into 2015.04? On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Chris Kuethe chris.kue...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Andrej Rosano and...@inversepath.com wrote: Please note that the patch is prepared against imx tree and not the mainline one, where

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: mx5: Add support for USB armory board

I'll be able to test this next week, but I'd like to see usbarmory be a supported board. On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:03 AM, and...@inversepath.com wrote: From: Andrej Rosano and...@inversepath.com Add support for Inverse Path USB armory board, an open source flash-drive sized computer based on

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2] ARM: mx5: move to a standard arch/board approach

Babic sba...@denx.de Cc: Vagrant Cascadian vagr...@debian.org Tested-by: Chris Kuethe chris.kue...@gmail.com -- GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too? ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/2] ARM: mx5: add support for USB armory board

explicit GPIO input setup (all GPIO are input after reset) - Remove dummy board_late_init() and CONFIG_BOARD_LATE_INIT - Remove CONFIG_BOOTARGS - Fix compiling errors due to config_distro_bootcmd.h inclusion position Tested-by: Chris Kuethe chris.kue...@gmail.com Changes for v3: - Add

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/2] ARM: mx5: add support for USB armory board

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Andrej Rosano and...@inversepath.com wrote: Please note that the patch is prepared against imx tree and not the mainline one, where the arch/board approach is not yet merged. OK, it all works for me. -- GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix'

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: switch armltd vexpress to GENERIC_BOARD

Bump. Anyone want to comment or commit? http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/431675/ On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Chris Kuethe chris.kue...@gmail.com wrote: only tested tested under QEMU with vexpress_ca9x4 (-M vexpress-a9) and vexpress_ca15_tc2 (-M vexpress-a15). Makes the ugly warning go

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 1/2] ARM: mx5: move to a standard arch/board approach

sba...@denx.de Cc: Vagrant Cascadian vagr...@debian.org Tested-by: Chris Kuethe chris.kue...@gmail.com -- GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too? ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 2/2] ARM: mx5: add support for USB armory board

and...@inversepath.com Cc: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de Cc: Chris Kuethe chris.kue...@gmail.com Cc: Fabio Estevam feste...@gmail.com Cc: Vagrant Cascadian vagr...@debian.org Works for me Tested-by: Chris Kuethe chris.kue...@gmail.com ___ U-Boot mailing

Re: [U-Boot] patch - arm - define SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE for mx5

Bump... can this be merged? On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Fabio Estevam feste...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Chris Kuethe chris.kue...@gmail.com wrote: mx5 is a cortex-a8 which has 64 byte cache lines. i'll need this for adding gadget support to usbarmory, but it's

[U-Boot] patch: fix typo in mxc_hab docs

diff --git a/doc/README.mxc_hab b/doc/README.mxc_hab index a1b1d34..5fe977c 100644 --- a/doc/README.mxc_hab +++ b/doc/README.mxc_hab @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT CONFIG_SYS_FSL_SEC_COMPAT4 /* HAB version */ CONFIG_FSL_CAAM CONFIG_CMD_DEKBLOB -CONFIG_SYS_FSL_LE +CONFIG_SYS_FSL_SEC_LE

[U-Boot] patch - arm - define SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE for mx5

Kuethe chris.kue...@gmail.com Cc: Tom Rini tr...@konsulko.com Cc: Matthew Starr mst...@hedonline.com Cc: Andrej Rosano and...@inversepath.com Cc: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de Cc: Chris Kuethe chris.kue...@gmail.com Cc: Fabio Estevam feste...@gmail.com Cc: Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de diff --git

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] build: create time and date independent binary

On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Heiko Schocher h...@denx.de wrote: With this option enabled each compilation creates the exact same binary. There are no timestamps, with which a U-Boot binary can be identified. Works on usbarmory. Tested-by: Chris Kuethe chris.kue...@gmail.com

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] imx: imximage: add new CHECK/CLR BIT command

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote: While I agree we ought to use SPL as much as possible I also believe the DCD support should be as complete as possible; some people might have reasons to avoid the SPL and rely on DCD for it. Do you believe SPL