Hi Tom,
On 19 October 2016 at 09:39, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 09:36:52AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > On 10/18/2016 08:41 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > >Hi Stephen,
> > >
> > >On 18 October 2016 at 17:33, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > >>On 10/18/2016 05:08 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
On 10/19/2016 09:39 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 09:36:52AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/18/2016 08:41 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On 18 October 2016 at 17:33, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/18/2016 05:08 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On 18 October 2016 at 16
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 09:36:52AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/18/2016 08:41 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> >Hi Stephen,
> >
> >On 18 October 2016 at 17:33, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >>On 10/18/2016 05:08 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> >>>
> >>>Hi Stephen,
> >>>
> >>>On 18 October 2016 at 16:54, Stephe
On 10/18/2016 08:41 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On 18 October 2016 at 17:33, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/18/2016 05:08 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On 18 October 2016 at 16:54, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/18/2016 01:56 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On 18 October 201
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 09:59:02AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On 19 October 2016 at 09:39, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 09:36:52AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > > On 10/18/2016 08:41 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > >Hi Stephen,
> > > >
> > > >On 18 October 2016 at
Hi Stephen,
On 18 October 2016 at 17:33, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/18/2016 05:08 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> On 18 October 2016 at 16:54, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/18/2016 01:56 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On 18 October 2016 at 13:
On 10/18/2016 05:08 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On 18 October 2016 at 16:54, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/18/2016 01:56 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On 18 October 2016 at 13:10, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/18/2016 01:03 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On 18 October 201
Hi Stephen,
On 18 October 2016 at 16:54, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/18/2016 01:56 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> On 18 October 2016 at 13:10, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/18/2016 01:03 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On 18 October 2016 at 12:
On 10/17/2016 04:35 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren
>
> SoC-specific logic may be required for all forms of cache-wide
> operations; invalidate and flush of both dcache and icache (note that
> only 3 of the 4 possible combinations make sense, since the icache never
> contains dirt
On 10/18/2016 01:56 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On 18 October 2016 at 13:10, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/18/2016 01:03 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On 18 October 2016 at 12:58, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/18/2016 10:23 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On 17 October 201
On 10/18/2016 03:28 PM, york sun wrote:
On 10/18/2016 02:01 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/18/2016 12:40 PM, york sun wrote:
On 10/18/2016 11:14 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/18/2016 09:28 AM, york sun wrote:
On 10/17/2016 04:35 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
From: Stephen Warren
SoC-specifi
On 10/18/2016 02:01 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/18/2016 12:40 PM, york sun wrote:
>> On 10/18/2016 11:14 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 10/18/2016 09:28 AM, york sun wrote:
On 10/17/2016 04:35 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren
>
> SoC-specific logic may be r
Hi Stephen,
On 18 October 2016 at 13:10, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/18/2016 01:03 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> On 18 October 2016 at 12:58, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/18/2016 10:23 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On 17 October 2016 at 15:
On 10/18/2016 01:03 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On 18 October 2016 at 12:58, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/18/2016 10:23 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On 17 October 2016 at 15:35, Stephen Warren wrote:
From: Stephen Warren
SoC-specific logic may be required for all forms of c
Hi Stephen,
On 18 October 2016 at 12:58, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/18/2016 10:23 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> On 17 October 2016 at 15:35, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Stephen Warren
>>>
>>> SoC-specific logic may be required for all forms of cache-wide
>>> operatio
On 10/18/2016 12:40 PM, york sun wrote:
On 10/18/2016 11:14 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/18/2016 09:28 AM, york sun wrote:
On 10/17/2016 04:35 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
From: Stephen Warren
SoC-specific logic may be required for all forms of cache-wide
operations; invalidate and flush of
On 10/18/2016 10:23 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On 17 October 2016 at 15:35, Stephen Warren wrote:
From: Stephen Warren
SoC-specific logic may be required for all forms of cache-wide
operations; invalidate and flush of both dcache and icache (note that
only 3 of the 4 possible combina
On 10/18/2016 11:14 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/18/2016 09:28 AM, york sun wrote:
>> On 10/17/2016 04:35 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> From: Stephen Warren
>>>
>>> SoC-specific logic may be required for all forms of cache-wide
>>> operations; invalidate and flush of both dcache and icache (n
Hi Stephen,
On 17 October 2016 at 15:35, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren
>
> SoC-specific logic may be required for all forms of cache-wide
> operations; invalidate and flush of both dcache and icache (note that
> only 3 of the 4 possible combinations make sense, since the icache ne
On 10/18/2016 09:28 AM, york sun wrote:
On 10/17/2016 04:35 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
From: Stephen Warren
SoC-specific logic may be required for all forms of cache-wide
operations; invalidate and flush of both dcache and icache (note that
only 3 of the 4 possible combinations make sense, sinc
From: Stephen Warren
SoC-specific logic may be required for all forms of cache-wide
operations; invalidate and flush of both dcache and icache (note that
only 3 of the 4 possible combinations make sense, since the icache never
contains dirty lines). This patch adds an optional hook for all
implem
21 matches
Mail list logo
