Dear Peter Tyser,
In message 1239749550.24099.147.ca...@localhost.localdomain you wrote:
...
#1 is ugly in that 99.99% of the time an empty os_support.c file is
processed.
#2 is ugly in that the Makefile method to determine a target OS is
somewhat hokey and will only get hokier if/when
Hi Wolfgang,
#1 is ugly in that 99.99% of the time an empty os_support.c file is
processed.
#2 is ugly in that the Makefile method to determine a target OS is
somewhat hokey and will only get hokier if/when additional OS targets
are supported.
I'd vote for #1 as I think the
Hi Wolfgang,
On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 01:20 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Peter Tyser,
In message 1236988492-21295-28-git-send-email-pty...@xes-inc.com you wrote:
Add support for compiling the host tools in the tools directory using
the MinGW toolchain. This produces executables which
On Tuesday 14 April 2009 18:52:30 Peter Tyser wrote:
On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 01:20 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message Peter Tyser wrote:
Add support for compiling the host tools in the tools directory using
the MinGW toolchain. This produces executables which can be used on
standard
Dear Peter Tyser,
In message 1236988492-21295-28-git-send-email-pty...@xes-inc.com you wrote:
Add support for compiling the host tools in the tools directory using
the MinGW toolchain. This produces executables which can be used on
standard Windows computers without requiring cygwin.
One
5 matches
Mail list logo
