On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 6:18 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> Add simple and meaningful kconfig option for prcm.c
> instead of using MACH type on Makefile.
>
> PRCM (Power/Reset/Clock Management) is considered as a
> Multi-Functional Device, so used the same on Kconfig definition.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig | 7 +++
> arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Makefile | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig
> index 1fededd..2b9f48b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig
> @@ -6,6 +6,12 @@ config SPL_LDSCRIPT
> config IDENT_STRING
> default " Allwinner Technology"
>
> +config MFD_SUN6I_PRCM
> + bool "Allwinner A31 PRCM controller"
> + help
> + Support for the PRCM (Power/Reset/Clock Management) unit available
> + in A31 SoC.
> +
Do these entries even need to be visible?
It's not like it makes sense to toggle them independently.
This applies to almost all the patches in this series.
ChenYu
> config SUNXI_HIGH_SRAM
> bool
> default n
> @@ -87,6 +93,7 @@ config MACH_SUN6I
> select CPU_V7_HAS_NONSEC
> select CPU_V7_HAS_VIRT
> select ARCH_SUPPORT_PSCI
> + select MFD_SUN6I_PRCM
> select SUNXI_GEN_SUN6I
> select SUPPORT_SPL
> select ARMV7_BOOT_SEC_DEFAULT if OLD_SUNXI_KERNEL_COMPAT
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Makefile
> index 2a3c379..3c1c660 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Makefile
> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ obj-y += pinmux.o
> ifndef CONFIG_MACH_SUN9I
> obj-y += usb_phy.o
> endif
> -obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_SUN6I) += prcm.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_SUN6I_PRCM) += prcm.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_SUN8I) += prcm.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_SUN9I) += prcm.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_SUN6I) += p2wi.o
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> ___
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot@lists.denx.de
> https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
