subject:"Re\: \[U\-Boot\] \[PATCH v3 09\/15\] env\: Support multiple environments"

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

2018-02-07 Thread Simon Goldschmidt


On 07.02.2018 22:18, York Sun wrote:

On 02/07/2018 12:45 PM, Goldschmidt Simon wrote:

On 02/07/2018 21:18, York Sun wrote:

On 02/07/2018 12:43 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:

Hi,

On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:02:49PM +, York Sun wrote:

On 01/30/2018 12:16 PM, York Sun wrote:

On 01/30/2018 11:40 AM, York Sun wrote:

On 01/30/2018 12:19 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:

On 23.01.2018 21:16, Maxime Ripard wrote:

Now that we have everything in place to support multiple environment, let's
make sure the current code can use it.

The priority used between the various environment is the same one that was
used in the code previously.

At read / init times, the highest priority environment is going to be
detected,

Does priority handling really work here? Most env drivers seem to ignore
the return value of env_import and may thus return success although
importing the environment failed (only reading the data from the device
succeeded).

This is from reading the code, I haven't had a chance to test this, yet.

It is broken on my LS1043ARDB with simply NOR flash. I am trying to
determine what went wrong.


I found the problem. The variable "env_load_location" is static. It is
probably not write-able during booting from flash. It is expected to be
set during ENVOP_INIT. But if I print this variable, it has
ENVL_UNKNOWN. I can make it work by moving env_load_location to global
data structure.

That would work for me.

Actually I am not a big fun to using global data. It increases size for
everybody. But I don't see a way you can save the variable before
relocation.


That being said, this addition of multiple environments really slows
down the booting process for me. I see every time env_get_char() is
called, env_driver_lookup() runs. A simple call of env_get_f() gets
slowed down dramatically. I didn't find out where the most time is spent
yet.

Does anyone else experience this unbearable slowness?


I found the problem. In patch #3 in this series, the default get_char()
was dropped so there is no driver for a plain NOR flash. A quick (and
maybe dirty) fix is this


diff --git a/env/env.c b/env/env.c
index edfb575..210bae2 100644
--- a/env/env.c
+++ b/env/env.c
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ int env_get_char(int index)
 int ret;

 if (!drv->get_char)
-   continue;
+   return *(uchar *)(gd->env_addr + index);

 if (!env_has_inited(drv->location))
 continue;

And this too.

If you agree with this fix (actually revert your change earlier), I can
send out a patch.

I still think we should get rid of the 'get_char' callback for
the env drivers. While that could have made sense for some boards
before the conversion to multiple environments (although I
doubt that, as the environment is *not* checked for
validity in this call), its meaning is totally lost when having
multiple env drivers active.

The whole purpose of multiple env drivers is that we select a
valid driver in the 'load' callback. How could we possibly know
that the 'get_char' callback of the highest prio env driver is
what we want?

I'd rather make 'env_get_char' weak and let boards decide if they
really want this behaviour.

A quick search through the current code base shows me *no* usage
of 'get_char' in nvram.c (CONFIG_SYS_NVRAM_ACCESS_ROUTINE is never
defined) and only 7 defconfigs that use ENV_IS_IN_EEPROM:

 imx31_phycore_defconfig
 imx31_phycore_eet_defconfig
 km_kirkwood_128m16_defconfig
 km_kirkwood_defconfig
 km_kirkwood_pci_defconfig
 mgcoge3un_defconfig
 portl2_defconfig

Are these seven boards worth keeping this feature?


Simon,

Adding multiple environments seems to be an improvement. But this fell
through the cracks. I don't know if other boards also read env before
relocation. All my boards reads hwconfig before relocation. Having to
create a new function for all of them doesn't look appealing to me.


The change I proposed would be to restore the old behavior but kick out 
the byte-by-byte reading from eeprom and nvram. My understanding was you 
are using flash and were reading from environment in ram, not in nvram 
or eeprom.


Simon
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

2018-02-07 Thread York Sun

On 02/07/2018 12:45 PM, Goldschmidt Simon wrote:
> On 02/07/2018 21:18, York Sun wrote:
>> On 02/07/2018 12:43 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:02:49PM +, York Sun wrote:
 On 01/30/2018 12:16 PM, York Sun wrote:
> On 01/30/2018 11:40 AM, York Sun wrote:
>> On 01/30/2018 12:19 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
>>> On 23.01.2018 21:16, Maxime Ripard wrote:
 Now that we have everything in place to support multiple environment, 
 let's
 make sure the current code can use it.

 The priority used between the various environment is the same one that 
 was
 used in the code previously.

 At read / init times, the highest priority environment is going to be
 detected,
>>>
>>> Does priority handling really work here? Most env drivers seem to ignore
>>> the return value of env_import and may thus return success although
>>> importing the environment failed (only reading the data from the device
>>> succeeded).
>>>
>>> This is from reading the code, I haven't had a chance to test this, yet.
>>
>> It is broken on my LS1043ARDB with simply NOR flash. I am trying to
>> determine what went wrong.
>>
>
> I found the problem. The variable "env_load_location" is static. It is
> probably not write-able during booting from flash. It is expected to be
> set during ENVOP_INIT. But if I print this variable, it has
> ENVL_UNKNOWN. I can make it work by moving env_load_location to global
> data structure.
>>>
>>> That would work for me.

Actually I am not a big fun to using global data. It increases size for
everybody. But I don't see a way you can save the variable before
relocation.

>>>
> That being said, this addition of multiple environments really slows
> down the booting process for me. I see every time env_get_char() is
> called, env_driver_lookup() runs. A simple call of env_get_f() gets
> slowed down dramatically. I didn't find out where the most time is spent
> yet.
>
> Does anyone else experience this unbearable slowness?
>

 I found the problem. In patch #3 in this series, the default get_char()
 was dropped so there is no driver for a plain NOR flash. A quick (and
 maybe dirty) fix is this


 diff --git a/env/env.c b/env/env.c
 index edfb575..210bae2 100644
 --- a/env/env.c
 +++ b/env/env.c
 @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ int env_get_char(int index)
 int ret;

 if (!drv->get_char)
 -   continue;
 +   return *(uchar *)(gd->env_addr + index);

 if (!env_has_inited(drv->location))
 continue;
>>>
>>> And this too.
>>
>> If you agree with this fix (actually revert your change earlier), I can
>> send out a patch.
> 
> I still think we should get rid of the 'get_char' callback for
> the env drivers. While that could have made sense for some boards
> before the conversion to multiple environments (although I
> doubt that, as the environment is *not* checked for
> validity in this call), its meaning is totally lost when having
> multiple env drivers active.
> 
> The whole purpose of multiple env drivers is that we select a
> valid driver in the 'load' callback. How could we possibly know
> that the 'get_char' callback of the highest prio env driver is
> what we want?
> 
> I'd rather make 'env_get_char' weak and let boards decide if they
> really want this behaviour.
> 
> A quick search through the current code base shows me *no* usage
> of 'get_char' in nvram.c (CONFIG_SYS_NVRAM_ACCESS_ROUTINE is never
> defined) and only 7 defconfigs that use ENV_IS_IN_EEPROM:
> 
> imx31_phycore_defconfig
> imx31_phycore_eet_defconfig
> km_kirkwood_128m16_defconfig
> km_kirkwood_defconfig
> km_kirkwood_pci_defconfig
> mgcoge3un_defconfig
> portl2_defconfig
> 
> Are these seven boards worth keeping this feature?
> 

Simon,

Adding multiple environments seems to be an improvement. But this fell
through the cracks. I don't know if other boards also read env before
relocation. All my boards reads hwconfig before relocation. Having to
create a new function for all of them doesn't look appealing to me.

York
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

2018-02-07 Thread Goldschmidt Simon

On 02/07/2018 21:18, York Sun wrote:
> On 02/07/2018 12:43 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:02:49PM +, York Sun wrote:
>>> On 01/30/2018 12:16 PM, York Sun wrote:
 On 01/30/2018 11:40 AM, York Sun wrote:
> On 01/30/2018 12:19 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
>> On 23.01.2018 21:16, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>> Now that we have everything in place to support multiple environment, 
>>> let's
>>> make sure the current code can use it.
>>>
>>> The priority used between the various environment is the same one that 
>>> was
>>> used in the code previously.
>>>
>>> At read / init times, the highest priority environment is going to be
>>> detected,
>>
>> Does priority handling really work here? Most env drivers seem to ignore
>> the return value of env_import and may thus return success although
>> importing the environment failed (only reading the data from the device
>> succeeded).
>>
>> This is from reading the code, I haven't had a chance to test this, yet.
>
> It is broken on my LS1043ARDB with simply NOR flash. I am trying to
> determine what went wrong.
>

 I found the problem. The variable "env_load_location" is static. It is
 probably not write-able during booting from flash. It is expected to be
 set during ENVOP_INIT. But if I print this variable, it has
 ENVL_UNKNOWN. I can make it work by moving env_load_location to global
 data structure.
>>
>> That would work for me.
>>
 That being said, this addition of multiple environments really slows
 down the booting process for me. I see every time env_get_char() is
 called, env_driver_lookup() runs. A simple call of env_get_f() gets
 slowed down dramatically. I didn't find out where the most time is spent
 yet.

 Does anyone else experience this unbearable slowness?

>>>
>>> I found the problem. In patch #3 in this series, the default get_char()
>>> was dropped so there is no driver for a plain NOR flash. A quick (and
>>> maybe dirty) fix is this
>>>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/env/env.c b/env/env.c
>>> index edfb575..210bae2 100644
>>> --- a/env/env.c
>>> +++ b/env/env.c
>>> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ int env_get_char(int index)
>>> int ret;
>>>
>>> if (!drv->get_char)
>>> -   continue;
>>> +   return *(uchar *)(gd->env_addr + index);
>>>
>>> if (!env_has_inited(drv->location))
>>> continue;
>>
>> And this too.
> 
> If you agree with this fix (actually revert your change earlier), I can
> send out a patch.

I still think we should get rid of the 'get_char' callback for
the env drivers. While that could have made sense for some boards
before the conversion to multiple environments (although I
doubt that, as the environment is *not* checked for
validity in this call), its meaning is totally lost when having
multiple env drivers active.

The whole purpose of multiple env drivers is that we select a
valid driver in the 'load' callback. How could we possibly know
that the 'get_char' callback of the highest prio env driver is
what we want?

I'd rather make 'env_get_char' weak and let boards decide if they
really want this behaviour.

A quick search through the current code base shows me *no* usage
of 'get_char' in nvram.c (CONFIG_SYS_NVRAM_ACCESS_ROUTINE is never
defined) and only 7 defconfigs that use ENV_IS_IN_EEPROM:

imx31_phycore_defconfig
imx31_phycore_eet_defconfig
km_kirkwood_128m16_defconfig
km_kirkwood_defconfig
km_kirkwood_pci_defconfig
mgcoge3un_defconfig
portl2_defconfig

Are these seven boards worth keeping this feature?

Simon

>>
>>> With this temporary fix, my flash chip works again and I can boot all
>>> the way up in a timely manner. I still don't like to call
>>> env_driver_lookup() thousands of times to get a simple env variable.
>>>
>>> Can Maxime post a quick post soon?
>>
>> Given that you already made all the debugging, and the patches, and I
>> have no way to test, I guess it would make more sense if you did it :)
> 
> Yes, I have tested on my boards. I will send out this patch.
> 
> York
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

2018-02-07 Thread York Sun

On 02/07/2018 12:43 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:02:49PM +, York Sun wrote:
>> On 01/30/2018 12:16 PM, York Sun wrote:
>>> On 01/30/2018 11:40 AM, York Sun wrote:
 On 01/30/2018 12:19 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> On 23.01.2018 21:16, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> Now that we have everything in place to support multiple environment, 
>> let's
>> make sure the current code can use it.
>>
>> The priority used between the various environment is the same one that 
>> was
>> used in the code previously.
>>
>> At read / init times, the highest priority environment is going to be
>> detected,
>
> Does priority handling really work here? Most env drivers seem to ignore 
> the return value of env_import and may thus return success although 
> importing the environment failed (only reading the data from the device 
> succeeded).
>
> This is from reading the code, I haven't had a chance to test this, yet.

 It is broken on my LS1043ARDB with simply NOR flash. I am trying to
 determine what went wrong.

>>>
>>> I found the problem. The variable "env_load_location" is static. It is
>>> probably not write-able during booting from flash. It is expected to be
>>> set during ENVOP_INIT. But if I print this variable, it has
>>> ENVL_UNKNOWN. I can make it work by moving env_load_location to global
>>> data structure.
> 
> That would work for me.
> 
>>> That being said, this addition of multiple environments really slows
>>> down the booting process for me. I see every time env_get_char() is
>>> called, env_driver_lookup() runs. A simple call of env_get_f() gets
>>> slowed down dramatically. I didn't find out where the most time is spent
>>> yet.
>>>
>>> Does anyone else experience this unbearable slowness?
>>>
>>
>> I found the problem. In patch #3 in this series, the default get_char()
>> was dropped so there is no driver for a plain NOR flash. A quick (and
>> maybe dirty) fix is this
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/env/env.c b/env/env.c
>> index edfb575..210bae2 100644
>> --- a/env/env.c
>> +++ b/env/env.c
>> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ int env_get_char(int index)
>> int ret;
>>
>> if (!drv->get_char)
>> -   continue;
>> +   return *(uchar *)(gd->env_addr + index);
>>
>> if (!env_has_inited(drv->location))
>> continue;
> 
> And this too.

If you agree with this fix (actually revert your change earlier), I can
send out a patch.

> 
>> With this temporary fix, my flash chip works again and I can boot all
>> the way up in a timely manner. I still don't like to call
>> env_driver_lookup() thousands of times to get a simple env variable.
>>
>> Can Maxime post a quick post soon?
> 
> Given that you already made all the debugging, and the patches, and I
> have no way to test, I guess it would make more sense if you did it :)

Yes, I have tested on my boards. I will send out this patch.

York
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

2018-02-07 Thread Maxime Ripard

1;5002;0c
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 09:25:55AM +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> On 07.02.2018 09:19, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 09:09:07AM +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> > > On 23.01.2018 21:16, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > > Now that we have everything in place to support multiple environment, 
> > > > let's
> > > > make sure the current code can use it.
> > > I get more build errors testing this feature: there's a global variable
> > > 'env_ptr' declared in flash, nand, nvram and remote env drivers (declared 
> > > as
> > > extern in envrionment.h). From reading the code, it seems like these could
> > > just be changed to static, since 'env_ptr' is not used outside these
> > > drivers?
> > Given Joakim's comment, I guess we should keep them !static, rename
> > them to $env_env_ptr, and remove the definition in the
> > include/environment that doesn't seem used anywhere.
> 
> That's OK for me, I just wanted to point out the build error.
> 
> However, I do think that having unnecessary non-static global variables is
> not really good coding style as you risk name clashes. I'd really be
> interested in a reason for this.

If the relocation works with a static variable, I'm all for it.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://bootlin.com


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

2018-02-07 Thread Maxime Ripard

On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 08:45:46AM +, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> On Thu, 1970-01-01 at 00:00 +, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not 
> > click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know 
> > the content is safe.
> > 
> > 
> > On 06.02.2018 09:20, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > On Thu, 1970-01-01 at 00:00 +, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> > > 
> > > .
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara 
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard 
> > > > > ---
> > > > >env/env.c | 80 
> > > > > +++-
> > > > >1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/env/env.c b/env/env.c
> > > > > index 906f28ee50a1..1182fdb545db 100644
> > > > > --- a/env/env.c
> > > > > +++ b/env/env.c
> > > > > @@ -26,6 +26,41 @@ static struct env_driver *_env_driver_lookup(enum 
> > > > > env_location loc)
> > > > >return NULL;
> > > > >}
> > > > > 
> > > > > +static enum env_location env_locations[] = {
> > > 
> > > Don't use static/global variables. They cause a lot of relocation 
> > > work/size
> > > and is less flexible.
> > 
> > In this specific case, I think this array should be const anyway, would
> > that prevent the relocation problems you see?
> 
> > 
> > > There is no way to #define ENVL_EEPROM to a function
> > > when a variable.
> > 
> > ENVL_EEPROM is an enum value, why would you define it to a function?
> 
> I got boards that very similar but differ in where/how env. is
> stored, like different flash so I need to be able to select at
> runtime how get my env., I haven't looked if this particular area is
> affected but ideally I would like if all env. related "constants"
> could be impl. with a function instead.

It's exactly the point of this entire serie though, and why we merged
it.

You just need to override env_get_location in your board, and return
the preferred location.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://bootlin.com


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

2018-02-07 Thread Joakim Tjernlund

On Thu, 1970-01-01 at 00:00 +, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click 
> links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the 
> content is safe.
> 
> 
> On 06.02.2018 09:20, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > On Thu, 1970-01-01 at 00:00 +, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> > 
> > .
> > > > Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara 
> > > > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard 
> > > > ---
> > > >env/env.c | 80 
> > > > +++-
> > > >1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/env/env.c b/env/env.c
> > > > index 906f28ee50a1..1182fdb545db 100644
> > > > --- a/env/env.c
> > > > +++ b/env/env.c
> > > > @@ -26,6 +26,41 @@ static struct env_driver *_env_driver_lookup(enum 
> > > > env_location loc)
> > > >return NULL;
> > > >}
> > > > 
> > > > +static enum env_location env_locations[] = {
> > 
> > Don't use static/global variables. They cause a lot of relocation work/size
> > and is less flexible.
> 
> In this specific case, I think this array should be const anyway, would
> that prevent the relocation problems you see?

> 
> > There is no way to #define ENVL_EEPROM to a function
> > when a variable.
> 
> ENVL_EEPROM is an enum value, why would you define it to a function?

I got boards that very similar but differ in where/how env. is stored, like 
different
flash so I need to be able to select at runtime how get my env., I haven't
looked if this particular area is affected but ideally I would like if all
env. related "constants" could be impl. with a function instead.

Also, using static/global vars takes more space than simple assignments in 
code, ideally
everything needed early (before reloc/ in SPL) should avoid relocations to save 
space.

 Jocke
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

2018-02-07 Thread Maxime Ripard

Hi,

On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:02:49PM +, York Sun wrote:
> On 01/30/2018 12:16 PM, York Sun wrote:
> > On 01/30/2018 11:40 AM, York Sun wrote:
> >> On 01/30/2018 12:19 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> >>> On 23.01.2018 21:16, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>  Now that we have everything in place to support multiple environment, 
>  let's
>  make sure the current code can use it.
> 
>  The priority used between the various environment is the same one that 
>  was
>  used in the code previously.
> 
>  At read / init times, the highest priority environment is going to be
>  detected,
> >>>
> >>> Does priority handling really work here? Most env drivers seem to ignore 
> >>> the return value of env_import and may thus return success although 
> >>> importing the environment failed (only reading the data from the device 
> >>> succeeded).
> >>>
> >>> This is from reading the code, I haven't had a chance to test this, yet.
> >>
> >> It is broken on my LS1043ARDB with simply NOR flash. I am trying to
> >> determine what went wrong.
> >>
> > 
> > I found the problem. The variable "env_load_location" is static. It is
> > probably not write-able during booting from flash. It is expected to be
> > set during ENVOP_INIT. But if I print this variable, it has
> > ENVL_UNKNOWN. I can make it work by moving env_load_location to global
> > data structure.

That would work for me.

> > That being said, this addition of multiple environments really slows
> > down the booting process for me. I see every time env_get_char() is
> > called, env_driver_lookup() runs. A simple call of env_get_f() gets
> > slowed down dramatically. I didn't find out where the most time is spent
> > yet.
> > 
> > Does anyone else experience this unbearable slowness?
> > 
> 
> I found the problem. In patch #3 in this series, the default get_char()
> was dropped so there is no driver for a plain NOR flash. A quick (and
> maybe dirty) fix is this
> 
> 
> diff --git a/env/env.c b/env/env.c
> index edfb575..210bae2 100644
> --- a/env/env.c
> +++ b/env/env.c
> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ int env_get_char(int index)
> int ret;
> 
> if (!drv->get_char)
> -   continue;
> +   return *(uchar *)(gd->env_addr + index);
> 
> if (!env_has_inited(drv->location))
> continue;

And this too.

> With this temporary fix, my flash chip works again and I can boot all
> the way up in a timely manner. I still don't like to call
> env_driver_lookup() thousands of times to get a simple env variable.
> 
> Can Maxime post a quick post soon?

Given that you already made all the debugging, and the patches, and I
have no way to test, I guess it would make more sense if you did it :)

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://bootlin.com


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

2018-02-07 Thread Joakim Tjernlund

On Thu, 1970-01-01 at 00:00 +, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 08:20:49AM +, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > On Thu, 1970-01-01 at 00:00 +, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> > 
> > .
> > > > Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara 
> > > > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard 
> > > > ---
> > > >   env/env.c | 80 
> > > > +++-
> > > >   1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/env/env.c b/env/env.c
> > > > index 906f28ee50a1..1182fdb545db 100644
> > > > --- a/env/env.c
> > > > +++ b/env/env.c
> > > > @@ -26,6 +26,41 @@ static struct env_driver *_env_driver_lookup(enum 
> > > > env_location loc)
> > > >   return NULL;
> > > >   }
> > > > 
> > > > +static enum env_location env_locations[] = {
> > 
> > Don't use static/global variables. They cause a lot of relocation work/size
> > and is less flexible. There is no way to #define ENVL_EEPROM to a function 
> > when a variable.
> 
> Is that last sentence truncated?
> 
> Can you elaborate a bit more on what is the source of the relocation
> issues you're mentionning? Is that because of the section it ends up
> in?

Mainly that its adds relocation entries that take up space, more space than 
doing
a simple assignment directly in code.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

2018-02-07 Thread Simon Goldschmidt


On 06.02.2018 09:20, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:

On Thu, 1970-01-01 at 00:00 +, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:

.

Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara 
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass 
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard 
---
   env/env.c | 80 +++-
   1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/env/env.c b/env/env.c
index 906f28ee50a1..1182fdb545db 100644
--- a/env/env.c
+++ b/env/env.c
@@ -26,6 +26,41 @@ static struct env_driver *_env_driver_lookup(enum 
env_location loc)
   return NULL;
   }

+static enum env_location env_locations[] = {

Don't use static/global variables. They cause a lot of relocation work/size
and is less flexible.


In this specific case, I think this array should be const anyway, would 
that prevent the relocation problems you see?



There is no way to #define ENVL_EEPROM to a function
when a variable.


ENVL_EEPROM is an enum value, why would you define it to a function?

Simon




  Jocke


+#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_EEPROM
+ ENVL_EEPROM,
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FAT
+ ENVL_FAT,
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FLASH
+ ENVL_FLASH,
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_MMC
+ ENVL_MMC,
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_NAND
+ ENVL_NAND,
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_NVRAM
+ ENVL_NVRAM,
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_REMOTE
+ ENVL_REMOTE,
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_SPI_FLASH
+ ENVL_SPI_FLASH,
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_UBI
+ ENVL_UBI,
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_NOWHERE
+ ENVL_NOWHERE,
+#endif
+};
+
+static enum env_location env_load_location = ENVL_UNKNOWN;
+
   /**
* env_get_location() - Returns the best env location for a board
* @op: operations performed on the environment
@@ -45,36 +80,21 @@ static struct env_driver *_env_driver_lookup(enum 
env_location loc)
*/
   static enum env_location env_get_location(enum env_operation op, int prio)
   {
- /*
-  * We support a single environment, so any environment asked
-  * with a priority that is not zero is out of our supported
-  * bounds.
-  */
- if (prio >= 1)
- return ENVL_UNKNOWN;
-
- if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_EEPROM)
- return ENVL_EEPROM;
- else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FAT)
- return ENVL_FAT;
- else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FLASH)
- return ENVL_FLASH;
- else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_MMC)
- return ENVL_MMC;
- else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_NAND)
- return ENVL_NAND;
- else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_NVRAM)
- return ENVL_NVRAM;
- else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_REMOTE)
- return ENVL_REMOTE;
- else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_SPI_FLASH)
- return ENVL_SPI_FLASH;
- else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_UBI)
- return ENVL_UBI;
- else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_NOWHERE)
- return ENVL_NOWHERE;
- else
- return ENVL_UNKNOWN;
+ switch (op) {
+ case ENVOP_GET_CHAR:
+ case ENVOP_INIT:
+ case ENVOP_LOAD:
+ if (prio >= ARRAY_SIZE(env_locations))
+ return ENVL_UNKNOWN;
+
+ env_load_location = env_locations[prio];
+ return env_load_location;
+
+ case ENVOP_SAVE:
+ return env_load_location;
+ }
+
+ return ENVL_UNKNOWN;
   }



___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot


___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

2018-02-07 Thread Simon Goldschmidt


On 07.02.2018 09:19, Maxime Ripard wrote:

On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 09:09:07AM +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:

On 23.01.2018 21:16, Maxime Ripard wrote:

Now that we have everything in place to support multiple environment, let's
make sure the current code can use it.

I get more build errors testing this feature: there's a global variable
'env_ptr' declared in flash, nand, nvram and remote env drivers (declared as
extern in envrionment.h). From reading the code, it seems like these could
just be changed to static, since 'env_ptr' is not used outside these
drivers?

Given Joakim's comment, I guess we should keep them !static, rename
them to $env_env_ptr, and remove the definition in the
include/environment that doesn't seem used anywhere.


That's OK for me, I just wanted to point out the build error.

However, I do think that having unnecessary non-static global variables 
is not really good coding style as you risk name clashes. I'd really be 
interested in a reason for this.


Simon
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

2018-02-07 Thread Maxime Ripard

On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 09:09:07AM +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> On 23.01.2018 21:16, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Now that we have everything in place to support multiple environment, let's
> > make sure the current code can use it.
> 
> I get more build errors testing this feature: there's a global variable
> 'env_ptr' declared in flash, nand, nvram and remote env drivers (declared as
> extern in envrionment.h). From reading the code, it seems like these could
> just be changed to static, since 'env_ptr' is not used outside these
> drivers?

Given Joakim's comment, I guess we should keep them !static, rename
them to $env_env_ptr, and remove the definition in the
include/environment that doesn't seem used anywhere.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://bootlin.com


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

2018-02-07 Thread Maxime Ripard

Hi,

On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 08:20:49AM +, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> On Thu, 1970-01-01 at 00:00 +, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> 
> .
> > > Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara 
> > > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass 
> > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard 
> > > ---
> > >   env/env.c | 80 +++-
> > >   1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/env/env.c b/env/env.c
> > > index 906f28ee50a1..1182fdb545db 100644
> > > --- a/env/env.c
> > > +++ b/env/env.c
> > > @@ -26,6 +26,41 @@ static struct env_driver *_env_driver_lookup(enum 
> > > env_location loc)
> > >   return NULL;
> > >   }
> > > 
> > > +static enum env_location env_locations[] = {
> 
> Don't use static/global variables. They cause a lot of relocation work/size
> and is less flexible. There is no way to #define ENVL_EEPROM to a function 
> when a variable.

Is that last sentence truncated?

Can you elaborate a bit more on what is the source of the relocation
issues you're mentionning? Is that because of the section it ends up
in?

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://bootlin.com


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

2018-02-06 Thread Joakim Tjernlund

On Thu, 1970-01-01 at 00:00 +, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:

.
> > Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara 
> > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass 
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard 
> > ---
> >   env/env.c | 80 +++-
> >   1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/env/env.c b/env/env.c
> > index 906f28ee50a1..1182fdb545db 100644
> > --- a/env/env.c
> > +++ b/env/env.c
> > @@ -26,6 +26,41 @@ static struct env_driver *_env_driver_lookup(enum 
> > env_location loc)
> >   return NULL;
> >   }
> > 
> > +static enum env_location env_locations[] = {

Don't use static/global variables. They cause a lot of relocation work/size
and is less flexible. There is no way to #define ENVL_EEPROM to a function 
when a variable.

 Jocke

> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_EEPROM
> > + ENVL_EEPROM,
> > +#endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FAT
> > + ENVL_FAT,
> > +#endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FLASH
> > + ENVL_FLASH,
> > +#endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_MMC
> > + ENVL_MMC,
> > +#endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_NAND
> > + ENVL_NAND,
> > +#endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_NVRAM
> > + ENVL_NVRAM,
> > +#endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_REMOTE
> > + ENVL_REMOTE,
> > +#endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_SPI_FLASH
> > + ENVL_SPI_FLASH,
> > +#endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_UBI
> > + ENVL_UBI,
> > +#endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_NOWHERE
> > + ENVL_NOWHERE,
> > +#endif
> > +};
> > +
> > +static enum env_location env_load_location = ENVL_UNKNOWN;
> > +
> >   /**
> >* env_get_location() - Returns the best env location for a board
> >* @op: operations performed on the environment
> > @@ -45,36 +80,21 @@ static struct env_driver *_env_driver_lookup(enum 
> > env_location loc)
> >*/
> >   static enum env_location env_get_location(enum env_operation op, int prio)
> >   {
> > - /*
> > -  * We support a single environment, so any environment asked
> > -  * with a priority that is not zero is out of our supported
> > -  * bounds.
> > -  */
> > - if (prio >= 1)
> > - return ENVL_UNKNOWN;
> > -
> > - if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_EEPROM)
> > - return ENVL_EEPROM;
> > - else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FAT)
> > - return ENVL_FAT;
> > - else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FLASH)
> > - return ENVL_FLASH;
> > - else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_MMC)
> > - return ENVL_MMC;
> > - else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_NAND)
> > - return ENVL_NAND;
> > - else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_NVRAM)
> > - return ENVL_NVRAM;
> > - else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_REMOTE)
> > - return ENVL_REMOTE;
> > - else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_SPI_FLASH)
> > - return ENVL_SPI_FLASH;
> > - else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_UBI)
> > - return ENVL_UBI;
> > - else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_NOWHERE)
> > - return ENVL_NOWHERE;
> > - else
> > - return ENVL_UNKNOWN;
> > + switch (op) {
> > + case ENVOP_GET_CHAR:
> > + case ENVOP_INIT:
> > + case ENVOP_LOAD:
> > + if (prio >= ARRAY_SIZE(env_locations))
> > + return ENVL_UNKNOWN;
> > +
> > + env_load_location = env_locations[prio];
> > + return env_load_location;
> > +
> > + case ENVOP_SAVE:
> > + return env_load_location;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ENVL_UNKNOWN;
> >   }
> > 
> > 
> 
> ___
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot@lists.denx.de
> https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

2018-02-06 Thread Simon Goldschmidt


On 23.01.2018 21:16, Maxime Ripard wrote:

Now that we have everything in place to support multiple environment, let's
make sure the current code can use it.


I get more build errors testing this feature: there's a global variable 
'env_ptr' declared in flash, nand, nvram and remote env drivers 
(declared as extern in envrionment.h). From reading the code, it seems 
like these could just be changed to static, since 'env_ptr' is not used 
outside these drivers?


Simon



The priority used between the various environment is the same one that was
used in the code previously.

At read / init times, the highest priority environment is going to be
detected, and we'll use the same one without lookup during writes. This
should implement the same behaviour than we currently have.

Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara 
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass 
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard 
---
  env/env.c | 80 +++-
  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/env/env.c b/env/env.c
index 906f28ee50a1..1182fdb545db 100644
--- a/env/env.c
+++ b/env/env.c
@@ -26,6 +26,41 @@ static struct env_driver *_env_driver_lookup(enum 
env_location loc)
return NULL;
  }
  
+static enum env_location env_locations[] = {

+#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_EEPROM
+   ENVL_EEPROM,
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FAT
+   ENVL_FAT,
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FLASH
+   ENVL_FLASH,
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_MMC
+   ENVL_MMC,
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_NAND
+   ENVL_NAND,
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_NVRAM
+   ENVL_NVRAM,
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_REMOTE
+   ENVL_REMOTE,
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_SPI_FLASH
+   ENVL_SPI_FLASH,
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_UBI
+   ENVL_UBI,
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_NOWHERE
+   ENVL_NOWHERE,
+#endif
+};
+
+static enum env_location env_load_location = ENVL_UNKNOWN;
+
  /**
   * env_get_location() - Returns the best env location for a board
   * @op: operations performed on the environment
@@ -45,36 +80,21 @@ static struct env_driver *_env_driver_lookup(enum 
env_location loc)
   */
  static enum env_location env_get_location(enum env_operation op, int prio)
  {
-   /*
-* We support a single environment, so any environment asked
-* with a priority that is not zero is out of our supported
-* bounds.
-*/
-   if (prio >= 1)
-   return ENVL_UNKNOWN;
-
-   if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_EEPROM)
-   return ENVL_EEPROM;
-   else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FAT)
-   return ENVL_FAT;
-   else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FLASH)
-   return ENVL_FLASH;
-   else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_MMC)
-   return ENVL_MMC;
-   else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_NAND)
-   return ENVL_NAND;
-   else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_NVRAM)
-   return ENVL_NVRAM;
-   else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_REMOTE)
-   return ENVL_REMOTE;
-   else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_SPI_FLASH)
-   return ENVL_SPI_FLASH;
-   else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_UBI)
-   return ENVL_UBI;
-   else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_NOWHERE)
-   return ENVL_NOWHERE;
-   else
-   return ENVL_UNKNOWN;
+   switch (op) {
+   case ENVOP_GET_CHAR:
+   case ENVOP_INIT:
+   case ENVOP_LOAD:
+   if (prio >= ARRAY_SIZE(env_locations))
+   return ENVL_UNKNOWN;
+
+   env_load_location = env_locations[prio];
+   return env_load_location;
+
+   case ENVOP_SAVE:
+   return env_load_location;
+   }
+
+   return ENVL_UNKNOWN;
  }
  
  


___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

2018-01-30 Thread Simon Goldschmidt


On 31.01.2018 00:02, York Sun wrote:

On 01/30/2018 12:16 PM, York Sun wrote:

On 01/30/2018 11:40 AM, York Sun wrote:

On 01/30/2018 12:19 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:

On 23.01.2018 21:16, Maxime Ripard wrote:

Now that we have everything in place to support multiple environment, let's
make sure the current code can use it.

The priority used between the various environment is the same one that was
used in the code previously.

At read / init times, the highest priority environment is going to be
detected,

Does priority handling really work here? Most env drivers seem to ignore
the return value of env_import and may thus return success although
importing the environment failed (only reading the data from the device
succeeded).

This is from reading the code, I haven't had a chance to test this, yet.

It is broken on my LS1043ARDB with simply NOR flash. I am trying to
determine what went wrong.


I found the problem. The variable "env_load_location" is static. It is
probably not write-able during booting from flash. It is expected to be
set during ENVOP_INIT. But if I print this variable, it has
ENVL_UNKNOWN. I can make it work by moving env_load_location to global
data structure.

That being said, this addition of multiple environments really slows
down the booting process for me. I see every time env_get_char() is
called, env_driver_lookup() runs. A simple call of env_get_f() gets
slowed down dramatically. I didn't find out where the most time is spent
yet.

Does anyone else experience this unbearable slowness?


Yes. Depending on CPU speed... :-)

On my board, that slowdown comes from the fact that env_get_f does not 
check the return value of env_get_char for an error. That leads to 
trying for CONFIG_ENV_SIZE times, which is of course slow.

I'll post a fix for that.


I found the problem. In patch #3 in this series, the default get_char()
was dropped so there is no driver for a plain NOR flash. A quick (and
maybe dirty) fix is this


That patch #3 actually changed the behavior for all env drivers not 
providing .get_char (so all drivers except for eeprom and nvram) from 
returning what's behind gd->env_addr. Your patch below restores the old 
behaviour.


I can't tell what's the correct behaviour though: in my tests, env_get_f 
got called even after importing the environment, which is not what I 
would have expected...



diff --git a/env/env.c b/env/env.c
index edfb575..210bae2 100644
--- a/env/env.c
+++ b/env/env.c
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ int env_get_char(int index)
 int ret;

 if (!drv->get_char)
-   continue;
+   return *(uchar *)(gd->env_addr + index);

 if (!env_has_inited(drv->location))
 continue;

With this temporary fix, my flash chip works again and I can boot all
the way up in a timely manner. I still don't like to call
env_driver_lookup() thousands of times to get a simple env variable.


That's not a thing Maxime has changed but a change that came in when 
adding environment drivers.


Simon



Can Maxime post a quick post soon?

York



___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

2018-01-30 Thread York Sun

On 01/30/2018 12:16 PM, York Sun wrote:
> On 01/30/2018 11:40 AM, York Sun wrote:
>> On 01/30/2018 12:19 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
>>> On 23.01.2018 21:16, Maxime Ripard wrote:
 Now that we have everything in place to support multiple environment, let's
 make sure the current code can use it.

 The priority used between the various environment is the same one that was
 used in the code previously.

 At read / init times, the highest priority environment is going to be
 detected,
>>>
>>> Does priority handling really work here? Most env drivers seem to ignore 
>>> the return value of env_import and may thus return success although 
>>> importing the environment failed (only reading the data from the device 
>>> succeeded).
>>>
>>> This is from reading the code, I haven't had a chance to test this, yet.
>>
>> It is broken on my LS1043ARDB with simply NOR flash. I am trying to
>> determine what went wrong.
>>
> 
> I found the problem. The variable "env_load_location" is static. It is
> probably not write-able during booting from flash. It is expected to be
> set during ENVOP_INIT. But if I print this variable, it has
> ENVL_UNKNOWN. I can make it work by moving env_load_location to global
> data structure.
> 
> That being said, this addition of multiple environments really slows
> down the booting process for me. I see every time env_get_char() is
> called, env_driver_lookup() runs. A simple call of env_get_f() gets
> slowed down dramatically. I didn't find out where the most time is spent
> yet.
> 
> Does anyone else experience this unbearable slowness?
> 

I found the problem. In patch #3 in this series, the default get_char()
was dropped so there is no driver for a plain NOR flash. A quick (and
maybe dirty) fix is this


diff --git a/env/env.c b/env/env.c
index edfb575..210bae2 100644
--- a/env/env.c
+++ b/env/env.c
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ int env_get_char(int index)
int ret;

if (!drv->get_char)
-   continue;
+   return *(uchar *)(gd->env_addr + index);

if (!env_has_inited(drv->location))
continue;

With this temporary fix, my flash chip works again and I can boot all
the way up in a timely manner. I still don't like to call
env_driver_lookup() thousands of times to get a simple env variable.

Can Maxime post a quick post soon?

York
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

2018-01-30 Thread York Sun

On 01/30/2018 11:40 AM, York Sun wrote:
> On 01/30/2018 12:19 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
>> On 23.01.2018 21:16, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>> Now that we have everything in place to support multiple environment, let's
>>> make sure the current code can use it.
>>>
>>> The priority used between the various environment is the same one that was
>>> used in the code previously.
>>>
>>> At read / init times, the highest priority environment is going to be
>>> detected,
>>
>> Does priority handling really work here? Most env drivers seem to ignore 
>> the return value of env_import and may thus return success although 
>> importing the environment failed (only reading the data from the device 
>> succeeded).
>>
>> This is from reading the code, I haven't had a chance to test this, yet.
> 
> It is broken on my LS1043ARDB with simply NOR flash. I am trying to
> determine what went wrong.
> 

I found the problem. The variable "env_load_location" is static. It is
probably not write-able during booting from flash. It is expected to be
set during ENVOP_INIT. But if I print this variable, it has
ENVL_UNKNOWN. I can make it work by moving env_load_location to global
data structure.

That being said, this addition of multiple environments really slows
down the booting process for me. I see every time env_get_char() is
called, env_driver_lookup() runs. A simple call of env_get_f() gets
slowed down dramatically. I didn't find out where the most time is spent
yet.

Does anyone else experience this unbearable slowness?

York
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

2018-01-30 Thread York Sun

On 01/30/2018 12:19 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> On 23.01.2018 21:16, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> Now that we have everything in place to support multiple environment, let's
>> make sure the current code can use it.
>>
>> The priority used between the various environment is the same one that was
>> used in the code previously.
>>
>> At read / init times, the highest priority environment is going to be
>> detected,
> 
> Does priority handling really work here? Most env drivers seem to ignore 
> the return value of env_import and may thus return success although 
> importing the environment failed (only reading the data from the device 
> succeeded).
> 
> This is from reading the code, I haven't had a chance to test this, yet.

It is broken on my LS1043ARDB with simply NOR flash. I am trying to
determine what went wrong.

York
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

2018-01-30 Thread Simon Goldschmidt


On 23.01.2018 21:16, Maxime Ripard wrote:

Now that we have everything in place to support multiple environment, let's
make sure the current code can use it.

The priority used between the various environment is the same one that was
used in the code previously.

At read / init times, the highest priority environment is going to be
detected,


Does priority handling really work here? Most env drivers seem to ignore 
the return value of env_import and may thus return success although 
importing the environment failed (only reading the data from the device 
succeeded).


This is from reading the code, I haven't had a chance to test this, yet.


  and we'll use the same one without lookup during writes. This
should implement the same behaviour than we currently have.


Is there a way to save the environment to drivers other than the one 
selected at init time?


Regards,
Simon



Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara 
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass 
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard 
---
  env/env.c | 80 +++-
  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/env/env.c b/env/env.c
index 906f28ee50a1..1182fdb545db 100644
--- a/env/env.c
+++ b/env/env.c
@@ -26,6 +26,41 @@ static struct env_driver *_env_driver_lookup(enum 
env_location loc)
return NULL;
  }
  
+static enum env_location env_locations[] = {

+#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_EEPROM
+   ENVL_EEPROM,
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FAT
+   ENVL_FAT,
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FLASH
+   ENVL_FLASH,
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_MMC
+   ENVL_MMC,
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_NAND
+   ENVL_NAND,
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_NVRAM
+   ENVL_NVRAM,
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_REMOTE
+   ENVL_REMOTE,
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_SPI_FLASH
+   ENVL_SPI_FLASH,
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_UBI
+   ENVL_UBI,
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_NOWHERE
+   ENVL_NOWHERE,
+#endif
+};
+
+static enum env_location env_load_location = ENVL_UNKNOWN;
+
  /**
   * env_get_location() - Returns the best env location for a board
   * @op: operations performed on the environment
@@ -45,36 +80,21 @@ static struct env_driver *_env_driver_lookup(enum 
env_location loc)
   */
  static enum env_location env_get_location(enum env_operation op, int prio)
  {
-   /*
-* We support a single environment, so any environment asked
-* with a priority that is not zero is out of our supported
-* bounds.
-*/
-   if (prio >= 1)
-   return ENVL_UNKNOWN;
-
-   if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_EEPROM)
-   return ENVL_EEPROM;
-   else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FAT)
-   return ENVL_FAT;
-   else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FLASH)
-   return ENVL_FLASH;
-   else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_MMC)
-   return ENVL_MMC;
-   else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_NAND)
-   return ENVL_NAND;
-   else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_NVRAM)
-   return ENVL_NVRAM;
-   else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_REMOTE)
-   return ENVL_REMOTE;
-   else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_SPI_FLASH)
-   return ENVL_SPI_FLASH;
-   else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_UBI)
-   return ENVL_UBI;
-   else if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENV_IS_NOWHERE)
-   return ENVL_NOWHERE;
-   else
-   return ENVL_UNKNOWN;
+   switch (op) {
+   case ENVOP_GET_CHAR:
+   case ENVOP_INIT:
+   case ENVOP_LOAD:
+   if (prio >= ARRAY_SIZE(env_locations))
+   return ENVL_UNKNOWN;
+
+   env_load_location = env_locations[prio];
+   return env_load_location;
+
+   case ENVOP_SAVE:
+   return env_load_location;
+   }
+
+   return ENVL_UNKNOWN;
  }
  
  


___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/15] env: Support multiple environments

20 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information