Kever,
> On 13 Apr 2018, at 09:51, Kever Yang wrote:
> On 04/08/2018 09:45 AM, Kever Yang wrote:
>
+__weak int arch_cpu_init(void)
+{
+return 0;
+}
+
+__weak int rk_board_init_f(void)
+{
+return 0;
+}
>>> This doesn't really help in modularisi
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 03:51:07PM +0800, Kever Yang wrote:
> Hi Philipp,
>
>
> On 04/08/2018 09:45 AM, Kever Yang wrote:
> >>> +__weak int arch_cpu_init(void)
> >>> +{
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +__weak int rk_board_init_f(void)
> >>> +{
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +}
> >> This d
Hi Philipp,
On 04/08/2018 09:45 AM, Kever Yang wrote:
>>> +__weak int arch_cpu_init(void)
>>> +{
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +__weak int rk_board_init_f(void)
>>> +{
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>> This doesn't really help in modularising our board-support and I am
>> not a fan of adding som
> On 10 Apr 2018, at 14:32, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:54:09PM +0800, Kever Yang wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>>
>> On 04/09/2018 06:35 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
I have do a lot of test and re-work in my local branch and at last make
it landed in
rockchip vendor U-Boot, wi
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:54:09PM +0800, Kever Yang wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
>
> On 04/09/2018 06:35 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >> I have do a lot of test and re-work in my local branch and at last make
> >> it landed in
> >> rockchip vendor U-Boot, with testing in most of SoCs(not including
> >> rk3066/rk
Hi Tom,
On 04/09/2018 06:35 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> I have do a lot of test and re-work in my local branch and at last make
>> it landed in
>> rockchip vendor U-Boot, with testing in most of SoCs(not including
>> rk3066/rk3188).
>> Well, I do try to split it into pieces, but I found that actually
Kever,
> On 8 Apr 2018, at 03:45, Kever Yang wrote:
>
> Philipp,
>
>
> On 04/02/2018 05:28 AM, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018, Kever Yang wrote:
>>
>>> We use common board/spl/tpl file for all rockchip SoCs,
>>> - all the SoC spec setting should move into SoC file like
Kever,
> On 9 Apr 2018, at 00:35, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 09:45:22AM +0800, Kever Yang wrote:
>> Philipp,
>>
>>
>> On 04/02/2018 05:28 AM, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018, Kever Yang wrote:
>>>
We use common board/spl/tpl file for all rockchip
On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 09:45:22AM +0800, Kever Yang wrote:
> Philipp,
>
>
> On 04/02/2018 05:28 AM, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 27 Mar 2018, Kever Yang wrote:
> >
> >> We use common board/spl/tpl file for all rockchip SoCs,
> >> - all the SoC spec setting should move into SoC file
Philipp,
On 04/02/2018 05:28 AM, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018, Kever Yang wrote:
>
>> We use common board/spl/tpl file for all rockchip SoCs,
>> - all the SoC spec setting should move into SoC file like rk3288.c;
>> - tpl is option and only purpose to init DRAM, clock, uart(op
On Tue, 27 Mar 2018, Kever Yang wrote:
We use common board/spl/tpl file for all rockchip SoCs,
- all the SoC spec setting should move into SoC file like rk3288.c;
- tpl is option and only purpose to init DRAM, clock, uart(option);
- spl do secure relate one time init, boot device select, boot
> We use common board/spl/tpl file for all rockchip SoCs,
> - all the SoC spec setting should move into SoC file like rk3288.c;
> - tpl is option and only purpose to init DRAM, clock, uart(option);
> - spl do secure relate one time init, boot device select, boot into
> U-Boot or trust or OS in fa
12 matches
Mail list logo