But simply saying that it makes no difference in any case is not true.
Re-read my post. Did I say that it makes no difference?
I believe the upshot was, bowing to Yogi Berra on his 80th, that the
difference ain't what it used to be.
Our greatest duty in this life is to help others. And please,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Roger Glenfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Payback during 2nd generation Pick was 10-20 attributes. Back then,
the problem was to not oversize because it slowed down the read/writing
of the blank attributes.
Didn't we hear/read recently that the new compiler and/or
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Richard Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
We are faced with this same situation and the thought behind this truly
baffles me. Why take a flexible, dynamic database system and force it to
be fixed length. This is what you are doing using dimensioned arrays and
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Richard Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Yes I have compared the performance. Within the ERP system I worked in we
saw little difference. Yes dimensioned arrays MAY have some advantage
under certain circumstances, but reading and accessing fields in a record
is not
From: Clifton Oliver
Always remember that you should never believe any rule containing
the
words 'always' or 'never'.
Its corollary:
All truth is relative.
and
We will not tolerate intolerance.
taught in all seriousness by Postmodern liberal arts professors.
And exactly opposite
KraftMaid Cabinetry is the world's largest cabinet producer. We are located in
the heart of Amish country in Geauga county, Ohio, but less that an hour from
downtown Cleveland.
Kraftmaid is seeking an experienced U2 developer for full-time salaried
employment. 5+ years
programming experience
I don't recall InfoBasic dynamic arrays ever being limited to 1 or 2
dimensions, but then, I didn't start working with PI until the early 80's.
As far back as I can recall ('79 or so, on a Microdata Reality system)
dynamic arrays supported three dimensions.
So, enlighten me :-D
Larry Hiscock
D'oh! Disregard last post. I'm working on too little sleep. DIMENSIONED
arrays, not dynamic ...
Larry Hiscock
Western Computer Services
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Larry Hiscock
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 2:42 PM
To:
Two wonderful new data types.
Dymanic arrays presumably store data that are changing extremely rapidly.
I guess Dimenssioned arrays store Scandinavian data.
=8^D
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Dude, you've been working with NLS too much.
;-)
--
Regards,
Clif
On May 14, 2005, at 4:51 PM, Ray Wurlod wrote:
Two wonderful new data types.
Dymanic arrays presumably store data that are changing extremely
rapidly.
I guess Dimenssioned arrays store Scandinavian data.
=8^D
---
u2-users
10 matches
Mail list logo
