Re: [U2] THE variable names

In a message dated 7/18/2005 2:21:26 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: lol - ok - not confusing ? I don't have the direct quote but i beleive you stated that remove still confuses you. Then you are mistaken. Remove does not confuse me. Remove unnecessarily confuses

RE: [U2] mu2sings

Stuart.Boydell wrote: People have already mentioned how useful it would be to have internal subroutine indirection, eg. mySub = 'blah' gosub @mySub I missed the thread that showed this but I'd do it like this: -- G.Keys = blah bling blang convert to @am in G.Keys ... mySub

RE: [U2] Socket universe vs d3

Processes operating as socket servers can only serve one process at a time, regardless of which OS or DBMS platform creates the socket. SO$REUSEADDR is intended to eliminate the TIME_WAIT state if the process running the listener happens to die. If there is no step in U2 between init and accept

RE: [U2] monitoring tool for universe [ad?]

I've noticed that there hasn't been much of a response to this thread. One project that we started but temporarily postponed is a monitoring tool for MV VARs and Support providers to monitor remote client systems for conditions before they became problems. This would include the OS, DBMS, and

[U2] dll File (u2libeay32.dll)

Can anybody tell me what this file does, as it has caused some problems with 3rd party products and when we rename it to u2libeay32.old, all seems to work, I am just worried that I might have missed something. Regards Bjvrn

RE: [U2] dll File (u2libeay32.dll)

Bjorn, A quick look with Dependency Walker shows it is exporting a set of functions for SSL, RSA encryption and certificate (X509) services. So I guess it is part of the UniVerse SSL support. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

RE: [U2] UV Pre-printed forms

TEST -Original Message- From: Marilyn Hilb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 12:13 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] UV Pre-printed forms I would like to add that we don't need a new memory cartridge using this method every time we change

RE: [U2] dll File (u2libeay32.dll)

SSLeay was an SSL library originally created by Eric Young (eay). It was eventually absorbed into the openSSL project (openssl.org). So my guess is that when u2 added SSL socket encryption, they went with open source? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [U2] THE variable names

Will Johnson wrote on Tue, 19 Jul 2005 01:55:51 EDT Remove does not confuse me. Remove unnecessarily confuses other people. ... READNEXT works just find for processing a multi-item list just as REMOVE does and it's much more widely used and understood. So I see no point to the Remove

RE: [U2] dll File (u2libeay32.dll)

The fact that renaming it makes things work OK seems to point out a versioning issue. This file is based on SSLEAY, from which OpenSSL is derived. It looks like each U2 DBMS product and UniDK installs its own version of this u2libeay32.dll and u2ssleay32.dll too. By commenting one file out,

RE: [U2] mu2sings {Unclassified}

To answer the mysterious SYSTEM(xx)entries: 44 returns the # of processes (not seats in use) 51 device license info for SB+ 62 value of uvconfig tunable MODFPTRS 63 value of uvconfig tunable BLKMAX 64 value of uvconfig tunable MAXKEYSIZE 1002 indicates if file is in rotating file

[U2] Viaduct data transfer

I am working on a project to copy a DOS file to a Pick file using Viaduct and then update the system with this data. I have found some similar programs to use, but I do not know what the command is doing or what the parameters mean. The manuals don't offer much help either. Any help would be

RE: [U2] mu2sings {Unclassified}

Thanks, Glen, now added to my list -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn Herbert Sent: Wednesday, 20 July 2005 01:35 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] mu2sings

[U2] [AD] Short Term Problem [/AD]

[AD] All, I've just had a two-day-a-week contract back out at the last minute. If anyone is looking for consulting - Any MV, Business Workflow, Integration, etc. - I need to fill that slot. My resume is at: http://cdb.keyally.com/. - Charles Barouch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [/AD] ---

[U2] DATABASE write problem

POSTED FOR NON-MEMBER Anmol Chandrakant Khopade [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, I am facing a problem wherein a WRITE operation to a type 19 file is failing in some cases. The call to STATUS() function within the ON ERROR clause returns error 40019. Strangely this problem does not occur for all the

[U2] DATABASE write problem

Hi, I am facing a problem wherein a WRITE operation to a type 19 file is failing in some cases. The call to STATUS() function within the ON ERROR clause returns error 40019. Strangely this problem does not occur for all the writes operations, but approximately 100 times (out of 60K write

RE: [U2] DATABASE write problem

The entry for 40019 in the SYS.MESSAGE file isn't too helpful... CT SYS.MESSAGE 040019 040019 0001 WRITE failure. 0002 I would suspect that the write is failing at the O/S level. A starting point would be to check system logs for disk errors, etc. HTH Jeff Fitzgerald Fitzgerald Long,

Re: [U2] THE variable names

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes Not directed at you Mark, but someone mentioned that Remove has been around a long time. Not so. REMOVE was not added to the ADDS environment until perhaps around the mid 80s or so. And I still find it much more confusing that simply

Re: [U2] Socket universe vs d3

Tony, I don't do U2 sockets but I'm guessing Craig's code is missing something. In socket comms, you wait on the listen, accept a connection, do whatever you need, then go back to listen. Looping on accept is OK but after the repeat you have to go back to listening, and that shouldn't mean

RE: [U2] DATABASE write problem

Is there a possibility that the consumer is opening and processing through a file that is being reopened in the creator? There might be some weird OS timing issues in that situation. We ran into this a while back with our credit card server; for drop file interfaces we had to follow a specific

RE: [U2] Socket universe vs d3

D3 works just like UV in this regard, only one process can listen on a socket port at any given time, processes can't be forked or otherwise handed off, etc. As I said though, after the code has exhausted all of your inbound connections via Accept, it needs to go back to a Listen which, depending

RE: [U2] THE variable names

It is not surprising that the pick market has a bit of a dinosaur-esqe image, as it would seem that many of us are still coding around bugs that were fixed 20 or more years ago. I can't speak for others, but it seems to me that 1985 was ONE HELL OF A LONG TIME AGO as regards to the computer

RE: [U2] dll File (u2libeay32.dll)

Thanks all for your help. I got this from someone else and it might just interest all you running Crystal Reports. U2 SSL Stops Crystal Reports from Printing The U2 implementation of Secure Sockets Layer

RE: [U2] Viaduct data transfer

I don't know if this wil work on Pick D3, but this is how we do it on UniVerse (PICK Flavor), Windows 2003 This entry sits in the VOC PS:Replace the '[info]' with your own info 0001 PA 0002 C 0003 IF I2,Is it alright to copy the EFT files to the local drive [Y]es/[N]o , Y OR N = N THEN GO