I never could get VSG to work in a Datatel account, but I followed the
instructions Simon posted to run 'sql' and exit, then call
'SCHEMA_MIGRATE' to create the files.
http://www.mail-archive.com/u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org/msg12006.html
After that, when I try to access a file such as STAFF, I
Tim,
Was transaction logging or data replication used?
Can you share any interesting performance stats comparing w/ vs w/o TX
or DR?
cds
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Stevenson, Charles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on
11/22/2005 11:44:26 AM:
Tim,
Was transaction logging or data replication used?
You're not the first person to ask that. Unfortunately these were not
part of the goals of this load test.
Can you share any interesting performance stats
I'm not sure what you mean - there was no encryption in this app.
Data entry applied barcodes to film canisters. The film sorting robot read
the barcode and passed it (through DEVICE - what fun) to a routine that
looked up order characteristics (e.g. 2 sets of 4x6 prints, slides, CD,
express
Andy,
We had a similar problem here with UniData.
Even though the user had unix 'secondary' group access to the data files,
UDODBC did not look beyond the unix 'primary' group access.
Once we changed the users to match the unix 'primary' group access of the
data file(s), the error went
I suppose the test envirnoment has been disassembled already, but it
sure would be good to turn on logging give it a nother go. Can you
keep that in mind for the future?
TXLG is expected by people I deal with. They don't take UV seriously
without Transaction Logging (meaning update logging).
Does anyone know of a way to run PORT.STATUS externally? I want to
process it's output in a shell script without the overhead of starting
up uvsh. Something akin to running smat -r to get the same output as
LIST.READU from with uvsh. Any ideas?
Thanks.
Perry Taylor
Senior Multi-Value System
Stevenson, Charles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/22/2005
12:59:53 PM:
I suppose the test environment has been disassembled already, but it
sure would be good to turn on logging give it a nother go. Can you
keep that in mind for the future?
The system has been dismantled, so there's no
001 V
002 1
003
004 Count
005 10R
006 S
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Trebbien
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 12:02 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Anyone know how to define dict item to count lines
Good Day!
You might try
I
@RECORD;DCOUNT(@1,@FM)
MD0,
Count
5R
S
Tom Dodds
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Note: New phone number
708-234-9608
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Trebbien
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 1:02 PM
To:
If you display the VOC entry for PORT.STATUS you'll see it calls
list_readu. Just cd /u1/uv/bin then ln list_readu port.status.
Then you can run port.status at the unix level.
HTH
Rod Hills
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Perry Taylor
Bar codes tend to be long as well. For UPC, the first section may be
repetitive, thus can be omitted.
I'm dealing with 20 digit numbers of no apparent syntax. They belong to my
client's external customer.
My request was a way to hand-type less than 20 to get 20 without a
cheat-sheet or other
I did not explain very well, I had meant to number the lines sequentially,
here's an example from a UniVerse system (pick flavor):
LIST PARTS ZCOUNT 12:45:21pm 22 Nov 2005 PAGE1
PARTS... Counter
955-03 1
955-02 2
JB
Thank you, Rod! That worked just right!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rod Hills
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 12:50 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] PORT.STATUS From Unix
If you display the VOC entry for
You're probably looking for @NI
Try LIST VOC EVAL @NI or create an I-descriptor with @NI on line 2.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Trebbien
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 11:02 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2]
Tim,
Thanks for the additional information.
An idea on the 'list price' cost of the target p590 system with 64 dual
core CPUs and 124GB memory would be helpful, also information on how
this was achieved, particularly as the IBM web-site says the p590 maxes
out at 32 CPUs (2 'books' of 2 8-chip
I've seen a couple of good guesses but I don't think they will do what
you've asked for. Here is the I-Descriptor you're looking for.
1 I
2 @NI
3
4 LINE COUNT
5 10R
6 S
This works in UV. I don't have a UD system to try it on.
HTH,
Gordon
Gordon J. Glorfield
Sr. Applications Developer
USE the built in dict of *A9998 and it will do it for you
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Trebbien
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 1:42 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Anyone know how to define dict item to
LIST PARTS EVAL @NI FMT 3R 04:36:00pm 22 Nov 2005 PAGE1
PARTS. @NI
TARP-GHZPDT-CFG 1
42H1128 2
2108503 3
0511045219-008 4
7258940 5
3769333 6
NAI-DAE50036S7
PS1520-108
3C8228C 9
2657
HENDERSON MIKE, MR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/22/2005
04:03:39 PM:
An idea on the 'list price' cost of the target p590 system with 64 dual
core CPUs and 124GB memory would be helpful, also information on how
this was achieved, particularly as the IBM web-site says the p590 maxes
out at 32
yeahbut, be careful not to leave the semaphore set via miss-typing:
For examplem if you did:
$port.status | asdfasf (where asdfasf is garbage.)
You'll need superuser (or uv administrator?) to do
UNLOCK PSTATLOCK SEMAPHORE
from TCL.
From: Rod Hills
If you display the VOC entry for
What would be the indications/complications of this happening?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stevenson,
Charles
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 3:12 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] PORT.STATUS From Unix
Daniel,
SQL is pretty insistent on data being what it is defined as (a feature
for some .. a drawback for others)
Your best bet is to make your dictionaries match the data. Not sure I
would actually make the fields lenght 999 but instead write a routine
to examine the data and let you know the
my guess is that a numeric of size 999 will barf just as bad and on every value.
simply specify the sql data type as something reasonable like DECIMAL,19,2
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Daniel Perttula
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 6:41
David,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Tod
Sigafoos
Sent: Wednesday, 23 November 2005 16:06
To: Daniel Perttula
Subject: Re: [U2] sql server universe
Daniel,
SQL is pretty insistent on data being what it is defined as
(a feature for some .. a
From: Perry Taylor
What would be the indications/complications of this happening?
No one else can run port.status until the port.status semaphore is
cleared.
A more dangerous similar example is locking the login semaphore.
Logins to UV shell are singlethreaded via this semaphore.
uvlictool
26 matches
Mail list logo
