All,
I'm having a problem with using XML and RedBack together. Has anyone else
experienced this?
I need to generate an XML document that will be returned to a RedBack object in
a single property. The subroutine to build the document uses the UniVerse XDOM
API. When I run this from a test
All
Okay scratch that - I was being dumb.
It does create the XML, it's just the RBO Scope page won't display it because
it's XML.
Duh. Monday morning.
Brian
All,
I'm having a problem with using XML and RedBack together. Has anyone else
experienced this?
I need to generate an XML document
Anita
if the reports are simple, your best route is probably to create the report
using RetrieVe or SQL with the XML modifiers. Then you can capture the XML and
process it in your client.
If you're using Delphi.NET, you can use the UniXML class in UniObjects for
.NET. If using the Win32
I will be out of the office starting 03/05/2007 and will not return until
03/06/2007.
I will not have regular access to e-mail. If this is an EDI related matter,
please forward your message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If this matter is urgent,
please contact the help desk. Thanks.
---
u2-users
Chuck,
Ask and ye shall receive!
As my primary mission was to determine the disparity in dynamic array
processing between Universe and UniData (hardware vs. software), I
really didn't get into the testing for efficiency (although I may work
on that, just out of curiosity and completeness).
I have a REAL strange problem here.
We just went from an old box to new box.
AIX version 5.3
MVEnterprise 4.2
Digi Realport v3.8.7
We went from AIX v5.2 to 5.3
MVEnterprise 4.1 to 4.2
Most everything went painlessly except when we tried to get our Digiports
up. The error we get is as follows:
Hi,
I have a evaluation version of Universe shell.Now, I have nothing at the
client end right now.Is it possible to generate reports at the server.Is
there any way to generate report without generating XML.Can we write a
program to generate report without XML generation .
Thanks and Regards,
It's probably not mventerprise's fault. You need to debug the digiport from
AIX.
Do you have a file /dev/tty82 and does it have read/write permissions for
the user that mventerprise runs as? You probably need to configure the
digiport through smit to get the range of tty numbers that you want.
Is it possible to generate reports at the server.Is there any way to
generate report without generating XML.
Yes, using the query language you can easily generate reports at the
server without XML. Look up the LIST and SORT commands in the query
language documentation, that should get you
Thanks, Drew. My bet's riding on REMOVE.
I hope some have found this information helpful. If I get
the chance, I'll try to do a more thorough testing of the
various dynamic array extraction methods (EXTRACT vs REMOVE,
primarily) on each platform to help identifiy good
programming
Anita
What kind of report?
You can use the LIST and SORT commands in UniVerse, e.g.:
SORT BOOK_TITLES WITH AUTHOR_NAME = Eoin Colfer
You can send this to a system printer bvy adding LPTR:
SORT BOOK_TITLES WITH AUTHOR_NAME = Eoin Colfer LPTR
You can add break point and summary processing:
LOLdon't think I wanna take that bet!
Stevenson, Charles wrote:
Thanks, Drew. My bet's riding on REMOVE.
I hope some have found this information helpful. If I get
the chance, I'll try to do a more thorough testing of the
various dynamic array extraction methods (EXTRACT vs REMOVE,
On Unidata, I saw a Unibasic tips write up from long ago. It said concatenation
was faster than using a -1 to build an array. The speed came from the fact
that Unidata knew where the end of a variable was. So using concatenate, the
process could jump to the end of the variable to add an element
I thought that EXTRACT was not taught anymore
as the nomenclature works as well.
The nomenclature _I_S_ EXTRACT. Or REPLACE, for assignments.
Whenever anyone in this thread or on this list says extract or
replace they are probably thinking of coding it as the syntax
shortcut, rather
I've danced around with this concept and I gotta play the CPU card that so
many people harp on.
Considering that you are using this method because you are appending a vast
amount of data, you are cycling through the FOR...NEXT loop a gazillion
times. Thus, you are processing the statement [EMAIL
Looks like I am losing my last major contract and nothing new is
developing in the MV world locally or telecommute. If you have any
leads you could help keep another disenfranchised MV professional off
the streets... :-)
Take care,
Will
---
u2-users mailing list
Hello,
I'm running a VB read-only application that connects into UniData 6.0.8 on an
IBM AIX 4.3.3, using ODBC.
My problem is that we keep running out of user licenses on UniData.
I have TIMEOUT set in the VOC-LOGIN, but that doesn't seem to effect the ODBC
logins.
Is there a way in UniData
Another method that I use when building a large dynamic array
(assuming that it's going to be written somewhere) is to create a
large DIM variable, say DIM OUT(10) and increment a index pointer.
Then I MATWRITE OUT and be done with it.
Oh dear. If you're building something for output like
I don't get the intent of your 'oh dear' reply.
When I suspect that I will be appending a bunch as in the earlier posts, I
use my DIM method instead of appending to a dynamic array with -1. It's
progress is consistent instead of progressively slower.
Your reply says to use MATREAD?MATWRITE but
Note my exact words:
snip
I thought that EXTRACT was not taught anymore as the nomenclature works
as well...
/snip
I didn't say that the isn't EXTRACT. My statement said that I would doubt
that someone would teach EXTRACT when they should just teach . They may
mention it but not spend any time
As of UniData 6.0 you must use EXTRACT in an I-Descriptor because doesn't
work.
Thanks,
David A. Green
DAG Consulting
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MAJ Programming
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 2:08 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Your reply says to use MATREAD?MATWRITE but the next sentence seems
to the contrary.
My mistake and apologies. I meant OPENSEQ/WRITESEQ/CLOSESEQ.
-Kevin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.PrecisOnline.com
** Check out scheduled Connect! training courses at
http://www.PrecisOnline.com/train.html.
I was wonderin' what you meant! Sequential access *does* still have it's
place in today's random access heavy world.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kevin King
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 14:30
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE:
Yes, the easiest way is to use one of the query languages (UniVerse/SQL or
RetrieVe).
You can use the SETPTR command to designate a printer or disk file to which to
direct the report.
If you want something more than a report that is the output of a query you can
write UniVerse BASIC programs
I was wonderin' what you meant! Sequential access *does* still have
it's place in today's random access heavy world.
Man, I really should have had my coffee before responding to Mark
today. The only thing worse than responding in haste is responding
inaccurately, and even with best intents for
25 matches
Mail list logo
