Re: [U2] Universe 10.1 Itype possible parsing problem

Not to prod an already dead one, but the same problems occur using comparisons on outcomes or '@' items. For example: SOME PROCESS; IF @1= 5... yields an incorrect result by my testing. j On 1/9/08, Jerry Banker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chuck, Thanks for verifying it. Also thanks for letting

RE: [U2] [UD] Cleaning out _PH_

Yes - I could see that the logic of getting the DIR would at least be reduced by the number of records being deleted and already in a list -- I mean, if I'm deleting after 30 days, today I would *know* what records are being deleted for the next 29 days at least. It would make the nightly/daily

RE: [U2] [Ad] XLr8 Editor and Web Developer Updates

Are there any plans to make XLr8 and PRC play nicely together? - John M. Horn HealthLink -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of daverch Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 12:56 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [Ad]

RE: [U2] Universe 10.1 Itype possible parsing problem

More than likely it has a lot to do with using reference variables. Jerry Banker Sr Programmer Analyst IBM Certified Solutions Expert Affiliated Acceptance Corp Sunrise Beach, MO 1-800-233-8483 www.affiliated.org -Original Message- From: john reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

RE: [U2] [Ad] XLr8 Editor and Web Developer Updates

I had a similar thought, I don't want the XLr8 Editor writing directly to the primary source repository. Will it respect the Unix permissions on an item in that Dir? Thanks. Have a great day, -Baker Hughes x3598 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

Re: [U2] [Ad] XLr8 Editor and Web Developer Updates

Hi Baker, The short answer is yes. All we do is a write in either UniVerse or UniData, so if the file in question does not have write permission the item will not write. Regards Kendrew On Jan 10, 2008 9:37 AM, Baker Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had a similar thought, I don't want the

[U2] [UD] IP address in LISTUSERS command

We're allowing external users to access our UD server. When I run a LISTUSERS command I get 46 Demo (0)- LU UDTNO USRNBR UID USRNAME USRTYPE TTYIP-ADDRESSTIME DATE 1 3448 197626 support1 phantom pts/1 Console 23:16:33 Dec 15 2007 2 1808 197712 username1 udt

RE: [U2] [UD] IP address in LISTUSERS command

Bill, Haven't you already asked this question before?? ;-) http://www.nabble.com/UD-IP-Address-tc10993435.html Although, seems your issue wasn't fully responded to... My best guess...you've got U2 device licensing and your local IP address is being returned to the UD server by your device

RE: [U2] [Ad] XLr8 Editor and Web Developer Updates

Does XLR8 use UniObjects for Java as the interface? So whatever UOJ allows...in conjunction with the users' permissions/groups are...for the server - directories, files, etc., etc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kendrew Peacey Sent:

RE: [U2] [UD] IP address in LISTUSERS command

David: Yes I have. I haven't received any ideas. However... It is device licensing on the client. Our UD server doesn't have device licensing. All the external clients use AccuTerm 2K2 IE Edition, configured with no device licensing. However, I use AccuTerm 2K2 with device licensing checked