Something to do with case I believe
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Lunt, Bruce
Sent: 16 February 2011 00:13
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] SOAP in UniBasic
I wrote a program to make a SOAP call for
I am new to the U2 java api. I am trying to make a subroutine call but
get the following Exception. It is not in the documentation and I have
not had a lot of luck tracking it down. I am able to make a simple query
so not sure if there is some configuration or something I am not aware of
which
Make sure that the account you are trying to connect to is in the
UD.ACCOUNT file that resides in the sys account.
Here is what mine looks like.
LIST UD.ACCOUNT F1 F2 F3 09:31:11 Feb 16 2011 1
VOC... F1 F2. F3.
sys/usr/udtho rootud
You get this if the backend dies for whatever reason, permissions, corrupt
files etc...
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Jackson
Sent: 16 February 2011 14:28
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2]
Good Morning,
Looking for opinions and experiences here. We are trying to do some system
cleanups. We found that our PO file has over 10 million records dating back
some 7 years. We've decided that 2 years of PO history is plenty to keep on
file.
Currently there are no indices on this
What about creating a new file first
do a SELECT (not SSELECT) and only write to the new file the ones you want
using a program (still might take a bit).
CNAME the OLD FILE when done
CNAME the NEW file to the original name
Then build any indexs you want on the NEW file
-Original
On 2/16/2011 10:07 AM, Glorfield, Gordon wrote:
Good Morning,
Looking for opinions and experiences here. We are trying to do some system
cleanups. We found that our PO file has over 10 million records dating back
some 7 years. We've decided that 2 years of PO history is plenty to keep on
Is it a distributed file? If so, I'd write a basic program to loop through each
of the parts sequentially (i.e., a basic select), read each record, evaluate
archive or not, readnext. Then, I'd run a few iterations to run in parallel.
You're right about the index overhead. If you had indices,
Sounds like the purge should come first to me - your purge sounds like it will
get rid of most of the records, so the date-based index isn't that helpful for
selecting the old ones, and it will slow down the time it takes to delete each
record.
-Original Message-
From:
Can you run the same subroutine from a Basic Program?
David A. Green
(480) 813-1725
DAG Consulting
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Jackson
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 7:28 AM
To:
Thanks, let me investigates this and see what I find.
On WednesdayF/16/11 9:41 AM, Steve Romanow slestak...@gmail.com wrote:
Make sure that the account you are trying to connect to is in the
UD.ACCOUNT file that resides in the sys account.
Here is what mine looks like.
LIST UD.ACCOUNT F1 F2 F3
In Unidata, the index would be build for the 10 million records. The purge
would run a little longer as the index has be updated with every record
removal. The size of the index file does not shrink with the purge of the
records. From my experience, I would purge the file and then build the
I would SELECT, SAVELIST, GETLIST, COPY to PO.HIST, GETLIST, PURGE PO.
David A. Green
(480) 813-1725
DAG Consulting
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Glorfield, Gordon
Sent: Wednesday, February 16,
Keith Johnson, do you frequent the list?
I have made some Unidata patches to MAKEXML and wondered if you want
these adjustments.
Thanks,
Steve
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
Building the index will take some time. Purging data from the index as you
purge the actual data will also take extra time. The more indexing there is,
the longer it takes to completely file or delete a record.
Purge the data first, then build your index with nothing but clean data.
John
Thanks Jeff. You may get an email from me in the near future.
Norm
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Jeff Powell j...@powellclan.com wrote:
I do a lot with UOJ and I'd be happy to help. Contact me offline if you're
interested.
On 02/15/2011 02:43 PM, Norman Bauer wrote:
ha ha I can see
I agree with the opinions expressed, but wish, as one writer has already,
to stress the *reason*.
Thrashing the disk is a very bad idea. If you want to do any operation
whatsoever, on more than say thirty percent of any file, the best course is to
do that operation in disk order i.e. frame
Does this subroutine do file I/O? Does it explicitly open the file or assume
some other program or subroutine opens it and stores the file variable in
labelled common...? Sometimes it can even be a call subroutine call that is
called using a labelled common variable (CALL @MYSUB)...
Easiest
Just wanted to submit that we found out what the issue was (thanks to
some folks on another users group). Apparently only the DC with the
PDC Emulator FSMO role will work to validate and login users using the
home directory/home account setting. We migrated the FSMO role and it
worked fine.
19 matches
Mail list logo
