Re: [U2] Interesting....

2013-10-03 Thread Ed Clark
My guess would be that it's because the loop was very tight. I've seen lots of instances where tight loops couldn't be interrupted at all. Maybe in this case it wasn't in basic code when it interrupted, and couldn't find any basic code within a few steps, so didn't offer D. On Oct 2, 2013, at

Re: [U2] Interesting....

2013-10-03 Thread George Gallen
Sounds reasonable. George -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Ed Clark Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 8:32 AM To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] Interesting My guess would be that it's because

Re: [U2] Interesting....

2013-10-03 Thread Wjhonson
I don't think this is it. Perhaps George you could post the full code that is the actual issue, not just an example. We could then test it, to see if your symptom can be replicated. However I still don't like Break=Null, that seems wrong to me. It should say Break=Intr -Original

Re: [U2] Interesting....

2013-10-03 Thread George Gallen
I'm fairly confident that the Break= is not applicable to my connection Since it's not a serial connection where a break signal could be sent. The portion that would be applicable is INTR= ^C - which did work, When I hit control C, it interrupted the program. So the interrupt portion Isn't

Re: [U2] Interesting....

2013-10-03 Thread Wjhonson
The portion you posted works perfectly fine on my system. It's quite likely that another portion you didn't post is the problem. The 'D' option can be turned off in a variety of ways. Without having more details its not very easy to find the cause. -Original Message- From: George

Re: [U2] Interesting....

2013-10-03 Thread Wjhonson
If it worked fine for you, then what's the problem? -Original Message- From: George Gallen ggal...@wyanokegroup.com To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Thu, Oct 3, 2013 10:27 am Subject: Re: [U2] Interesting Yes, it worked fine for me as well - which is what

Re: [U2] Interesting....

2013-10-03 Thread George Gallen
Good question... -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Wjhonson Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 1:29 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Interesting If it worked fine for you, then

Re: [U2] Interesting....

2013-10-03 Thread Wjhonson
It's impossible to debug your situation, without more details. The code you posted is NOT the problem. It's elsewhere. To determine where we need to know more details. Sorry, there's just too many ways to turn off the debugger. -Original Message- From: George Gallen

Re: [U2] Interesting....

2013-10-03 Thread George Gallen
I can't really provide any more details. What would be the most common ways to turn off the debugger? By not actually trying... George -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Wjhonson Sent: Thursday,

Re: [U2] Interesting....

2013-10-03 Thread Wjhonson
The command that makes the BASIC program *run* supports an option to turn it off. That's one way out of dozens I'm not going to go through them all here :) -Original Message- From: George Gallen ggal...@wyanokegroup.com To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Thu,

[U2] Missing docs on Transaction Logging

2013-10-03 Thread Wjhonson
From this page http://www.rocketsoftware.com/brand/rocket-u2/technical-documentation/UniVerse-v11.1.11 Select this UniVerse Transaction Logging and Recovery and you will get the error Unable to retrieve document By the way it says to contact the webmaster and yet there does not appear to be

Re: [U2] Interesting....

2013-10-03 Thread Wjhonson
oops the compiler... not the run engine -Original Message- From: Wjhonson wjhon...@aol.com To: u2-users u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Thu, Oct 3, 2013 10:54 am Subject: Re: [U2] Interesting The command that makes the BASIC program *run* supports an option to turn it

Re: [U2] Interesting....

2013-10-03 Thread George Gallen
Well that one is an obvious no - since the debugger works at the input statement in that program, But wasn't working when it was stuck in the loop. That is what I meant by by not actually trying - if it's a method that is intentional to turn Off the debugger, then that is not the cause -

Re: [U2] Interesting....

2013-10-03 Thread Wjhonson
The only way to help you debug this, is with the full scope of the Area of code What is was, what it is. If you're not willing to show that, there is no way to help you :) -Original Message- From: George Gallen ggal...@wyanokegroup.com To: U2 Users List