My guess would be that it's because the loop was very tight. I've seen lots of 
instances where tight loops couldn't be interrupted at all. Maybe in this case 
it wasn't in basic code when it interrupted, and couldn't find any basic code 
within a few steps, so didn't offer D.

On Oct 2, 2013, at 11:30 PM, George Gallen <ggal...@wyanokegroup.com> wrote:

> Nothing special in the compile. Why would it give the D in one part of the 
> program ,
> but not in another? Just very strange.
> 
> Oh well....guess I'll have to chalk it up the computer having indigestion or 
> something;
> Hopefully it didn't pick up a virus or bug! (I think I found them all now - 
> but you never
> know)
> 
> -----Original Message----- From: Kevin King
> Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 11:13 PM
> To: U2 Users List
> Subject: Re: [U2] Interesting....
> 
> Isn't there something that strips the symbol table during compile? If the
> symbol table were suppressed the D might not appear because it couldn't do
> much anyway, right?
> On Oct 2, 2013 11:53 AM, "George Gallen" <ggal...@wyanokegroup.com> wrote:
> 
>> I Don't know? I never really looked into the PTERM signals.
>> 
>> I would think that is referring to a Break signal vs Control C  (but I
>> don't know)
>> 
>> It's not that the Break is disabled - just the DEBUG option was missing.
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:
>> u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Will Johnson
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 1:51 PM
>> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>> Subject: Re: [U2] Interesting....
>> 
>> Is BREAK=NULL what you expected to see ?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: George Gallen-2 [via U2 (UniVerse & UniData)] <
>> ml-node+s1073795n41901...@n5.nabble.com>
>> To: Will Johnson <wjhon...@aol.com>
>> Sent: Wed, Oct 2, 2013 10:46 am
>> Subject: Re: Interesting....
>> 
>> 
>>        >PTERM DISPLAY  (RUNNING UV 10.0.2)
>> 
>> MODE            EMULATE
>> CC              INTR    = ^C  QUIT    = ^\  SUSP    = OFF DSUSP   = OFF
>>                SWITCH  = OFF ERASE   = ^H  WERASE  = OFF KILL    = ^U
>>                LNEXT   = OFF REPRINT = OFF EOF     = ^D  EOL     = ^@
>>                EOL2    = ^@  FLUSH   = OFF START   = ^Q  STOP    = ^S
>>                LCONT   = ^_  FMC     = ^^  VMC     = ^]  SMC     = ^\
>>                TMC     = ^T  SQLNULL = ^N
>> INPUTCTL        OFF
>> CARRIER         RECEIVE -HANGUP -LOCAL
>> CASE            -UCIN -UCOUT -XCASE -INVERT
>> CRMODE          -INLCR -IGNCR ICRNL ONLCR -OCRNL -ONOCR -ONLRET -CRONLY
>> DELAY           BS0 CR0 FF0 LF0 VT0 TAB0 -FILL
>> ECHO            ECHO ERASE=BSB KILL=LF CTRL -LF
>> HANDSHAKE       XON -ANY -TANDEM -DTR
>> OUTPUT          POST -TILDE -BG CS -EXPAND
>> PROTOCOL        LINE=0 BAUD=9600 DATA=8 STOP=1 NONE DISABLE -STRIP
>> SIGNALS         ENABLE FLUSH BREAK=NULL
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Wjhonson
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 1:23 PM
>> To: [hidden email]
>> Subject: Re: [U2] Interesting....
>> 
>> The INTR.KEY in the VOC is not the only thing controlling breaking
>> behaviour.
>> It specifies the maximum level of ability, not the minimum, it can be
>> overridden.
>> 
>> However, please type PTERM DISPLAY at TCL and post the results for us to
>> review.
>> That is your first step, before we get more technical.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: George Gallen <[hidden email]>
>> To: U2 Users List <[hidden email]>
>> Sent: Wed, Oct 2, 2013 10:20 am
>> Subject: Re: [U2] Interesting....
>> 
>> 
>> Yes...
>> 
>> The only time I've not had the "D" option, is when I break from a VOC
>> Which is expected, since you can't debug a VOC.
>> 
>> So, why would the D option not appear when you break from a basic program?
>> When....it does when you break from an input
>> ........it does when another program is in a loop
>> ........just this program in this loop it did not appear
>> 
>> And it wasn't executing a SELECT that was taking a long time or something,
>> then
>>  That would be like breaking out of a VOC
>> 
>> George
>> _______________________________________________
>> U2-Users mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
>> below:
>> 
>> http://u2-universe-unidata.1073795.n5.nabble.com/Interesting-tp41892p41901.html
>> 
>>                To start a new topic under U2 - Users, email
>> ml-node+s1073795n3...@n5.nabble.com
>>                To unsubscribe from U2 (UniVerse & UniData), click here.
>>                NAML
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://u2-universe-unidata.1073795.n5.nabble.com/Interesting-tp41892p41905.html
>> Sent from the U2 - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> U2-Users mailing list
>> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
>> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
>> _______________________________________________
>> U2-Users mailing list
>> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
>> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users 
> _______________________________________________
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Reply via email to