I realise that this is very likely an old article but the current SATA
drives will
accept the old four pins power plugs etc. (and the new ones) - a brilliant
idea!
Louis
: You'll also need new cables. Some SATA drives use different power cables
and
: all use different signal cables, so you ma
ehalf Of Glen B
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 11:55
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [OT?] SATA vs SCSI drives
This totally depends on the chipset manufacturer. A $50 Adaptec SATA card
isn't going to burn a hole in the case. Our Opteron
file-server box is running a 320GB
2005 1:59 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [OT?] SATA vs SCSI drives
No, SATA is closer to IDE than SCSI.
Google for scsi versus sata, or scsi vs sata
http://www.infotech.com/ITA/Issues/20050426/Articles/Cut%20Through%20the
%20SAS%20vs,-d-,%20SATA%20Debate.aspx
Might be en
running $400-$600.
Glen
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Claus Derlien
> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 4:54 AM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: RE: [U2] [OT?] SATA vs SCSI drives
>
>
> first of all,
re
> certain to embrace the higher data speeds and installation simplicity
> offered by SATA technology. You can stay abreast of the latest SATA
> developments at www.serialata.org. For more information on upgrading, see
> the "Upgrading Your Hard Drive" section of our cover story of
section of our cover story of March 11,
"Speed Up Your PC."
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ross Ferris
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 18:48
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] [OT?] SATA vs SCSI drives
Somewhat off top
st regards from Denmark
Claus Derlien
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ross Ferris
> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 3:48 AM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: [U2] [OT?] SATA vs SCSI drives
>
>
> Somew
Ross,
Ross Ferris wrote:
Somewhat off topic I know, but does anyone have any definitive
information re these 2 technologies?
Traditionally I've always used SCSI drives, as many years ago we
discovered that although the specs if EIDE looked good on paper, in
practice they were sub-optimal.
I
Somewhat off topic I know, but does anyone have any definitive
information re these 2 technologies?
Traditionally I've always used SCSI drives, as many years ago we
discovered that although the specs if EIDE looked good on paper, in
practice they were sub-optimal.
Whilst I could do my own tests (
