Re[2]: [U2] Basic statement

2006-03-22 Thread David Tod Sigafoos
Visage Better by Design! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry Rogen Sent: Wednesday, 22 March 2006 4:34 AM To: Stevenson, Charles Cc: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Basic statement Buy that man a drink

RE: [U2] Basic statement

2006-03-22 Thread Eric Armstrong
] Basic statement Buy that man a drink Chocolate Milk is my vice of choice. Hershey's powder - NOT Nestle's Quik - in whole milk (OK, yeah, HalfHalf, but I'm trying to cut back.) - that is exactly what it was. There was an $Include that contained an equate statement that equated

[U2] Basic statement

2006-03-21 Thread Barry Rogen
To all, We have 'new' programs from a package I need now support. There is a Basic statement that I have never seen in my 20+ years. Hopefully, one can shed a little light for me... CALL.TRANS.WRITE.SUB (that's a dot tween CALL and TRANS not a space) I search everywhere for it

RE: [U2] Basic statement

2006-03-21 Thread colin.alfke
Are you sure it's not meant to go through a pre-compiler? Hth Colin Alfke Calgary Canada -Original Message- From: Barry Rogen To all, We have 'new' programs from a package I need now support. There is a Basic statement that I have never seen in my 20+ years. Hopefully,

Re: [U2] Basic statement

2006-03-21 Thread Richard Brown
:55 AM Subject: [U2] Basic statement To all, We have 'new' programs from a package I need now support. There is a Basic statement that I have never seen in my 20+ years. Hopefully, one can shed a little light for me... CALL.TRANS.WRITE.SUB (that's a dot tween CALL and TRANS

RE: [U2] Basic statement

2006-03-21 Thread Mark Eastwood
Maybe it's an Address, is there a GOSUB CALL.TRANS.WRITE.SUB anywhere? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry Rogen Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 8:55 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Basic statement To all

Re: [U2] Basic statement

2006-03-21 Thread will
Possibly a label? Will Williams, American COMPUTER TECHNICS, INC. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you sure it's not meant to go through a pre-compiler? Hth Colin Alfke Calgary Canada -Original Message- From: Barry Rogen To all, We have 'new' programs from a package

Re: [U2] Basic statement

2006-03-21 Thread Geoffrey Mitchell
My guess would be that it is a literal equate. Search through the includes and see if you can find where it is equated. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you sure it's not meant to go through a pre-compiler? Hth Colin Alfke Calgary Canada -Original Message- From: Barry Rogen To

RE: [U2] Basic statement

2006-03-21 Thread Barry Rogen
that knows neither victory nor defeat.t. roosevelt -Original Message- From: Stevenson, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 11:48 AM To: Barry Rogen Subject: RE: [U2] Basic statement ten

RE: [U2] Basic statement

2006-03-21 Thread George Gallen
to be cataloged to point to the location where it is being stored. George -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Eastwood Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 12:13 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Basic statement Maybe it's

RE: [U2] Basic statement

2006-03-21 Thread Stevenson, Charles
Buy that man a drink Chocolate Milk is my vice of choice. Hershey's powder - NOT Nestle's Quik - in whole milk (OK, yeah, HalfHalf, but I'm trying to cut back.) - that is exactly what it was. There was an $Include that contained an equate statement that equated CALL.TRANS.WRITE.SUB

RE: [U2] Basic statement

2006-03-21 Thread Mike Rajkowski
Allen wrote: Who in the world would go to all the trouble of taking a standard command and making it non-standard for no possible purpose other that to obfuscate the program???!!Gaaa! Hopefully no one! But... Since I have not seen the code, I will make the assumption that the

RE: [U2] Basic statement

2006-03-21 Thread Ross Ferris
-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Basic statement Buy that man a drink - that is exactly what it was. There was an $Include that contained an equate statement that equated CALL.TRANS.WRITE.SUB TO 'CALL subroutine' Excellent job Charles and much thanks Barry Rogen PNY

RE: [U2] Basic statement

2006-03-21 Thread Stevenson, Charles
Subject: RE: [U2] Basic statement Buy that man a drink - that is exactly what it was. There was an $Include that contained an equate statement that equated CALL.TRANS.WRITE.SUB TO 'CALL subroutine' [snip] -Original Message- From: Stevenson, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED