Visage Better by Design!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry Rogen
Sent: Wednesday, 22 March 2006 4:34 AM
To: Stevenson, Charles
Cc: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Basic statement
Buy that man a drink
] Basic statement
Buy that man a drink
Chocolate Milk is my vice of choice.
Hershey's powder - NOT Nestle's Quik - in whole milk (OK, yeah,
HalfHalf, but I'm trying to cut back.)
- that is exactly what it was.
There was an $Include that contained an equate statement that
equated
To all,
We have 'new' programs from a package I need now support. There
is
a Basic statement that I have never seen in my 20+ years. Hopefully,
one
can shed a little light for me...
CALL.TRANS.WRITE.SUB (that's a dot tween CALL and TRANS not a space)
I search everywhere for it
Are you sure it's not meant to go through a pre-compiler?
Hth
Colin Alfke
Calgary Canada
-Original Message-
From: Barry Rogen
To all,
We have 'new' programs from a package I need now
support. There is a Basic statement that I have never seen in
my 20+ years. Hopefully,
:55 AM
Subject: [U2] Basic statement
To all,
We have 'new' programs from a package I need now support. There
is
a Basic statement that I have never seen in my 20+ years. Hopefully,
one
can shed a little light for me...
CALL.TRANS.WRITE.SUB (that's a dot tween CALL and TRANS
Maybe it's an Address, is there a GOSUB CALL.TRANS.WRITE.SUB anywhere?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry Rogen
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 8:55 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Basic statement
To all
Possibly a label?
Will Williams,
American COMPUTER TECHNICS, INC.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you sure it's not meant to go through a pre-compiler?
Hth
Colin Alfke
Calgary Canada
-Original Message-
From: Barry Rogen
To all,
We have 'new' programs from a package
My guess would be that it is a literal equate. Search through the
includes and see if you can find where it is equated.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you sure it's not meant to go through a pre-compiler?
Hth
Colin Alfke
Calgary Canada
-Original Message-
From: Barry Rogen
To
that knows neither victory
nor defeat.t. roosevelt
-Original Message-
From: Stevenson, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 11:48 AM
To: Barry Rogen
Subject: RE: [U2] Basic statement
ten
to be cataloged to point to the location where it
is being stored.
George
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Eastwood
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 12:13 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Basic statement
Maybe it's
Buy that man a drink
Chocolate Milk is my vice of choice.
Hershey's powder - NOT Nestle's Quik - in whole milk (OK, yeah,
HalfHalf, but I'm trying to cut back.)
- that is exactly what it was.
There was an $Include that contained an equate statement that
equated CALL.TRANS.WRITE.SUB
Allen wrote:
Who in the world would go to all the trouble of taking a standard
command
and making it non-standard for no possible purpose other that to
obfuscate
the program???!!Gaaa!
Hopefully no one!
But...
Since I have not seen the code, I will make the assumption that the
-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Basic statement
Buy that man a drink - that is exactly what it was.
There was an $Include that contained an equate statement
that equated CALL.TRANS.WRITE.SUB TO 'CALL subroutine'
Excellent job Charles and much thanks
Barry Rogen
PNY
Subject: RE: [U2] Basic statement
Buy that man a drink - that is exactly what it was.
There was an $Include that contained an equate statement
that equated
CALL.TRANS.WRITE.SUB TO 'CALL subroutine'
[snip]
-Original Message-
From: Stevenson, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
14 matches
Mail list logo