RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET - Reference / Experience / Advice

2006-11-28 Thread Stuart . Boydell
e IBM product not in ES it could be worth investigating. Stuart Boydell From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of "Hona, David S" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, 29 November 2006 09:36 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.

RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET - Reference / Experience / Advice

2006-11-28 Thread Hona, David S
, for those that need it. You only need to buy the licenses you require. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen O'Neal Sent: Wednesday, 29 November 2006 1:42 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET -

RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET - Reference / Experience / Advice

2006-11-28 Thread Stuart . Boydell
Just a question. I'm wondering what the IBM UO.Net pooling provides over using MS Enterprise Services pooling with UO.Net? The MS pooling component is built into the Windows OS (Enterprise Services for .Net aka Component Services). The IBM option seems to be expensive as far as licencing goes espec

RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET - Reference / Experience / Advice

2006-11-28 Thread Brian Leach
Stephen Thanks. That's good to know. Brian > > The connection pooling portion of UO.NET has be extremely > tested for one > U2 Channel Partner (what we used to call VARs) that has > approximately 500 end user sites that are up to over 1,000 > users at some locations. This particular Partne

RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET - Reference / Experience / Advice

2006-11-28 Thread Stephen O'Neal
Brian Leach stated "connection pool licensing is a new feature in UniVerse 10.2 - and so I doubt you will find that anyone has had a chance to really prove that part of it yet." The connection pooling portion of UO.NET has be extremely tested for one U2 Channel Partner (what we used to call VARs

RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET - Reference / Experience / Advice

2006-11-28 Thread Brian Leach
Ray I have used UO.NET for WinForms development and found it to be fast and stable : just as its predecessor (UniObjects) has always been. I used UniObject (uvObjects) since it first came out for all kinds of "heavy data" applications - from 4GLs to reporting tools - and have never been disappoint

Re: [U2] UniObjects for .NET - Reference / Experience / Advice

2006-11-27 Thread jpb
Since when has anything on windows been long term :-) - Original Message - From: "Ray Methvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 12:25 PM Subject: [U2] UniObjects for .NET - Reference / Experience / Advice I received the following inquiry from an end user and w

RE: [U2] UniObjects for .Net 2.0

2006-03-08 Thread Victor St Clair
Yes. We are using UO.NET (from UniData 7.1) with C# and ASP.NET on the 2.0 .Net framework. So far we haven't noticed any problems that are specific to version 2.0 in regards to UO.NET. Victor St. Clair -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf O

Re: [U2] UniObjects for .NET

2005-08-18 Thread Don Kibbey
Just install the "uniobjects" SDK off the client cd. Once you do that, uniobjects will be in the c:\ibm\uniDK\uonet folder. You must make sure that you have a version of UniVerse that includes the .Net version. I think that was 10X and above. On 8/18/05, Chuck Mongiovi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET

2005-08-18 Thread Anthony Caufield
I believe its on the 10.1.11 Client CD iginal Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck Mongiovi Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 6:41 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] UniObjects for .NET Does anyone know where the SDK for UniObjects for .NE

RE: Unclassified RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET)

2004-08-06 Thread Veenhof, Peter
I have heard from IBM that connection pooling is there, they are just working out licensing issues. Thus, the lack of comment. -Original Message- Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 6:25 AM Subject: Re: Unclassified RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET) > * Connection pooling for UO.

Re: Unclassified RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET)

2004-08-06 Thread Simon Lewington
Mike The presentation point... > * Connection pooling for UO.NET provides good scalability sounds like it could be sales guys and tech guys not talking properly. Maybe the engineer said that dot net has object pooling built in, and the presentation morphed that to UO.NET having connection pooli

RE: Unclassified RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET)

2004-08-05 Thread Anthony Corrente
[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simon Lewington > Sent: Thursday, 5 August 2004 20:12 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Unclassified RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET) > > "HENDERSON MICHAEL MR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in messa

RE: Unclassified RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET)

2004-08-05 Thread HENDERSON MICHAEL MR
ifth points, but does not seem to mention the second and fourth at all. Hope this clarifies my point. Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simon Lewington Sent: Thursday, 5 August 2004 20:12 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Uncl

Re: Unclassified RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET)

2004-08-05 Thread Simon Lewington
"HENDERSON MICHAEL MR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Great stuff, but reading it I'm a little disappointed that there is no > mention of Connection Pooling. One of the previously advertised > benefits of UO.NET was that it would include a connection pooling > mech

Unclassified RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET)

2004-08-04 Thread HENDERSON MICHAEL MR
here else? Any ideas? Regards Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Corrente Sent: Wednesday, 4 August 2004 13:36 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET) Hi all, I'm a little confused... does t

Re: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET)

2004-08-04 Thread Simon Lewington
As well as saying that UD 6.1 is required, the manual says at one point... "Note: Compression is not available when connecting to servers running a version of UniVerse earlier than Release 9.5." Does this suggest that this the unirpc server stuff is unchanged and so UO.NET will actually work with

RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET)

2004-08-04 Thread Rajesh Menon
What about uniVerse (with UO.NET) release date? Thanks Rajesh -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leroy Dreyfuss Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 4:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET) >I hope someb

RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET)

2004-08-03 Thread Anthony Corrente
ates for UO.NET here. > Otherwise wait until September :-) > > -Rajesh > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno > Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 3:03 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [U2] UniObjects

RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET)

2004-08-03 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
>I hope somebody from IBM-U2 will post some release dates for UO.NET here. >Otherwise wait until September :-) The date is in the link that is part of the message you replied to. Regards, LeRoy F. Dreyfuss Advanced Technical Services - U2 Technology Analyst IBM U2 Data Management Solutions Tel

Re: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET)

2004-08-03 Thread Ralph Melia
UO.net will be included in the release of UD 6.1, which is due Aug. 10. - Original Message - From: "Rajesh Menon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 7:22 PM Subject: RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET) > I hope someb

RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET)

2004-08-03 Thread Rajesh Menon
: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET) >From the text on the website and the conference info below I don't see how UO.NET is similar or different compared to UO except that it's re-written to be managed code. Does it support the full UO API? Does it support ADO.NET? Connection pooling i

RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET)

2004-08-03 Thread Tony Gravagno
>From the text on the website and the conference info below I don't see how UO.NET is similar or different compared to UO except that it's re-written to be managed code. Does it support the full UO API? Does it support ADO.NET? Connection pooling is interesting. XML/DataSet support? I hope that

Unclassified RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET)

2004-08-02 Thread HENDERSON MICHAEL MR
Of Ross Ferris Sent: Tuesday, 3 August 2004 16:10 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET) Perhaps the clue is that this document says the general availability date is 10th August, not 31st July ?? Ross Ferris Stamina Software Visage  an Evolution in Software Developm

Re: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET)

2004-08-02 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
MAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 04:31 pm Subject: Re: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET) > Look at this url in the Interoperability section. > > "The new UniObjects for .NET provides high-speed > native access that runs in a managed .NET environment > for increa

RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET)

2004-08-02 Thread Ross Ferris
f Of u2ug >Sent: Tuesday, 3 August 2004 12:36 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET) > >ok - but where is it ? > > >- Original Message - >From: "Ron White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent

Re: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET)

2004-08-02 Thread u2ug
ok - but where is it ? - Original Message - From: "Ron White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 04:31 pm Subject: Re: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET) > Look at this url in the Interoperability section. > > "

Re: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET)

2004-08-02 Thread Ron White
From: "George Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 10:51 AM Subject: RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET) > I went to the website for Unidata 6.1 but no mention of UO.NET. > Anyone know where to go for info. > > Thanks

RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET)

2004-08-02 Thread George Smith
I went to the website for Unidata 6.1 but no mention of UO.NET. Anyone know where to go for info. Thanks grs -Original Message- From: Rajesh Menon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 4:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET) Not sure

RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET (UO.NET)

2004-07-30 Thread Rajesh Menon
. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simon Lewington Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 1:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [U2] UniObjects for .NET Anyone have any further info on this. It's 30/07/04 today. "Kishor Parmar" <[EMAIL PR

Re: [U2] UniObjects for .NET

2004-07-30 Thread Simon Lewington
Anyone have any further info on this. It's 30/07/04 today. "Kishor Parmar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Yahoo, > Does it have a .net data provider for using ADO .net ? > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET

2004-07-16 Thread James Canale, Jr.
Yes, UO.NET becomes a fully managed assembly. It will make deployment a bit easier because there is a .msm merge module. If you should/shouldn't hold off depends on what is important to you. I like not having to register com objects, need another separate install procedure, etc., but you might n

RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET

2004-07-16 Thread James Canale, Jr.
>>Does it have a .net data provider for using ADO .net ? Not that I see in the beta documentation. It may not matter that much depending on exactly what you want to do. It is really easy to get U2 data and easily put it into an ADO.NET dataset (especially if you use the U2 XML support - ~6 line

RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET

2004-07-16 Thread Peter Gonzalez
It's not available till 7/30. Here is the link, but has no mention of the beta version. http://www.ibm.com/isource/cgi-bin/goto?on=IMNL704J02 I received the monthly newsletter form IBM. Subject: DB2 Information Management Software Today newsletter At 11:39 AM 7/16/2004 -0400, you wrote: >D

RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET

2004-07-16 Thread Peter Gonzalez
DOn't know. There is no additional info. At 03:32 PM 7/16/2004 +0100, you wrote: >Yahoo, >Does it have a .net data provider for using ADO .net ? > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Gonzalez >Sent: 16 July 2004 14:13 >To: [EMAIL PRO

RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET

2004-07-16 Thread Donald Kibbey
Does it have a web link where we can obtain it ! Don Kibbey Financial Systems Manager Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] UniObjects for .NET

2004-07-16 Thread Kishor Parmar
Yahoo, Does it have a .net data provider for using ADO .net ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Gonzalez Sent: 16 July 2004 14:13 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] UniObjects for .NET UniObjects for .NET it's finally here! It's als