RE: [U2] UniObjects.NET speed/performance - PERFORMANCE SURVEY

2004-11-10 Thread Chris Ahchay
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Tabor Sent: 05 November 2004 19:05 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] UniObjects.NET speed/performance - PERFORMANCE SURVEY *** Now you've got me wondering... *** We're considering moving from UO to UO.NET due to a considerable

RE: [U2] UniObjects.NET speed/performance - PERFORMANCE SURVEY

2004-11-05 Thread George Smith
On my test system the connection is slow but after that I feel it is just fine. grs -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Tabor Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 1:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] UniObjects.NET speed/performance

RE: [U2] UniObjects.NET speed/performance - PERFORMANCE SURVEY

2004-11-05 Thread Adrian Matthews
] UniObjects.NET speed/performance - PERFORMANCE SURVEY *** Now you've got me wondering... *** We're considering moving from UO to UO.NET due to a considerable amount of our non-MV programming is in VB.NET anyway. I'm getting the feeling that UO.NET is generally slow, but then remembered

RE: [U2] UniObjects.NET speed/performance - PERFORMANCE SURVEY

2004-11-05 Thread Harry Hambrick
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] UniObjects.NET speed/performance - PERFORMANCE SURVEY *** Now you've got me wondering... *** We're considering moving from UO to UO.NET due to a considerable amount of our non-MV programming is in VB.NET anyway. I'm getting the feeling that UO.NET is generally