To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] uvo.net UvBasic .Net
I whole heartedly agree. The green screen is the crusher for our
environment.
As far as .Net and Visual Studio go, I don't think it takes even that
much
effort as having Pick Basic as .Net assemblies to modernize or help
PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lettau, Jeff
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 7:53 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] uvo.net UvBasic .Net
From what we have experienced here, the addition of .NET applications on
top of Unidata that replace existing green screen functions is not a
benefit. Depending
PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lettau, Jeff
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 7:53 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] uvo.net http://uvo.net UvBasic .Net
From what we have experienced here, the addition of .NET applications on
top of Unidata that replace existing green screen functions
I'm always appalled at what seems to be the general consensus around
here that a GUI interface and fast, efficient, effective data entry are
mutually exclusive.
Colin what the HE - double-hockey sticks is going on here Alfke
Calgary, Canada
-Original Message-
From: Don Kibbey
If you
John,
Or look at Delphi, which supports .net from release 7 and forward.
VB.net has much more in common with Delphi than with VB6. And moving
from VB6 to Delphi is less culture shock than VB6 to VB.net.
- Chuck
David Jordan wrote:
If you are looking to move from VB6 because Microsoft
For many of the reasons others have mentioned, I chose to make the leap from
vb6 to c# some time ago. Conversion of a vb6 app to .net can be a tedious
exercise. I chose to just rewrite it in c# and take that opportunity to
learn a new language and clean up some of my previous features.
If you
The concept of having Basic.Net assembly language is one I am interested in
too. One could write the business rules in PICK Basic in a class and use VB
or C# to develop the GUIs. Best of Both Worlds.
I don't believe it is too complex; one of the open source PICK developers
may be able to adapt
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Jordan
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:01 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] uvo.net UvBasic .Net
The concept of having Basic.Net assembly language is one I am interested in
too. One could write
David Jordan wrote:
The concept of having Basic.Net assembly language is one I am interested in
too. One could write the business rules in PICK Basic in a class and use VB
or C# to develop the GUIs. Best of Both Worlds.
I don't believe it is too complex; one of the open source PICK developers
Isn't Universe/Unidata still using a runtime interpreter instead of
generating assembler code?
David Jordan wrote:
The concept of having Basic.Net assembly language is one I am interested in
too. One could write the business rules in PICK Basic in a class and use VB
or C# to develop the GUIs.
U2 are 'semi-compiling' like pascal and java...
That is the source code is parsed and transformed to a low level
- easely parsed - language that is interpreted at run time.
-- mats
Roger Glenfield wrote:
Isn't Universe/Unidata still using a runtime interpreter instead of
generating assembler
I thought the OC.O was short for Orange County at the Ocean.
-Original Message-
From: Mats Carlid [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:55 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] uvo.net UvBasic .Net
U2 are 'semi-compiling' like
Sounds like exactly what you can do now with Redback. The product gives
you
total flexibility on how much logic is U2 and how much is in .Net.You
can have all your business logic as U2 methods, all in .Net using U2 as
simply a datastore, or anything in between.
Mike Randall
The
I whole heartedly agree. The green screen is the crusher for our
environment.
As far as .Net and Visual Studio go, I don't think it takes even that much
effort as having Pick Basic as .Net assemblies to modernize or help
perception, although that would be terrific. What would be great is
Mike, I'm confused about your Maybe one day it happens comment right
after you refer to our ability to do this with existing tools. Yes,
PDP.NET does allow you to directly bind a data source to data aware
components. It's one of those demo tricks that you can do in a
presentation but it's seldom
Seems to work...
Mind you I still recommend writing code in subroutines first and then
calling it, rather than using the other objects, other than for smaller
uses. It is so much easier to QA as you can test the routines on the server
first, write test scripts and see any error messages
to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and thereafter, destroy the
electronic message immediately.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Harbeson
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 8:11 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org; U2-Users (E-mail)
Subject: RE: [U2
] On Behalf Of George Smith
Sent: 27 April 2005 14:20
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] uvo.net
I have not been able to find out how to do the SELECT FILE WITH BLA BLA
BLA. I wonder if it is possible with the uvo.net ?. You are right we need
it.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Leach
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 9:05 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] uvo.net
George,
You just use a command with a selectlist, sort of as you would at TCL.
The UniSession CreateUniSelectList provides access to the regular
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Kibbey
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 11:11 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] uvo.net
Forget VB.Net http://VB.Net and embrace the mighty semi-colon! C# is
great
for access via uniobjects to UniVerse. Here's a snippet
@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] uvo.net
No. I'm comfortable in VB.NET.
They (IBM) should have FINISHED the documentation.
The Docs exist for the COM version
Marc Harbeson
ERP/Systems Administrator
Brinly Hardy Company
O - (812) 218-7206
F - (812) 218-6084
[EMAIL PROTECTED
PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 2:06 AM
Subject: RE: [U2] uvo.net
No. I'm comfortable in VB.NET.
They (IBM) should have FINISHED the documentation.
The Docs exist for the COM version
Marc Harbeson
ERP/Systems Administrator
Brinly Hardy Company
O - (812) 218
Kent
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 7:14 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] uvo.net
Is there any advantage of using C# to VB seeing that microsoft seem to be
committed to supporting both.
I should imagine its going to be easier to convert legacy vb to vb.net
rather than vb to c
yea...
some vb.net sample code sure would have helped. only samples are in c#
was not any good c# samples on how to execute a SELECT FILE WITH BLA BLA
BLA also... just a generic SELECT ENTIRE FILE sample. (which is useless)
Otherwise once you get used to how its re-wired I think
I'm sure I found a bunch of vb.net examples on IBM's support site. I haven't
had a chance to look at them yet. I ran across them looking for something else
and downloaded them as I can never seem to find things again.
I might have been in my support rather than techconnect.
hth
Colin Alfke
25 matches
Mail list logo
