The command string is simulating the keys you would enter if you were to do
the same manually via the menus, this depends on the version of viaduct you
are using as these changed over the years.
008 PRINT PCMCD:KEY /O /P ALT+FE:DOSPATH:CRUPLOAD.FILECR#CR1
2CROCRCRALT:ENDCMD:
If you use the alt
Anmol,
Are both of the processes UniVerse processes, or is one of them an external
process (script, executable etc.)?
If the latter, some contention at the OS level is probably inevitable, with
the other (non-UV) process having the file open. Whenever I have had that
combination, I always use a
We use UNFORM, a great tool for designing forms and report layouts and
integrates with email, pdf, postscript (via ghostscript) etc. Very
affordable and runs on UNIX, Linux and Windows in a client/server setup
Ian Stuart
Cordes, Tom (contractor) wrote:
TEST
-Original Message-
Depending on your basictype, you'd be wanting either READLIST or READSELECT.
READLIST dyn.array.var [FROM list.num] {THEN statements [END] | ELSE
statements [END]}
Synonym
READSELECT (BASICTYPE P only)
--
Dave Walker
8..7 4(()) -::-
-::-8.74 .74(())
How about COPY-LIST?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Walker
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 8:33 AM
To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
Subject: RE: [U2] What is the opposite of FORM.LIST? (uv10)
Depending on your basictype, you'd be
not basic, but Universe command.
for instance..
I can enter
FORM.LIST SOMEFILE SOMEITEM
3 record(s) selected to SELECT list #0.
WHATCOMMAND SOMEFILE SOMEITEM ???
Do I use to write that select list back to a TYPE 30 file.
SAVE-LIST filename Itemname only works with Type 1 and Type 19
that assumes the list is already in SAVEDLISTS I wanted to avoid
that step (saving the list to SAVEDLISTS.
ED VOC COPY.LIST
4 lines long.
: P
0001: PQ
0002: HCOPYI FROM SAVEDLISTS TO I2,ENTER DESTINATION FILE
0003: H I3,ENTER LIST ID,ENTER LIST ID
0004: P
and...It doesn't have an
Will,
There is a very good use for REMOVE. Consider a cross-reference item
(inherited, not built by current programmer) which has many thousands of keys
and
IDs. You could select the IDs and READNEXT or REMOVE to process. Either is far
faster than FOR/NEXT and extract. I've seen a 40
A known cause of UV error 040019 (my guess for Anmol is
Variation-on-the-Theme #2):
When processA is holding the update lock on a record,
and processB issues a WRITE to that record,
then processB will wait for the lock for 20 minutes (non-configurable),
then abort or take ON ERROR clause with
Aaah! REMOVE or not to REMOVE.
REMOVE has three other associated statements that make the set a very
powerful and distinct statement set indeed.
REMOVE has REVREMOVE and GETREM and SETREM.
The only gotcha I fell into many years ago was upon seeing a statement
that read...
VAR = VAR
I
In a message dated 7/20/2005 5:41:57 AM Pacific Daylight Time, writes:
I tried using SAVE-LIST FILENAME ITEMNAME but it doesn't seem to work,
the FILENAME in question is a type 30, and the help page
says it needs
to be a type 1 or 19.
Is there a way to get this to work on a
In a message dated 7/20/2005 6:40:38 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You could select the IDs and READNEXT or REMOVE to process. Either is far
faster than FOR/NEXT and extract. I've seen a 40 minute process reduced to 6
seconds (thanks Louis Nardozi) by changing to
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have yet to hear of a good, legitimate, use for REMOVE.
Even after 30 or so posts on this topic ;)
Consider associated multi-value arrays, perhaps for automobiles, shall we
say? And for some reason, you need to look at each and every car. So,
(coding from memory
From: George Gallen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks like I'll be making a VOC to do the save/copy, only problem
is I need to put in all the accounts that I want to use it in.
Consider a system VOCLIB with remote pointers to the items from the
accounts that use them. That way if you have to tweak the
I'll jump in with a good, legitimate REMOVE usage.
Most of what we hear about is something like:
IF (LONG.DELIMITED.STRING[1,1] NE ) THEN
LOOP
REMOVE ELEMENT FROM LONG.DELIMITED.STRING SETTING MORE.DATA
* Take Element-specific action
WHILE
Jerry,
I alwys like this sort of a protection against overwriting:
100BASE.ID = 'ZZZ' : '.' : DATE() : '.' : TIME() : '.'
101DONE = FALSE
102TIEBREAKER = 1
103LOOP
104 READU DUMMY FROM BASE.FILE, BASE.ID : TIEBREAKER LOCKED
105
As long as you keep an open mind so that when the perfect situation for
REMOVE comes up you will use it. :-)
And if that perfect situation comes up, and if you allow yourself to code
it, let us know.
Bruce
Bruce M Neylon
Health Care Management Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL
George,
It should be there, but it ain't.
But for this one it is easier to roll your own verb, than any other
course of action.
Just flesh out the following with error handling, @SYSTEM.RETURN.CODE,
and maybe a get(arg.) for FROM [listno] for numbered select lists,
@SYSTEM.RE
CT CDS.BP
It can actually be done without the loop. Simply increment a unique
sequential number for every record written so that the key has at
least a time and the sequential number. If multiple records come
through in the same second, they'll have a different sequential number
and will still be unique.
The original poster said he didn't think using the time as the key would be
the cause of the problem I just wanted to point out that it could unless he
made sure that the key was indeed unique.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Trevor
Ockenden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
So Will please be open minded as to the need and merits of all
statements as they are only unreadable to the uninitiated.
Like, for example, Will's stating that REMOVE is obscure and WHILE
READNEXT is clear ...
I've been
All,
Let's move this to u2-community.
If you aren't subscribed to U2-Community, please visit
http://listserver.u2ug.org/, enter your e-mail address, and 'browse all'
lists to maintain your access. Post all future messages on this topic
there.
- Charles Barouch
Moderator
Is there a UniQuery equivalent to the SQL GROUP BY clause?
I've tried SSELECT with UNIQUE but it saves only one attribute and then
I cannot subsequently list other attributes.
UniData version 5.2
UniObjects for Java
Web Servlet application.
Regards.
---
u2-users mailing list
What are you trying to do exactly? What's the data look like and how
do you want it presented? Usually you can do a BREAK.ON with ID.SUPP
and DET.SUPP (alternatively (ID) and get summary reporting out of
UniQuery.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Will wrote...
I have yet to hear of a good, legitimate, use for REMOVE.
OK! Good point Will.
Try coding a routine like sdiff that you can find in some flavours of
Unix in UVBasic with and without the REMOVE set of statements and see
the difference it makes to the speed. This task was greatly
Kevin,
I have a file that has every product category attributes for: product
line, product description (16,736 of these), major product group, major
group description (133 of these). I want just the major group data from
that without any duplicates. It going into a drop menu for the user to
Is there an option to uvbackup (without the uvadm gui) to direct output to
disk instead of tape?
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Sounds like Prelude. You sure this information isn't normalized into
some other file? Seems like an aweful lot of work to scan 16K+
records to fill a drop-down list.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Powell
Sent: Wednesday, July 20,
Yes, -t
HELP uvbackup tells you all about the -t option:
|-t Specifies the device to which to write backup
|
| data. device can be either a pathname or an entry
|
| in the DEVICE file. Use multiple -t options to
|
| specify up
Thanks, Dave. This is on AIX 5.2.
Specifically, we have a solution that does an rsync from a remote backup
server. But this is unaware of locks, updates, etc. I'd like to shoot an
image of uvbackup to a spot on disk, then export that for the enterprise
backup.
Our greatest duty in this
You would think... but, no. By device or pathname, it seems to want a
tape drive. I set up an DEVICE item, but still to no avail.
Yes, -t
HELP uvbackup tells you all about the -t option:
|-t Specifies the device to which to write backup
|
| data. device can
Dan,
I use the following command to create .BAK files from uvbackup:
uvbackup -f -b 1024 -l backup set label -s uvbackup.log -cmdfil
files.cmdfil -notag backupset.bak
Hope this helps,
Jay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Fitzgerald
32 matches
Mail list logo
