Tony you are of course quite correct.
We are all different, - my point in the argument i think is that if we take
this to the extreme then we, end up at the lowest common denominator which
is not what we want to do. So we have to draw a line somewhere and my idea
of where to draw that line is
And remember, at the more recent UniData/UniVerse, this use of sockets will
require a 'real' seat license -- it will make a 'phantom' (free) into an
iPhantom (licensed)
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf
Symeon, and others,
How does a multi-threading strategy relate to the use of a multi-core,
multi-cpu and/or clustered hardware server configuration using various
operating systems and multi-value databases in terms of performance and
thruput? (A complete answer gets you an honorary PhD in
In a message dated 3/7/2011 1:24:14 AM Pacific Standard Time,
syme...@gmail.com writes:
Therefore i
suggest we agree on the highest common denominator which is so long as
code
is efficient then it does not matter how complex it looks at first glance
and therefore such discussion of if x
Dave,
That's a complex answer and you can't really answer it properly in a forum
for such a broad range of setups. I'll try to answer as generically as
possible focusing on O/S and CPU threading specifically. Please correct me
if I'm wrong here.
You don't really need multiple processors to
I'm going to go Contrarian:
It does not relate.
Dave Taylor wrote:
Symeon, and others,
How does a multi-threading strategy relate to the use of a multi-core,
multi-cpu and/or clustered hardware server configuration using various
operating systems and multi-value databases in terms of
;)
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of fft2...@aol.com
Sent: 07 March 2011 16:52
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] [OT] Coding and brain chemistry
In a message dated 3/7/2011 1:24:14 AM Pacific Standard
From: Symeon Breen
...you are consuming a socket service, and not
accepting connections, - we do this kind of thing all
the time using phantoms.
Lets say your batch of transactions is in a file...
I agree with Symeon, phantoms are probably your answer. While I
haven't benchmarked a
On 07/03/11 09:16, Symeon Breen wrote:
Lets say your batch of transactions is in a file, as you process each one
set a flag saying it is done, or delete the record or something, then
yourprogram can select the file, loop through the records and if the flag is
set or the record does not exist
Folks,
I have recently started getting email from
postmas...@u2marketplace.com about the 'U2 Market Place'. It also
features Return-Path: u2...@mercury.serverphase.com.
Whilst it looks like it might be kosher, I'm a little intrigued as to
where they got my email address from. The address they use
Don't know anything about u2marketplace.com -- looks to be brand new with
basically empty forums, etc. but serverphase.com is a hosting company. They are
legit, but I suspect their only connection is they are being paid to host
u2marketplace...
Robert F. Porter, MCSE, CCNA, ZCE, OCP-Java
If you look at the 'about' as I recall it shows Jay LaBonte as the 'man
behind the curtain' (or did when I looked a while back). He's been in the
U2 space for a while...
DW
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On
I'd agree with this approach...I've used it many times before...
A good well thought out design well help you...design first: code second :-)
I've in the past done the following:
- control program to configure, start/monitor/stop phantom processes
- I find writing a phantom process which logs
13 matches
Mail list logo
