Re: [U2] Virtual OS environment for UV
Hello, We use VMWare to set different kind of OS (win2k, Xp, Linux) and then setup different Environment UV/UD/D3 on different releases (server client) Really powerfull flexible. Manu - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 8:11 AM Subject: [U2] Virtual OS environment for UV I'm interested to know if anyone is using virtual environments to run UV - eg Virtual PC under Win or LPAR under Aix etc. We are thinking that this may be a good way to effectively replicate the live environment for development, testing and training. If so, what has your experience been? Are there licencing issues for UV? Regards, Stuart ** This email message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of addressed recipient(s). If you have received this email in error please notify the Spotless IS Support Centre (61 3 9269 7555) immediately who will advise further action. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses. ** --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: Re: [U2] Virtual OS environment for UV
Stuart, No - though I wouldn't expect issues other than memory consumption and CPU bashing. Remember that each VPC is reserves the full amount of memory you allocate to that machine, so you will need plenty to spare. Also remember that Microsoft counts VPCs as a platform, so if you are running Windows you need a valid a Windows licence for each one. You might find the best way would be an MSDN subscription, that includes VPC and sufficient Windows licences along with all other goodies. Depends whether you do Windows development as well. Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 30.06.2005, 04:14:50: This sounds good. Do you run multiple instances of UV simultaneously? Any issues there? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Stuart, I run everything under Virtual PC, including UniVerse. This allows me to take simple spot saves, and to move my entire working environment between PCs without worrying about hardware differences: something I have had to do several times in the past. I also keep clean images zipped that include personal editions of each of the databases so I can unzip them for installation testing. Saves a huge amount of time. Brian ** This email message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of addressed recipient(s). If you have received this email in error please notify the Spotless IS Support Centre (61 3 9269 7555) immediately who will advise further action. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses. ** --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Unidata and MQ series
unidata 6.0 ON AIX --- Craig Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John, The UniBasic Extensions guide says you need to run the script makeu2mqs to enable WebSphere MQ support. I do this and it errors xlc: not found. xlc is the IBM C compiler. Is my only option to buy and install the C compiler? which release of U2 on which architecture? regards, Craig --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] Universe
What is the TCL command for showing current Universe config. I cant seem to recall I don't do it all the time. Thanks in advance. Tony --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Universe
CONFIG ALL -Original Message- From: Anthony Caufield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 11:36 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Universe What is the TCL command for showing current Universe config. I cant seem to recall I don't do it all the time. Thanks in advance. Tony --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Universe
Logto to uv account and type config without quotes. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Caufield Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 10:36 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Universe What is the TCL command for showing current Universe config. I cant seem to recall I don't do it all the time. Thanks in advance. Tony --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Universe config etc.
You might also find this useful: .L RELLEVEL -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hennessey, Mark F. Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 9:43 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Universe CONFIG ALL -Original Message- From: Anthony Caufield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 11:36 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Universe What is the TCL command for showing current Universe config. I cant seem to recall I don't do it all the time. Thanks in advance. Tony --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Universe
Do you mean the command CONFIG -Dianne Anthony Caufield wrote: What is the TCL command for showing current Universe config. I cant seem to recall I don't do it all the time. Thanks in advance. Tony --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] [UV] RH Linux
On our Sun Solaris the UV administrator was uv and belonged to the sys group. I tried entering this on our new RH Linux system and logging in but it will not allow me to do any of the administrator functions. It tells me I have to be a super user. Do I have to log in as root (or su) to administer UV now? Jerry Banker --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] RH Linux
Pretty much -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jerry Banker Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 3:52 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [UV] RH Linux On our Sun Solaris the UV administrator was uv and belonged to the sys group. I tried entering this on our new RH Linux system and logging in but it will not allow me to do any of the administrator functions. It tells me I have to be a super user. Do I have to log in as root (or su) to administer UV now? Jerry Banker --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] - Determining time sequence
My only issue with using UUID's is the fact that they weren't DESIGNED for time sequencing, and you could run foul of the implementation. I just ran a quick test, fired off 4 phantoms and another screen based process to get 5,000 sequential ID's - they all finished in under a second, so 25,000+tps seems AOK ... if the item IS in contention, it will be in cache, so in practice I don't think this should be an issue. Phil was originally concerned about this being a bottleneck - my (limited) testing leads me to believe this will not be the case the god news is that he now has multiple alternatives to trial. Ross Ferris Stamina Software Visage - an Evolution in Software Development -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 30 June 2005 12:15 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] - Determining time sequence Ross, I'm not derogating the use of sequential IDs but IIRC, the bloke had a reason not to use a sequential id counter and wanted an alternative. The uuid spec states that uuid should cater for time adjustments on the local clock, hence, shouldn't be vulnerable (Of course, in the real world, that depends on how the spec has been implimented). The uuid can be sequentialised and can gauranteed to be unique to a high degree of certainty in time and space. There are no locking or contention issues when a uuid is generated opposed to a heavily used key generator. I stand by my assertion that a uuid is a viable and justifiable solution in the original posters problem space. ;-) Cheers, Stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - This would still make things vulnerable whenever date/time changed on the generating machine the beauty of the sequential ID is that fact that nit WILL be in real time order, regardless of what people do with dae time of the machine ** This email message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of addressed recipient(s). If you have received this email in error please notify the Spotless IS Support Centre (61 3 9269 7555) immediately who will advise further action. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses. ** --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Unidata and MQ series
John, in the work subdirectory of ud60 is a file called u2mqseries.mk. This sets CC=xlc for the build. I have used gcc succesfully when recompiling UniVerse. You can download it from IBM here http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/aix/products/aixos/linux/ or as a smit installable package from here http://www.bullfreeware.com/ Setting CC=gcc may then work. HTH, Craig --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] - Determining time sequence
Goo'day, Ross...At 08:50 01/07/05 +1000, you wrote: the god news is that he now has multiple alternatives to trial. Probably have to wait until Eastergrin Ross Ferris Stamina Software Visage - an Evolution in Software Development -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 30 June 2005 12:15 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] - Determining time sequence Ross, I'm not derogating the use of sequential IDs but IIRC, the bloke had a reason not to use a sequential id counter and wanted an alternative. The uuid spec states that uuid should cater for time adjustments on the local clock, hence, shouldn't be vulnerable (Of course, in the real world, that depends on how the spec has been implimented). The uuid can be sequentialised and can gauranteed to be unique to a high degree of certainty in time and space. There are no locking or contention issues when a uuid is generated opposed to a heavily used key generator. I stand by my assertion that a uuid is a viable and justifiable solution in the original posters problem space. ;-) Cheers, Stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - This would still make things vulnerable whenever date/time changed on the generating machine the beauty of the sequential ID is that fact that nit WILL be in real time order, regardless of what people do with dae time of the machine ** This email message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of addressed recipient(s). If you have received this email in error please notify the Spotless IS Support Centre (61 3 9269 7555) immediately who will advise further action. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses. ** --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.7/34 - Release Date: 29/06/05 -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.7/34 - Release Date: 29/06/05 Regards, Bruce Nichol Talon Computer Services ALBURYNSW 2640 Australia http://www.taloncs.com.au Tel: +61 (0)411149636 Fax: +61 (0)260232119 If it ain't broke, fix it till it is! -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.7/34 - Release Date: 29/06/05 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] - Determining time sequence {Unclassified}
Ross, -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ross Ferris Sent: Friday, 1 July 2005 10:51 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] - Determining time sequence My only issue with using UUID's is the fact that they weren't DESIGNED for time sequencing, and you could run foul of the implementation. I just ran a quick test, fired off 4 phantoms and another screen based process to get 5,000 sequential ID's - they all finished in under a second, so 25,000+tps seems AOK ... if the item IS in contention, it will be in cache, so in practice I don't think this should be an issue. The scenario where it does become an issue is where you have transactions that run for a long (relatively) time. This means that although you have the capacity to increment the counter quickly, you can't actually do it because the update lock on the incrementing counter has to be held for the entire length of the transaction. I don't actually see how having the counter automagically maintained by the DBMS would help. For example, suppose that Transaction A starts and gets counter 654321123 Transaction B starts and gets counter 654321124 Transaction C starts and gets counter 654321125 Transaction D starts and gets counter 654321126 Now suppose that transaction B fails ... Surely transactions C D have to be rolled back because they now have the 'wrong' counter value? I don't see this as being any advance over the UV mechanism, except that it's less coding at the application level. Regards Mike Phil was originally concerned about this being a bottleneck - my (limited) testing leads me to believe this will not be the case The good news is that he now has multiple alternatives to trial. Ross Ferris Stamina Software Visage - an Evolution in Software Development The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence Force. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or distribute this message or the information in it. If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone the sender immediately. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Universe
CONFIG { ALL | DATA }from any account - the remainder from the UV account
only
ANALYZE.SHM -c also from O/S as analyze.shm -c or smat -c what is in
uvconfig
ANALYZE.SHM -t also from O/S as analyze.shm -t or smat -t what is in
.uvconfig (therefore in memory)
ANALYZE.SHM -t0 also from O/S as analyze.shm -t0 or smat -t0 same as -t
but no * on non-default values
ED UFD uvconfig
CT UFD uvconfig
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] vmuvadm.exe
Where exactly is the vmuvadm.exe executable? What version of UV for Windows do you see this on? I'm currently looking at UV 10.1.10 on Windows and I don't see a vmuvadm.exe Thanks! -Original Message- From: Key Ally [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 9:03 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] vmuvadm.exe All, UniVerse on Windows ships with vmuvadm.exe, a utility for launching a number of UniVerse configuration tools. I think the Unix/Linux versions of UniVerse have the same tool, but I don't recall it's name. - Chuck Same Name on Linux, Unix, and Windows Barouch --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] high IO
Dear All, Is it possible to have any command to know which users UniVerse process that causing a hugh IO ? coz sometimes (not everyday)the Universe server is very slow. when i iostat, realize some I/O is 100%. We closely monitor the file size in system to ensure no overflow. network is healthy. some user is access the UniVerse server thru application using uvobject or ODBC like datastage , excel file. Will this causing high IO ? i use top as well to check what are the top 10 users is doing but still no idea how to find out the causing 0.00.00.00.0 0.0 0.00.00.0 0 0 c7t0d6 0.00.00.00.0 57.5 20.00.00.0 100 100 c7t0d0 0.00.00.00.0 27.8 3.00.00.0 100 100 c7t0d0s0 0.00.00.00.0 10.0 5.00.00.0 100 100 c7t0d0s1 0.00.00.00.0 0.0 0.00.00.0 0 0 c7t0d0s2 0.00.00.00.0 11.0 10.00.00.0 100 100 c7t0d0s3 0.00.00.00.0 8.7 2.00.00.0 100 100 c7t0d0s4 TIA Regards DISCLAIMER:- This email is confidential and intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may contain information that is privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by return email or telephone and destroy the original message. Thank you. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] vmuvadm.exe
...\UVAdmin\vmuvadm.exe In PE 10.0 Mike Pflugfelder wrote: Where exactly is the vmuvadm.exe executable? What version of UV for Windows do you see this on? I'm currently looking at UV 10.1.10 on Windows and I don't see a vmuvadm.exe --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] - Determining time sequence {Unclassified}
So you don't get the counter until you are about to complete the
transaction . timing issue would be the same with any other
technique.
Anyway, don't want to beat a dead horse - no more from me
Ross Ferris
Stamina Software
Visage - an Evolution in Software Development
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of HENDERSON MIKE, MR
Sent: Friday, 1 July 2005 9:52 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] - Determining time sequence {Unclassified}
Ross,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ross Ferris
Sent: Friday, 1 July 2005 10:51
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] - Determining time sequence
My only issue with using UUID's is the fact that they weren't
DESIGNED
for time sequencing, and you could run foul of the implementation.
I just ran a quick test, fired off 4 phantoms and another screen
based
process to get 5,000 sequential ID's - they all finished in under a
second, so 25,000+tps seems AOK ... if the item IS in contention, it
will be in cache, so in practice I don't think this should be an
issue.
The scenario where it does become an issue is where you have
transactions
that run for a long (relatively) time. This means that although you
have
the capacity to increment the counter quickly, you can't actually do it
because the update lock on the incrementing counter has to be held for
the
entire length of the transaction.
I don't actually see how having the counter automagically maintained by
the DBMS would help. For example, suppose that
Transaction A starts and gets counter 654321123
Transaction B starts and gets counter 654321124
Transaction C starts and gets counter 654321125
Transaction D starts and gets counter 654321126
Now suppose that transaction B fails ...
Surely transactions C D have to be rolled back because
they
now have the 'wrong' counter value?
I don't see this as being any advance over the UV mechanism, except
that
it's less coding at the application level.
Regards
Mike
Phil was originally concerned about this being a bottleneck - my
(limited) testing leads me to believe this will not be the
case The good news is that he now has multiple alternatives to
trial.
Ross Ferris
Stamina Software
Visage - an Evolution in Software Development
The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended
for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not
necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence
Force.
If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy
or
distribute this message or the information in it.
If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone
the sender immediately.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
