I will be out of the office starting 11/02/2006 and will not return until
06/03/2006.
For IT Related questions and problems, please contact Nicholas Preller -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
I've noticed a number of people bemoaning the fact that the archive
server does not appear to available. If you wish, you can use
http://news.gmane.org to search there as an alternative.
Select gmane.comp.db.u2.general as the group to either read or search
and away you go. You can also search for
The problem with NT backup is that it will skip files that are
open. So if you have people logged in or jobs running, the files
will be skipped. I believe I have seen VOC's skipped (and maybe
other files) for no apparent reason either.
See some of the posts here.
http://www.mail-archive.com
As someone that had their hard drive slammed by a hard error on the boot
sector on Friday the 13th of last year, I can attest that NTBACKUP works
great at restores, as long as you have a windows system to boot off of. The
old chicken and the egg thing. Fortunately I had an emergency hard drive
th
As an aside, what does one do when rebuilding a machine from one of these
backups?
1) reinstall windows
2) reinstall UD into the previous UDTHOME directory
3) drag'n drop the old directory structure into UDTHOME
and everything works, all accounts now exist? This is definitely cool.
Bill
> --
We have a need to upgrade a Universe 9.3 system to 10.1.x. Does anyone have
any experience with jumping directly from 9.3 to 10.1x. Are there any know
problems with doing this, does anyone have any war stories they want to
share about this upgrade?
Thanks for you help
Tom Dodds
[EMAIL PR
Ref: Universe/NT Ver. 10.x.
Several months ago we were faced with forms and reports where the data that
should have printed at the bottom of the page was pushed over to the top of
the next page.
We issued SETPTR commands to equate both top and bottom margins = 0 on both
print channel 0 and the p
Try building an index on the whole filed and using a RANGE selection ...
i.e. >= and <=
Let us know how it goes - it may do the job. Remember to use no.dups and
no.nulls for a bit more pep
(pattern matches can't use the index)
Regards
JayJay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PR
Question:
Are you running from crontab as root perchance - and using uv foreground
tasks not PHANTOMS - also is it AIX?
Regards
JayJay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Kent
Sent: 09 February 2006 23:05
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.or
Ken:
Thank you very muchntbackup, here I come. :-)
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Wallis
> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 8:31 PM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: RE: [U2] [UD] backups
>
> Bill Has
My pet peeve with Universe Indexes is in selecting multiple values of an
indexed field
The following select might take 10 minutes
SELECT CONTRACT WITH I_CONTRACT = "50178227" "50092158" "50006089"
"50178228" "50092159" "50006090" "50178229" "50092160" "50006091"
"50178230"
Whereas SELECT CONTRA
Out of interest, how long does the selection take without the index?
Regards,
Rob Wills
(rob dot wills at tigerinfotech dot com)
Martin Philips wrote on 10/02/2006 14:04:26:
> Given the number of records that you say are in the file, you are
probably
> going to visit most groups anyway so the
but the question was referring to a gosub not a call,
so the control should (big should) be contained within
one program.
The only time I used the call @varible was when I had
different subroutines based on the flavor of the system
This way it I had one base program that could be modified
that whe
> On a more serious note...If this is done correctly,
> I don't think it
> would be very difficult at all to support.
If someone who didn't design the system has to
maintain it, it is difficult to find out which
programs are impacted by a change into one of the
subroutines.
In normal calls, one c
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Serguei
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 4:18 AM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] GOSUB variable-name?
>
>
> This approach is absolutely awful from software design point
> of
My experience is with UniVerse but I suspect it would suffer from the
same thing. It's likely the problem is the high number of records per
customer number. You might try indexing the entire key then doing a
select on the customer number portion. Something like this maybe (not
sure of the UniDat
> Selecting other indexed values in the same file which gives me 5 records
out
> of the 5 million is very very fast.
30 second certainly sounds excessive but an index entry leading to over
500,000 records is not a good idea. To be effective, an index needs to lead
you to a very small proportion of
Hi there,
we are having very slow respone times on a select statement. We have a file
with a total of 5 million records in where the key is like -nn. The
first part() is a customer number(numeric) and the second part(nn) is
a sequential no. We have created an i-descriptor on the cus
This approach is absolutely awful from software design point of view. I
personally would hate to have to support software when it is the calling
program that decides the flow of the program that is been called.
Do you really need this?
- Original Message -
From: "Barry Brevik" <[EMAIL PRO
19 matches
Mail list logo
