This is starting to sound like a case that needs to be logged with IBM - We
know IBM people watch the list, and the fact no one has chimed in after all
this time tells me there's probably more to your issue - it's not going to
be a UserList fix, sorry to say! Hopefully the customer has a 'paid in
81009 is rpc failed. This can happen for a number of reasons, it could be
network related, it could be the data server timing out your connection.
A few points to look at / questions
Is this ud or uv ?
Does it take a fair amount of time to happen ? - what are your timeout
settings for
IF statements don't work in my paragraphs any more. They worked yesterday.
No upgrades or changes that I know of.
LOGIN.TEST
Your 'VOC' has been modified to use long file names.
Illegal IF statement.
Illegal IF statement.
CT VOC LOGIN.TEST
LOGIN.TEST
0001 PA
0002 PTERM CASE NOINVERT
0003
Thanks Symeon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Symeon Breen
Sent: June 5, 2008 11:15 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] UniObjects 81009 error
81009 is rpc failed. This can happen for a number of reasons, it could
be
Louie -
I noticed that you have included a LONGNAMES ON statement in this login test.
LONGNAMES ON should only be run once in each account, not repeatedly.
I don't know if that is your problem, but it might be.
Ken
At 09:59 AM 6/5/2008, you wrote:
IF statements don't work in my paragraphs any
Yeah, I've hoping Wally might chime in, but...
This is really a deal breaker right now, and it's giving us a black eye that
we can't seem to fix whatever this is.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 5:26 AM, David Wolverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is starting to sound like a case that needs to be
I commented out that LOGNAMES line, logged out, and in, and ran LOGIN.TEST
again, and it still gives me an Illegal IF statement. error message.
I'm also finding dictionary I-TYPES not working today that worked yesterday:
LIST REPORTS START.DATE UD.TODAY WITH START.DATE = UD.TODAY
Bad data = for
I found the problem. Somebody had deleted the = VOC record.
ED =
Unable to open =, not a file in VOC.
I restored it from EQ.
-- Louie
CT VOC =EQ
=
0001 K
0002 4
EQ
0001 K
0002 4
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit
On Line 6 don't you need to go to a label to execute a command instead of
trying to directly execute it?
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 09:59:00 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Universe: IF statements in parargraphs don't work anymore
IF statements
We had something similar happen once - check if the VOC entery for TERM
has been changed.
-Dianne
At 09:59 AM 6/5/2008, you wrote:
IF statements don't work in my paragraphs any more. They worked
yesterday.
No upgrades or changes that I know of.
LOGIN.TEST
Your 'VOC' has been modified to
Thanks! Good to know.
Nancy Fisher
Peninsula Truck Lines, Inc
Auburn, Washington
253/929-2040
Visit our Website www.peninsulatruck.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Louie Bergsagel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 12:56
No, that works fine. You only need a label if you want to skip some lines.
Turns out somebody had deleted the VOC equal sign record =.
Which brings up a good security question, how do you prevent someone from
deleting things? Put shell around ED and DELETE?
It would be a bummer to have to make
Kevin King wrote:
Yeah, I've hoping Wally might chime in, but...
This is really a deal breaker right now, and it's giving us a black eye
that
we can't seem to fix whatever this is.
__
I'm really not the best U2 support resource to deal with ODBC issues.
You really
Has anything happened that may have wreaked havoc with your Pick
flavor?
Karen Bessel
Software Developer
Tyler Technologies, Inc.
6500 International Parkway, Suite 2000
Plano, TX 75093
Phone: 972.713.3770 ext:6227
Fax: 972.713.3777
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.tylertech.com
I don't think this is relevant, but I'll throw it out there as a
longshot
We had a problem with JDBC where we would get memory leaks if we didn't
close our Statements. Closing the connection wasn't enough (in most
databases, closing the connection implicitly closes the statements).
The
The program? What program? We sure could use one.
-- Louie Bergsagel
North Coast Electric
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Irina Lissok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi everyone,
We have the program which runs and creates separate excel files for
relational data.
---
u2-users mailing
I had a problem like this once when thee software on each end
implemented threads differently. One was expecting Apartment threading
and the other was expecting something else... I think it was coclass
inits. I don't know if that applies here, but it sounds real similar.
- Chuck
Kevin King
This is just a wild thought as I do not know the details of what you are
doing.
Maybe look at a transaction process around the routine, where you set the
transaction level to the lowest. When operating in ODBC you need to deal
with RDBMS logic more that U2 for file processing.
To get a clean
See also:
www.nebula-rnd.com/products/xlite.htm
hth
Colin Alfke
Calgary Canada From: louiebergsagel The program? What program? We sure
could use one. -- Louie Bergsagel North Coast Electric On Tue, Jun 3,
2008 at 1:33 PM, Irina Lissok wrote: Hi everyone, We have the
program which runs
19 matches
Mail list logo
