RE: [U2] Universe Triggers

I think the purpose of the trigger is to capture all non-application changes. You can't by-pass the trigger easily, unless of course you disable it entirely. It has the advantage of being largely transparent (if written correctly, of course)...regards of where the file is accessed from. It has

RE: [U2] Universe Triggers

There is still a hole to the wrapper approach. Assuming you are trying to catch folks that use the ED (or AE) command, we have to assume that these folks have access to TCL. If you can get to TCL, and you are wanting to hide your tracks, you could still copy your record to a dir file, then

RE: [U2] Universe Triggers

Yep - pretty much. 1 - Globally cattledog the subprograms - otherwise it could crash your update 2- If the subs change - recattledog them and they will reflect the change immediately. I'll see if I can put an eg up on the wiki tomorrow. Stuart Boydell -Original Message- Are you saying

[U2] [UV] using distributed files with multi level data files possible?

Running Universe 10.0.17 on Windows Server 2003 32bit: Can I create a distributed file for a data file that is part of shared dictionary (ie a multi-level data file)? I can't seem to get the syntax right. Here is the scenario. We have a large stock file with current transactions called

RE: [U2] Universe Triggers

Don't forget Remote Verbs (aka Security Subroutines). The combination of triggers and remote verbs is pretty robust, but not rock solid if someone has access to the REAL O/S outside a database shell (for DIR files anyway). Regards JayJay -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [U2][UV] EQUATEs Using System Delmiiters

This makes very good sense to use EQU TO and EQU LIT. The technique is considered pretty standard in other languages which have specific constant macro constructs. There are also very good semantic and source quality imperatives to use this type of technique. Cheers, Stuart Boydell

RE: [U2] [UV] using distributed files with multi level data files possible? {unclassified}

Troy, You _can_ use 64-bit files on 32-bit Windows 2003 Server, NTFS is quite happy with files over 2GB. I would describe multi-level files as an 'old' way of getting some of the same functionality as you get with UV Distributed files. You could have STOCK,HIST1 and STOCK,HIST2 ... if you

RE: [U2] [UV] using distributed files with multi level data files possible?

I'd do something like this paragraph (not tested...) but it should create the parts and update them to all point to the same dictionary. 0001 PA 0002 CREATE.FILE DICT TEST.SHARED.DICT 3 0003 CREATE.FILE DATA TEST.P01 DYNAMIC 0004 CREATE.FILE DATA TEST.P02 DYNAMIC 0005 0006 DISPLAY UPDATING