Henry,
Yes, I did some more testing myself last night, should have replied sooner. I
built a file with a million records and repeated the test, I also created an
I-Descriptor on the dictionary and got the following results :-
COUNT TESTFILE WITH F1 = v
Elapsed 2.828 CPU 2.171
COUNT TESTFILE
nice idea,
In our case, we would also have to build a cross reference to all the
'F' VOC's whose actual filenames are different from their ID's, since
we have a lot of longer filenames with truncated unix filenames.
Or is there a system cross reference file already setup we could tap.
George
Tony G wrote:
I concur with Glen's assessment that some of these services can
be unstable. Not long after writing NebulaShip
(nospamNebula-RnD.com/products/ship.htm) I realized that even
though the product was stable that we might be getting emergency
calls when services were down. I stopped
One more thing that we do. We build a database of our indexes every
night using a 'cron'. It does a
find / \( -name 'idx001' -o -name 'X_*' \) at a UNIX level.
UV's SET.INDEX INFORM acting on an active select list of F- Q-pointers
will give you somethiong similar.
Contrary to syntax listed in
This cries for a ICONV / OCONV code:
George Gallen wrote:
In our case, we would also have to build a cross reference to all the
'F' VOC's whose actual filenames are different from their ID's, since
we have a lot of longer filenames with truncated unix filenames.
Or is there a system cross
Thank you to all. I think Henry insight, supported by others is the
core of what I was looking for. I appreciate all input frm all parties.
Barry Rogen
PNY Technologies, Inc.
Senior Programmer/Analyst
(973) 515 - 9700 ext 5327
bro...@pny.com
These are really annoying when you go to recover data from a tar'd
tape. Not realizing, you xvf the actual name, only to realize a
an hour later, you didn't use the truncated 'real' name it's stored
under the backup as!!
George
-Original Message-
From:
I know the question was about UPS WorldShip. However, suffer the some of the
same
problems no matter what carrier package we implemented. Finally, we went with a
third party package (http://www.bestwaytech.com/proship/). It allows us to ship
package UPS/FEDEX/USPS thru the same xml interface.
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-
boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Support
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 2:28 PM
To: 'U2 Users List'
Subject: Re: [U2] ODBC to UPS WorldShip
I know the question was about UPS WorldShip.