If he changed "SELECT" to "select", would that get him the results he wants?
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Wally Terhune
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 5:10 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Sel
that's what I remember from so long ago I don't want to admit.
BobW
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of John Varney
Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2012 7:59 AM
To: 'U2 Users List'
Subject: Re:
"The only winning move is. Not to play!"
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2011 5:57 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata 7.1
ault, without a "TO" clause, it's select list
0. Personally, I like the equate option suggested but myself, I'd just use
the actual constant numbers since equates and variables are a lot more
typing and don't REALLY add anything to readability or documentat
ultiple stages, the
time would obviously be able to be shorter. As to what the exact amount of
time would be, I'd find someone who hasn't seen your process, time them,
then probably double, or even triple, the time they need to complete the
task.
Just some thoughts that come to mind.
B
open.
Thanks everyone for your insights!
BobW
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Wols Lists
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 2:31 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Simple FMT question
On
