Sorry if I'm late with this comment but I'm a digester (sounds like
something I'd use on the farm!) - so even by responding to the last comment
in yesterdays digest, the topic will have moved on/died by the time this
gets posted - so I'll just say what I did to control the Uv Schema
integrity.
1.
I have not posted for a while as I too have become a bit platform
independent for financial reasons, but I trully hope that Rocket puts some
fuel in the tank.
I've worked in acquisitions for many years and I'm sceptical regarding
Rockets motives, but the first thing that's needed is a Statement
There are a few UK Times 250 companies that use Uv. Having just been made
redundant by one of them -PHS Group (Business Services). I know that William
Hill (Bookmaker) is a Uv ( Redback) user, as is Travis Perkins (Builders
Merchants), and Wolseley Group (Plumb Centres).
Some well known Ud users
I've lost touch with Keith over the years, when he left my employers (PHS)
and Uv, to move into the Unidata world.
He contracted with Smiths Industries (UK), then Sony (Amsterdam), then
blank! Similar story with Geoff. Last whereabouts of both were near M4
corridor between Swindon London.
Not
Looks like my South Wales employer has decided to clear our the old dros.
Most of my colleagues have moved onto SQL/Vb and I've been part of the
rear-guard.
With 17 years Pick development a new challenge is sought.
Data System Analysis Design, PM experience Corporate Acquisitions (78
so far) a
FWIW,
Although in theory this technique may logically access multiple dictionary
items for every record read, and potentially worse, if other records are
accessed by some foreign key, in practice there is so much cache memory
floating around in a commercial (and even home based) system, that the