Re: [U2] UniVerse Add-ins for Visual Studio
Hi Adrian This is a separate product that you have to purchase. Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Halid Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 7:39 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] UniVerse Add-ins for Visual Studio UniData and UniVerse Add-ins for Visual Studio (U2.NET) http://www.rocketsoftware.com/u2/products/u2-net/ Where can I download these addins for Visual Studio 2008/2005? Are they included in the UniVerse Client CD? Regards, Adrian Halid Senior Analyst/Programmer IT Vision Australia Pty Ltd (ABN: 34 309 336 904) PO Box 881, Canning Bridge WA 6153 Level 3, Kirin Centre, 15 Ogilvie Road, Applecross, WA, 6153 P: (08) 9315 7000 F: (08) 9315 7088 E: adrian.ha...@itvision.com.au W: http://www.itvision.com.au ___ NOTICE : This e-mail and any attachments are intended for the addressee(s) only and may contain confidential or privileged material. Any unauthorised review, use, alteration, disclosure or distribution of this e-mail (including any attachments) by an unintended recipient is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender as soon as possible by return e-mail and then delete both messages. ___ ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] U2 is now Rocket U2
Pick Systems actually had RD over in Russia 10 years ago, not sure if that is still the case ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] UniObject .NET Session and Common Block Bug
Hi Adrian If you are using connection pooling, I believe the session would not drop. Regards David Jordan ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] UniObject .NET Session and Common Block Bug
Hi Adrian I don't have problem with named commons. There is a problem if you update the parameters in a named common and you do not compile all the subroutines with the named common. If you call a routine that has not been recompiled you get a fatal, named common mismatch. Is that a possible issue for you. This is a general basic issue and is not an issue with .Net API. Regards David Jordan ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
[U2] U2U is still on in Sydney and there is a special offer on
U2 University is still on in Sydney. MBS is organizing a special offer to make it even more affordable and it is a great opportunity to hear the positive benefits of the Rocket acquisition and the future development of U2. MBS have been looking at ways to help reduce the investment by each of you for this years U2 University. MBS has structured a deal which is dependent on volume, therefore the more of you that register through MBS the greater the cost saving. At this stage, the maximum cost to you would be $1,285 ex GST, representing a $67 saving on the early bird special. Should you wish to participate in this special offer, please send a purchase order marked to the attention of Linda Parkinson with the number of registrations and attendee contact details. Email: linda.parkin...@mbs.net.au or Fax: +613 9571 3222. Upon receiving all registrations MBS will provide an invoice to you reflecting your attendees and the final discount level that we were able to achieve. This offer expires at midday on the 15th October, 2009. Regards David Jordan ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] U2U is still on in Sydney and there is a special offer on
Hi Kate 17 - 19 November 2009 Topics Roadmap with Examples - U2 Data Servers UniData Process Roadmap with Examples - U2 Tools Preparing UniData/UniVerse Files for Relational Access UO.NET for compact frameworks All About UniVerse Files (tutorial) Seamless Application Development with U2.NET A New Look into UniVerse Files Optimization IBM.NET - Overview of IBM Entity Framework for U2 Data Server UniVerse Processes Building and Deploying Visual Studio Tools for Office (VSTO) application Technical Support Tools for UniVerse Database Diagnostics Automatic Data Encryption (ADE) U2 Web DE 5.0. Architecture, Logging and Monitoring Implementation Planning for data-at-rest encryption Bringing you RBOs to .NET Integrating with Cognos Lite More Dynamic, Feature-rich and User friendly Web Introduction to DataStage U2 Sites using AJAX and DHTML Getting the Most from U2 and Java Easy-to-Develop Web Service and 2+ Ways to Consume it Standards and Regulations Web Services: Introduction to Web Services Development and Demonstrations in Different Environments Quench your Xmal thirst with KaXAML Using wintegratae to integrate U2 with Windows Applications and 3rd Party Devices Extending Xadmin - see the new Eclipse-based Integrating Custom Controls into SB/XA Interface for administering UniData Social Media and U2 UXML - four-hour tutorial covering all aspects of U2 XML Technical Support Tools for UniData Database Diagnostics U2 XML - User-Scenario-based Solutions by Example Certification preparation for UniData Admin Regards David Jordan ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] Connection Pooling Statement
IBM accepts this with the ODBC license. You have the option of login process query and logout, or remain logged in with connection pooling but share a pool of licenses. The same with their web services. It is concurrent licensing, which is the number of licenses logged on at any one time. If someone manipulates the process, where 10 users remain logged on at the same time but only use one license, then it is a breach. Licensing is complicated. If people have alternative suggestions, put it forward and build a business case. If it is a legitimate process, U2 will seriously consider it. Under Rocket, it will probably be easier than under IBM. ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] Connection Pooling Statement from a different perspective
Hi Bill I raised that there are 2 options, per user or per processor. For a web site you would select the per processor model. I was generalizing licenses and was trying to point out that licensing is complex for all platforms and costs are not always as cheap as they may seem. There are gotchas in all databases that many users are not aware of. I am aware that there is a clampdown by database providers who are facing a sales slump and are going through checking people have legitimately used their licenses and they are finding breaches. IBM's audit of U2 licenses related to pooling would have coincided with audit checks of other IBM databases. One vendors license agreement allows the vendor to walk into sites for inspections and audits are at the clients costs. There are suppliers who believe they are losing up to 30% of their revenue to breaches of licenses so this is not a minor issue to them. However the main point I was raising was that we needed to find a middle position on pooling where both IBM and the customer were getting a fair price for license use. What have people done to raise the problems with licensing at IBM. We have a user group and the Better and Better site. If there is a better alternative to licensing for pooling, then let us put a business case together and present it rather than just complaining. U2 does not want to lose sites to another vendor because the licensing model does not work. I know that the issues of SAAS has been raised with IBM and if my memory serves me correct, I believe that IBM realised there was a problem and suggested that such situations should be discussed with them to find a solution. Regards David Jordan ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] Connection Pooling Statement from a different perspective
We as a community want U2 technology to have all the bells and whistles and to market and generally upgrades its game. But many of us want U2 to do it for free. If we don't buy appropriate numbers of licenses, then U2 will not be a viable business proposition to a supplier. As a customer we need to pay a fair price for a fair service. Sure, at the same time we need to encourage U2 to provide a fair service for a fair price and maybe we need to encourage better pricing for U2 Connect. Forget the law for the moment and consider what is fair. For if something is abused, then things will be forced upon us that we may not like. In the RDBMS world the majority do not have concurrent licensing. They have per user which means if you access the system through the web, through the PC and through a phone, that is 3 licenses. If you have a 100 users and connect 3 ways you need 300 licenses. Alternatively they run processor licenses based on the power of the processor. This is getting muddy too particularly with a move to virtual servers. Where the virtual server may only use 2 processors of an 8 processor machine. Is the licensing on the virtual or physical processes. When customer A runs 100 users with 2 licenses, then they undermine it for all the other customers. They have equal customer support to customer B who has 100 licenses, but they only contribute 2% to the RD and support framework that customer B provides. If customer B followed customer A methodology then U2 licenses will drop by 98%, which will be quickly followed by 100% because it is now seen as a declining product. Something is only worth what you pay for it, or the mantra if you pay peanuts you get monkeys. As a community we should look for a better position between the two positions on licensing. Playing devil's advocate David Jordan ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] UV global catalog in Pick flavour
Thanks Josh ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] Universe Telnet service won't start
There use to be a requirement to tick the box to allow the service to interact with the desktop that seemed to resolve a similar issue. Regards David Jordan ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] Web services
Hi Tony The Web Services Developer limits what can be done by programming, which takes away the ability to use facilities such as Microsoft authorization. If the consumer comes through something like excel, it limits programmatically what can be done from the client sides as well. I am seeing if someone has a clever trick to solve these issues that I have not thought of. David Jordan ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: [U2] universe sockets
Hi Doug We designed our software to not be dependent on uniobjects so that we were not locked to one vendor. We created a class that handles the uniobjects items. All selects, reads, writes, calls to subroutines go through the class. If we move from uniobjects to another vendor interface, we change everything in one place. Other vendors, provide something similar to uniobjects so it is not big issue. This is better than reinventing the wheel. If you are setting up the socket interface that allows multiple users to use one universe license, then you require to purchase a universe pool license. IBM is currently doing audits in this area to make sure users are not breaching their license agreement. Regards David Jordan --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] SELECT without
I think its COUNT.SUP Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of rbl000 Sent: Thursday, 11 August 2005 9:50 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] SELECT without You mean something other than HUSH ON followed by the select, etc., followed by HUSH OFF? Sincerely Best Regards, Richard Lewis Sr Programmer/Analyst Nu Skin Enterprises [EMAIL PROTECTED] Barry queried: When executing SELECT from a PA, is there some keyword that will suppress the message n records selected to select list 0. Because if there is, I can't find it. Barry --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ___ No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding. Make My Way your home on the Web - http://www.myway.com --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UVODBC procedure call from VBScript
To return a recordset from a UniBasic subroutine to an ODBC call you need to load data into the @HSTMT variable in the UniVerse Basic Subroutine. Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 27 July 2005 6:31 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] UVODBC procedure call from VBScript Hi all, I'm trying to convert a web app from Sybase to UV. I've been attempting to get a vbscript app to call a subroutine as a stored procedure. I am able to connect to the database using the OLE provider and retrieve recordsets. I'd like to be able to execute stored procs as well. IBM provided me with a VB sample to call a subroutine but I can't seem to implement it in VBScript. I've gone over the docs a million and one times and still can't seem to see what I'm missing. Does anyone have any samples, calling a subroutine through ODBC that would return a rescordset to the script that they would be able to share ? Thanks for any help, Vance Forste --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Problems with ObjectCall
Hi Martin Is objectcall still supported with the new release. Uniobjects were to replace it and I thought objectcall was not going to be continued to be supported in new releases. Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Canty Sent: Monday, 28 February 2005 2:47 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Problems with ObjectCall I have an issue with ObjectCall.. After an upgrade to UniData 6.1.0-32 on hp/ux I'm getting an error when I select a database to connect to call to UniOpen returned nnn - tmpnam() failed Any ideas would be greatfully received.. Martin --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
