ff.
>
> George
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Wjhonson
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 12:42 PM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: Re: [U2] Comparing
--Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Wjhonson
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 12:42 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Comparing Two Dyamic Arrays
I think you missed the point that UV (and it'
ginal Message-
From: Charles Stevenson
To: U2 Users List
Sent: Tue, Jul 24, 2012 6:21 am
Subject: Re: [U2] Comparing Two Dyamic Arrays
Mike meant NES( ), not EQS( ).
nd SUMMATION( ), not SUM( ).
UM( ) won't yield a scalar unless all delimiters are the same.
ResultArray = NES(Arra
ARRAY2 = '11':@VM:'12':@VM:'13':@VM:'20':@VM:'21'
ARRAY3 = EQS(ARRAY1,ARRAY2)
...would assign ARRAY3 to look like:
'1':@VM:'1':@VM:'1':@VM:'1':@VM:'1'
...and:
SUM(ARRAY3)
...would equal 5,
OUNT(ARRAY3, @VM)
Does this make sense? With mixed @AMs & @VMs I suspect one would have
to loop through the result array comparing.
Is UniData different than UniVerse?
Bill
- Original Message -
*From
Subject: Re: [U2] Comparing Two Dyamic Arrays
Does len(array1)=len(array2) ?
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Bill Brutzman
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 4:23 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: [U2] Comparing Two
Does len(array1)=len(array2) ?
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Bill Brutzman
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 4:23 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: [U2] Comparing Two Dyamic Arrays
Begin case
Case
does something different however
-Original Message-
From: Bill Brutzman
To: U2 Users List
Sent: Fri, Jul 20, 2012 5:37 pm
Subject: Re: [U2] Comparing Two Dyamic Arrays
Will;
. Thanks for writing.
. I tried the true and false via the equate statement... and also tried it with
and 0.
itself in right justification mode, but
a normal equate will *not* do the same way
-Original Message-
From: Bill Brutzman
To: U2 Users List
Sent: Fri, Jul 20, 2012 5:37 pm
Subject: Re: [U2] Comparing Two Dyamic Arrays
Will;
. Thanks for writing.
. I tried the true and false via the
users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Wjhonson
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 5:30 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Comparing Two Dyamic Arrays
1) You have not set the values of true and false correctly
2) You are comparing numeric strin
1) You have not set the values of true and false correctly
2) You are comparing numeric strings without normalizing them
-Original Message-
From: Bill Brutzman
To: U2 Users List
Sent: Fri, Jul 20, 2012 1:49 pm
Subject: [U2] Comparing Two Dyamic Arrays
Begin case
Case
Begin case
Case array1 = array2 ; sameThing = true
Case 1; sameThing = false
End case
When I tried to use an equals sign... I did not get the right answer.
While the COMPARE function works ok... and I presume that it is a compiler
thing...
It
12 matches
Mail list logo