Re: [U2] Performance reports on 4 Terabyte files vs Distributed Files

2009-07-23 Thread Baker Hughes
Thanks Ross and Tony for your insights. -Baker This communication, its contents and any file attachments transmitted with it are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential proprietary information. Access by any other party without the express written permission of the

Re: [U2] Performance reports on 4 Terabyte files vs Distributed Files

2009-07-23 Thread Symeon Breen
Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Ross Ferris Sent: 23 July 2009 02:53 To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] Performance reports on 4 Terabyte files vs Distributed Files G'day Baker, Just thinking in the sandbox

[U2] Performance reports on 4 Terabyte files vs Distributed Files

2009-07-22 Thread Baker Hughes
Does anyone have any real life examples of performance gains from converting your large file to 64 bit files? Does anyone have a performance comparison of 64 bit files vs. distributed files. I wonder if a 4 terabyte file responds better/faster than a distributed/part file? SELECTs, WRITES,

Re: [U2] Performance reports on 4 Terabyte files vs Distributed Files

2009-07-22 Thread Tony G
From: Baker Hughes Does anyone have any real life examples of performance gains from converting your large file to 64 bit files? Does anyone have a performance comparison of 64 bit files vs. distributed files. I wonder if a 4 terabyte file responds better/faster than a

Re: [U2] Performance reports on 4 Terabyte files vs Distributed Files

2009-07-22 Thread Ross Ferris
! -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users- boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Baker Hughes Sent: Thursday, 23 July 2009 2:01 AM To: 'U2 Users List' Subject: [U2] Performance reports on 4 Terabyte files vs Distributed Files Does anyone have any