Re: [U2] UD: Replication

You may find the following IBM.com entitled article useful (180 page guide). UniData Data Replication Operations Guide - v1.1 and v2.1 Also, the minimum UniData Windows release I would recommend for Replication is 7.1.9. The current 7.1.12 release is even better.

RE: [U2] UD: Replication

: Re: [U2] UD: Replication You may find the following IBM.com entitled article useful (180 page guide). UniData Data Replication Operations Guide - v1.1 and v2.1 Also, the minimum UniData Windows release I would recommend for Replication is 7.1.9. The current 7.1.12 release is even better

RE: [U2] UD: Replication

PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Scholl Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 1:21 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] UD: Replication Thanks Wally, I am getting closer. After rebooting again, the RM service is running on both machines. Windows just wants a reboot every now

RE: [U2] UD: Replication

Phone: 301-924-5537 Cell: 301-613-9572 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wally Terhune Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 9:50 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] UD: Replication You may find the following

RE: [U2] [UD] Replication under Windows

I am glad to hear someone using replication and having a success story. Is anybody using it on UNIX? The only site I know of that tried it on UNIX did not have enough horsepower on subscribing side and had stop using it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [U2] [UD] Replication under Windows

David wrote: Why would I *want* the subscriber to re-evaluate a virtual field? Really the only case that Jonathan Smith or I have ever come up with is if you have a virtual field that uses data that is unique to a server (such as including the hostname or IP address). Or possibly path to an

RE: [U2] [UD] Replication under Windows

Sent by: Subject [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: [U2] [UD] Replication under stserver.u2ug.org Windows

RE: [U2] [UD] Replication under Windows - U2U sessions

David wrote: BTW -- are you doing either New York or California sessions?? Why read slides myself when I can have you read them to me?? ;-) I'm currently scheduled to present 4 sessions in both NY and SF (subject to change, of course!) DS2003, DS2010, DS2014, DS2015 I get to lull you to sleep

RE: [U2] [UD] Replication under Windows

This definitely makes sense -- but the default is that RW_REEVALUATE_VF=1 , and the documentation makes it sound like you may be getting into trouble by changing it -- But your logic is where I was -- why would you NOT want to send it over pre-chewed? I think the issue is the default needs to

RE: [U2] [UD] Replication

Hi We have been testing Unidata Replication for a number of months now and at the moment are unable to recommend it to our users. One of the main reasons, is that you can not be certain that the system is actually replicating. You should note that ud_repadmin -report only reports from local

RE: [U2] [UD] Replication

Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 5:24 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [UD] Replication Hi We have been testing Unidata Replication for a number of months now and at the moment are unable to recommend it to our users. One of the main reasons, is that you

RE: [U2] [UD] Replication

PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 5:24 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [UD] Replication Hi We have been testing Unidata Replication for a number of months now and at the moment are unable to recommend it to our users. One of the main reasons