RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-20 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
TED] Sent: Thursday, 17 June 2004 11:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe George Smith wrote: > As I have told you before I am not interested in Raining Data > and I for one wish you would stop your touting. My posting did have a little RD&

RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-19 Thread Jeff Ritchie
17 June 2004 11:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe George Smith wrote: > As I have told you before I am not interested in Raining Data > and I for one wish you would stop your touting. My posting did have a little RD&C and a smile

RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-18 Thread Ross Ferris
Not related Ross Ferris Stamina Software Visage  an Evolution in Software Development >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2- >[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Firl >Sent: Friday, 18 June 2004 1:25 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: [U2]

RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-18 Thread Dawn M. Wolthuis
Ferris > Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 10:55 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe > > Marketing costs $. Unless U2UG is going to start charging membership fees, > I don't see where this will be possible > > In terms of

RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-17 Thread David Jordan
] On Behalf Of Ross Ferris Sent: Friday, 18 June 2004 1:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe Marketing costs $. Unless U2UG is going to start charging membership fees, I don't see where this will be possible In terms of Cache size, IIRC they

RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-17 Thread Tony Gravagno
Dawn M. Wolthuis wrote: > Cache' blankets the Java market with ads as well... > I have no clue whether their marketing strategy is working to > grow them significantly beyond their initial MUMPs > base, but I'm definitely curious. Dawn, I've had loose discussions with MV VARs about Cache' for qu

RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-17 Thread Ross Ferris
tware Development >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2- >[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dawn M. Wolthuis >Sent: Friday, 18 June 2004 12:07 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe > >Cache' blanket

RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-17 Thread Tom Firl
> I've heard of MUMPS and interviewed at a hospital were that > was used. Was > that written in U2 ... Mumps was a DEC implementation? > My understanding is that MUMPS/Cache is somehow related to Revelation. I don't know if that's true or not, just one of those things a long-time MV programmer

RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-17 Thread David Jordan
] On Behalf Of Dawn M. Wolthuis Sent: Friday, 18 June 2004 12:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe Cache' blankets the Java market with ads as well. But I'd be very curious how their market compares to the U2 market. There are other MUMPs implem

RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-17 Thread GarryS
L PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 5:29 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe > > AND YET, I think one of the strengths of the Cache camp is that they > basically rolled a large number of Mumps implementations into a singl

RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-17 Thread Dawn M. Wolthuis
day. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ross Ferris > Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 7:29 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe > > AND YET, I think one of th

RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-17 Thread Ross Ferris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe >If there were a conference where all U2 customers, VARs, and third-parties >were present, there would be many competitors in the room (jBASE, onGroup, >and Raining Data, for example) and the more of that there is,

RE: Unclassified RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-17 Thread George Smith
. > -Original Message- > From: Leroy Dreyfuss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 7:02 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Unclassified RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe > > Folks, > > Hang in there.. UO.NET for U2

RE: Unclassified RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-17 Thread Marc Harbeson
Will one need to use UO.NET with 6.1 or will it also work with 5.x and 6.0? -Original Message- From: Leroy Dreyfuss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 8:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Unclassified RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe Folks

Re: Unclassified RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-16 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
be able to answer the > inevitable 'prove it!' > come-back with something a little more official than > 'Tony Gravagno said > so' > ;-) > > Thanks > > Mike > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-16 Thread Dawn M. Wolthuis
ED] On Behalf Of George Smith > Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 5:16 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe > > As I have told you before I am not interested in Raining Data and I for > one > wish you would stop your touting. >

Re: Unclassified RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-16 Thread Dave S
re > to do like you say and > "tell management that you're running > Microsoft-approved .NET > communications", I'd like to be able to answer the > inevitable 'prove it!' > come-back with something a little more official than > 'Tony Gravagno said > so

RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-16 Thread Tony Gravagno
George Smith wrote: > As I have told you before I am not interested in Raining Data > and I for one wish you would stop your touting. My posting did have a little RD&C and a smiley but since you'd like to approach this more seriously... I make my recommendations based on my sense of good busines

RE: Unclassified RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-16 Thread Tony Gravagno
from Tony Gravagno > [snip] > PDP now has the sanctions of Microsoft, and it can't hurt to > tell management that you're running Microsoft-approved .NET > communications with your IBM-approved database. > [snip] -- > Tony, > Please can you substantiate the statement "PDP now has the > sanctions o

Re: Unclassified RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-16 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
ficial than 'Tony Gravagno said so' ;-) Thanks Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno Sent: Thursday, 17 June 2004 09:34 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe [snip] PD

Unclassified RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-16 Thread HENDERSON MICHAEL MR
ble to answer the inevitable 'prove it!' come-back with something a little more official than 'Tony Gravagno said so' ;-) Thanks Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno Sent: Thursday, 17 June 2004 09:34 To

RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-16 Thread George Smith
thereafter, destroy the electronic message immediately. > -Original Message- > From: Tony Gravagno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 4:34 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe > > > -Original Mes

RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-16 Thread Tony Gravagno
> -Original Message- George Smith wrote > Two or three months ago I saw some post that said the .NET > provider for U2 > would be out in June. Anyone know if it has been released. Yeah, it's called the Pick Data Provider .NET from Raining Data. It's very popular with larger U2 sites. R