@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non
MV dbms
Sockets are just the pipe you push/pull things through. One of the
features they bring to the table is that you get to (yes, I actually
said that) design your own protocol for using them reliably or pick one
PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Baker Hughes
Sent: Thursday, 25 October 2007 12:20 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non-
MV dbms
Ross,
Yes, there is a real-world application to the question, at least one
That would be an [ad] ... but there are some people that may convince us
to port Visage.DRS to UV as well -- slight tweak would go a long way
to a proving parts of a solution for this scenario (but how did you
know we were looking at replication to foreign databases?)
Ross Ferris
Stamina Software
Better by Design!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Baker Hughes
Sent: Thursday, 25 October 2007 3:11 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non-
MV dbms
Glen,
snip
Well, I was actually only tasked with making the ATS more real time for
our Asia sales office. Since they're entering orders during our night,
they always get the short end of the stick, ATS may or may not be right;
the batch updates are all timed/tuned for US timezone (and work pretty
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ross Ferris
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 4:42 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and
non-MV dbms
That would be an [ad
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 1:35 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non
MV dbms [AD}
As promised here is Robert Houben's input to your question Baker!!! :)
For anyone who doesn't know me, I was the lead designer
@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non-MV dbms
Baker,
Given the scenario you have just outlined, and my imaginings of the way
that each of the 3 systems SHOULD work, you have no likelihood of
deadlock collisions (this could be guaranteed with possibly
@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and
non-MV dbms (AD)
Hello Baker,
We have a customer who is processing tens of thousands of transactions a
day. These transactions are centralized on SQL Server so that the Oracle
ESB, UniVerse and Web Systems can
Glen,
Good thoughts here as always, thanks. Right now, the UV db is not fully
replicated to the MSSQL tables, rather the other way around (for the
most part). The ISAM WCS tables also update UV. Therefore, at present,
the UV db comes closest to being the reference, and it still runs the
2007 2:36 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non
MV dbms
humorIs it just me or does it smell like troll in here all of a
sudden/humor
Since the question as defined in the sentence below is pretty generic
I'll respond in kind. Sockets
by Design!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Baker Hughes
Sent: Wednesday, 24 October 2007 5:05 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non
MV dbms
Thanks Jerry
-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non
MV dbms
humorIs it just me or does it smell like troll in here all of a
sudden/humor
Since the question as defined in the sentence below is pretty generic
I'll respond in kind. Sockets. Inter process communication across
disparate platforms
to this science.
-Baker
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ross Ferris
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 1:58 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non
MV dbms
Baker,
How live
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Baker Hughes
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 10:20 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non-MV
dbms
Ross,
Yes
Glen,
snip
You always get the good ones, doncha? What does the warehouse control
system use as a database? How many different O/S are we looking at here?
The first idea that comes to mind is transactional queuing and
inspection. A FIFO updating situation will not work, since you have
logic that
@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non MV dbms
Janet,
snip/
I can setup a conference call with one of Developers.
We have been in the transferring MultiValue data to other data sources
since the early 80's (PK Harmony to start with, anyone remember). We
@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non
MV dbms [AD}
As promised here is Robert Houben's input to your question Baker!!! :)
For anyone who doesn't know me, I was the lead designer and developer of
the PK Harmony product which we demoed at PC Labs
humorIs it just me or does it smell like troll in here all of a
sudden/humor
Since the question as defined in the sentence below is pretty generic
I'll respond in kind. Sockets. Inter process communication across
disparate platforms and applications is just what they were made for.
Low
Baker,
There is a happy medium between CPU overhead and bandwidth usage. If you
use compression of some kind, then CPU overhead is going to be higher than
an uncompressed stream. Cached disk writes are normally going to be faster
than network writes, unless you have a fiber backbone or
Sockets. If you have a consumer that can accept a socket connection, I
believe that'll provide the most efficient throughput.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Not likely, Baker Hughes has been in the PICK arena for many moons and
is one of the founders of the Texas users group.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Schasny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
humorIs it just me or does it smell like troll in here all of a
sudden/humor
---
u2-users mailing
Hello Baker,
Please email me.
I can setup a conference call with one of Developers.
We have been in the transferring MultiValue data to other data sources since
the early 80's (PK Harmony to start with, anyone remember). We may have some
good input for you.
Thanks,
Janet Bond
FusionWare
Janet,
When posting as a vendor or service provider, please use [AD]
brackets [/AD] in your response as a courtesy to others.
- Charles Barouch, Moderator
Janet Bond wrote:
I can setup a conference call with one of Developers.
We have been in the transferring MultiValue data to other
Subject: Re: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non MV dbms
[AD]
Janet,
When posting as a vendor or service provider, please use [AD]
brackets [/AD] in your response as a courtesy to others.
- Charles Barouch, Moderator
Janet Bond wrote:
I can setup a conference call
:10 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non
MV dbms
Not likely, Baker Hughes has been in the PICK arena for many moons and
is one of the founders of the Texas users group.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Schasny [mailto:[EMAIL
Janet,
snip/
I can setup a conference call with one of Developers.
We have been in the transferring MultiValue data to other data sources
since the early 80's (PK Harmony to start with, anyone remember). We may
have some good input for you.
/snip
I'm not in a position to buy anything, really
What is the fastest and lowest cpu overhead method of
transferring data between U2/MV databases, and other data sources?
Our esteemed colleague and moderator Chuck Barouch has/had a product called
Zeus which does/did transfers like this. If he can avoid self-censorship
for a moment I would
-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non MV
dbms [AD]
I added it in the Subject should it be somewhere else?
Please accept my apologies if I have offended anyone.
Janet
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George R Smith
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 3:13 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non MV dbms
[AD]
Gee Janet all you had to do was put This is not an ad, it's a fact of
business in your
30 matches
Mail list logo
