TED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 6:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [UD] OPENSEQ, WEOFSEQ, CLOSESEQ
Here is the basic structure I've been using in my export programs. It
does require that the directory you are working in is setup in the VOC
for the DELETE to work - I just wanted to be
I'm back. I lost my machine yesterday afternoon.
-Original Message-
From: Larry Hiscock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 2:21 PM
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: [UD] OPENSEQ, WEOFSEQ, CLOSESEQ
Comments inline:
>What version of
n doesn't mean that you can't fix it"
Stu Pickles
>-Original Message-
>From: Shawn Waldie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 2:02 PM
>To: U2 Users Discussion List
>Subject: RE: [UD] OPENSEQ, WEOFSEQ, CLOSESEQ
>
>
>My main probl
Goo'day,
Check the archives.
IIRC, somebody (Ray Wurlod??? ) published a *complete* set of code for
OPENSEQ/READSEQ/WEOFSEQ, etc, full of THEN ELSE's about 12 to 18 months ago
that goes a long way to getting the damn thing working correctly.
At 03:14 14/04/04, you wrote:
Except for one po
else branch, but
STATUS() will be zero, so it won't print the error message.
Larry Hiscock
Western Computer Services
http://www.wcs-corp.com
-Original Message-
From: Larry Hiscock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 12:50 PM
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
;U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: [UD] OPENSEQ, WEOFSEQ, CLOSESEQ
If you don't position the file with READSEQ, and you don't use the
APPEND clause on WRITESEQ, it should overwrite the file from the
beginning. The initial WEOFSEQ should be unnecessary, and in fact is
probably w
That WAS the reason.
Thank you very much.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 11:51 AM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: Re: [UD] OPENSEQ, WEOFSEQ, CLOSESEQ
I may be over simplifying this but there appears to be a
MAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Shawn Waldie
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 10:15 AM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: [UD] OPENSEQ, WEOFSEQ, CLOSESEQ
Except for one possible inconsistency with the instructions regarding
OPENSEQ, the documentation seems very straight-forwar
Of Shawn Waldie
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 10:15 AM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: [UD] OPENSEQ, WEOFSEQ, CLOSESEQ
Except for one possible inconsistency with the instructions regarding
OPENSEQ, the documentation seems very straight-forward. However, I'm
still missing something.
M
To: "U2 Users Discussion List" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
ege.edu> cc:
Sent by: Subje
Mel Maresh
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Waldie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 12:15 PM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: [UD] OPENSEQ, WEOFSEQ, CLOSESEQ
Except for one possible inconsistency with the instructions regarding
OPENSEQ, the documentation seems very st
Except for one possible inconsistency with the instructions regarding
OPENSEQ, the documentation seems very straight-forward. However, I'm
still missing something.
My intention is to:
1) create a record (if it doesn't already exist) in a DIR-type
file;
2) clear said record if data
12 matches
Mail list logo
