Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products

small to huge. Thank you, Robert -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Perry Taylor Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 8:35 PM To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products Hello

Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products

: Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:30 AM To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products Hi Perry, I'm a bit late to the party, but we (FusionWare) have a Managed Provider (ADO.NET) that works with U2 and is portable to other MultiValue platforms. If you're looking

Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products

com/in/roberthouben -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Perry Taylor Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 7:34 AM To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products Thanks to everyon

Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products

, May 29, 2013 10:12 AM To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products And from Bluefinity we certainly welcome Dan's endorsement to technology that enhances the use of U2 and makes for happy, long term users as this is great for everyone. There are certainly

Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products

inity -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Daniel McGrath Sent: 29 May 2013 15:27 To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products Thanks for the reply Tony, I can't speak

Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products

heers, Dan -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 1:52 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products > From: D

Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products

> From: Daniel McGrath > Tony, out of curiosity, have you looked at UO.NET's replacement: U2 > Toolkit for .NET? Not recently bud. Once I settle on a toolkit that works well, my research in that specific area slows down. How much research do we continue to do on cars after we've made a purchase?

Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products

From: Wjhonson > You stated below that its transportable. > Maybe you could give a few examples of what mv.NET can do for > those who don't need the transportable feature. Fair question. I'll provide some examples here but invite anyone with more detailed interest to contact me directly. - mv.N

Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products

users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products I'll preface by saying I catch some heat when I advocate some products, because I happen to sell them too. People confuse the cause and effect there. I sell products because I use them - I'm putting my money where

Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products

ct: Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products I'll preface by saying I catch some heat when I advocate some products, because I happen to sell them too. People confuse the cause and effect there. I sell products because I use them - I'm putting my money where my mouth is. I wa

Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products

I'll preface by saying I catch some heat when I advocate some products, because I happen to sell them too. People confuse the cause and effect there. I sell products because I use them - I'm putting my money where my mouth is. I was using them first as a choice, having considered other options jus

Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products

: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Perry Taylor Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 5:45 PM To: U2-Users List Subject: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products I'm investigating the pros and cons to using UniObjects.Net vs third-

Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products

I've used the UO.NET library with no issues with both ASP.NET web sites and Windows forms applications for years now... But the devil in the details and those may impact which tool is better Do the 3rd party tools offer some feature you foresee as a requirement that UO.NET does not provide?

Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products

other fancy stuff on top that MV.NET will give you ... -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Perry Taylor Sent: 28 May 2013 00:45 To: U2-Users List Subject: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products

Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products

... the best on each sides. My two pence. Manu > -Message d'origine- > De : u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users- > boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] De la part de Perry Taylor > Envoyé : mardi 28 mai 2013 01:45 > À : U2-Users List > Objet : [U2] [UV]

[U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products

I'm investigating the pros and cons to using UniObjects.Net vs third-party products such as MV.Net, etc. Anyone care to chime in with your experiences? Thanks. Perry Taylor Senior MV Architect ZirMed 888 West Market Street, Suite 400 Louisville, KY 40202 www.zirmed.com