This is indeed an end of an era for those of us who worked on the
development/sustaining and support of PI, PI Open/PI+
:-(
Clifton Oliver wrote:
As one of the engineers of the original Prime INFORMATION, I am
curious how many people on the list are still using PI Open. Anyone
care to sound o
Martin,
I did the same recently. Not only did i retire my PI/Open docs but all
of my old PI material dating back to my days prior to working at Prime
when I was at Standard Data Systems, one of the original PI dealers .
However the memories will always be with me...
-Lance
Martin Phill
Like when PI 5.4 was supposed to come out with Relational features and
then we backed them out of the release?
Results wrote:
PI/Open-ers,
I'd like to write a 'memorial' article for Database Trends
acknowledging the PI and Prime contributions to the community as a
whole. Would a few of yo
I think 3 lines of comments is generous ;-)
When I went through that lovely set of code to document the PI error
messages I was wishing i could find the design spec, but I believe the
spec matched the number of comments in the Kernel (i.e. it did not exist).
Clifton Oliver wrote:
That wou
And if it was not for Glen and Steve Buck who helped push for this
inclusion, PI might never have had this as part of the core product.
It did come to be a key piece of the product when PI+, PI/Open hit the
market as we encountered a lot of old MD, PICK shops that we targeted to
convert.
Wh
