RE: Linux kernel params

2004-03-15 Thread Don Kibbey
>> :-) >> >> Cheers, >> Wol >> >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> On Behalf Of Stu Glancy >> Sent: 11 March 2004 21:11 >> To: U2 Users Discussion List >> Subject: Re: Linux ker

RE: Linux kernel params

2004-03-15 Thread Stu Glancy
> >> Cheers, >> Wol >> >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> On Behalf Of Stu Glancy >> Sent: 11 March 2004 21:11 >> To: U2 Users Discussion List >> Subject: Re: Linux kernel params >> >>

RE: Linux kernel params

2004-03-12 Thread John Godzina
alled by, and "less" has the better set of options :-) > > Cheers, > Wol > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Stu Glancy > Sent: 11 March 2004 21:11 > To: U2 Users Discussion List > Subject: Re: Lin

RE: Linux kernel params

2004-03-12 Thread Anthony Youngman
age- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stu Glancy Sent: 11 March 2004 21:11 To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: Re: Linux kernel params We are doing similar from HP-UX to Linux 9 (kernel 2.4.20-28.9bigmem) and UV 10.0.O to UV 10.1 and found that APP.PROGS LIST.S

Re: Linux kernel params

2004-03-11 Thread Stu Glancy
We are doing similar from HP-UX to Linux 9 (kernel 2.4.20-28.9bigmem) and UV 10.0.O to UV 10.1 and found that APP.PROGS LIST.SP.CONF uses unix command "pg" which does not exist in linux Red Hat. We did a work around by creating a link from pg to more. This has been reported to IBM and is in engin